Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-wq2xx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-15T20:27:38.269Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Direct numerical simulation of turbulent channel flow with spanwise rotation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 December 2015

Zhenhua Xia*
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory for Turbulence and Complex Systems, College of Engineering, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics, College of Engineering, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
Yipeng Shi
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory for Turbulence and Complex Systems, College of Engineering, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics, College of Engineering, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
Shiyi Chen
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory for Turbulence and Complex Systems, College of Engineering, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics, College of Engineering, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China Collaborative Innovation Center of Advanced Aero-Engine, Beijing 100191, China Department of Mechanics and Aerospace Engineering, South University of Science and Technology of China, Shenzhen, Guangdong 518055, China
*
Email address for correspondence: xiazh1006@gmail.com

Abstract

A series of direct numerical simulations of turbulent channel flow with spanwise rotation at fixed global friction Reynolds number is performed to investigate the rotation effects on the mean velocity, streamwise velocity fluctuations, Reynolds shear stress and turbulent kinetic energy. The global friction Reynolds number is chosen to be $Re_{{\it\tau}}=u_{{\it\tau}}^{\ast }h^{\ast }/{\it\nu}^{\ast }=180$ ($u_{{\it\tau}}^{\ast }$ is the global friction velocity, $h^{\ast }$ is the channel half-width and ${\it\nu}^{\ast }$ is the kinematic viscosity), while the global-friction-velocity-based rotation number $Ro_{{\it\tau}}=2{\it\Omega}^{\ast }h^{\ast }/u_{{\it\tau}}^{\ast }$ (${\it\Omega}^{\ast }$ is the dimensional angular velocity) varies from 0 to 130. In the previously reported $2{\it\Omega}^{\ast }$-slope region for the mean velocity, a linear behaviour for the streamwise velocity fluctuations, a unit-slope linear profile for the Reynolds shear stress and a $-2Ro_{{\it\tau}}$-slope linear profile for the production term of $\langle u^{\prime }u^{\prime }\rangle$ have been identified for the first time. The critical rotation number, which corresponds to the laminar limit, is predicted to be equal to $Re_{{\it\tau}}$ according to the unit-slope linear profile of the Reynolds shear stress. Our results also show that a parabolic profile of the mean velocity can be identified around the ‘second plateau’ region of the Reynolds shear stress for $Ro_{{\it\tau}}\geqslant 22$. The parabolas at different rotation numbers have the same shape of $1/Re_{{\it\tau}}$, the radius of curvature at the vertex. Furthermore, the system rotation increases the volume-averaged turbulent kinetic energy at lower rotation rates, and then decreases it when $Ro_{{\it\tau}}\gtrsim 16$.

Type
Papers
Copyright
© 2016 Cambridge University Press 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alvelius, K.1999 Studies of turbulence and its modelling through large eddy- and direct numerical simulation. PhD thesis, Department of Mechanics, KTH Stockholm, Sweden.Google Scholar
Grundestam, O., Wallin, S. & Johansson, A. V. 2008a Direct numerical simulations of rotating turbulent channel flow. J. Fluid Mech. 598, 177199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grundestam, O., Wallin, S. & Johansson, A. V. 2008b A priori evaluations and least-squares optimizations of turbulence models for fully developed rotating turbulent channel flow. Eur. J. Mech. (B/Fluids) 27, 7595.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamba, F. 2006 The mechanism of zero mean absolute vorticity state in rotating channel flow. Phys. Fluids 18, 125104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huang, Y. N., Ma, H. Y. & Xu, J. L. 2008 On applying the extended intrinsic mean spin tensor to modelling the turbulence in non-inertial frames of reference. Sci. China G 51, 16911706.Google Scholar
Jakirlić, S., Hanjalić, K. & Tropea, C. 2000 Modeling rotating and swirling turbulent flows: a perpetual challenge. Phys. Fluids 12, 19791985.Google Scholar
Johnston, J. P. 1998 Effects of system rotation on turbulence structure: a review relevant to turbomachinery flows. Intl J. Rotating Mach. 4, 97112.Google Scholar
Johnston, J. P., Halleen, R. M. & Lezius, D. K. 1972 Effects of spanwise rotation on the structure of two-dimensional fully developed turbulent channel flow. J. Fluid Mech. 56, 533559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, J., Moin, P. & Moser, R. 1987 Turbulence statistics in fully developed channel flow at low Reynolds number. J. Fluid Mech. 177, 133166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kristoffersen, R. & Andersson, H. I. 1993 Direct simulations of low-Reynolds-number turbulent flow in a rotating channel. J. Fluid Mech. 256, 163197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lamballais, E., Lesieur, M. & Métais, O. 1996 Effects of spanwise rotation on the vorticity stretching in transitional and turbulent channel flow. Intl J. Heat Fluid Flow 17, 324332.Google Scholar
Lamballais, E., Métais, O. & Lesieur, M. 1998 Spectral-dynamic model for large-eddy simulations of turbulent rotating channel flow. Theor. Comput. Fluid Dyn. 12, 146177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Launder, B. E., Tselepidakis, D. P. & Younis, B. A. 1987 A second-moment closure study of rotating channel flow. J. Fluid Mech. 183, 6375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, N. S., Lu, X. Y. & Zhuang, L. X. 2004 An improved dynamic subgrid-scale model and its application to large eddy simulation of rotating channel flows. Sci. China G 47, 463476.Google Scholar
Maciel, Y., Picard, D., Yan, G. & Dumas, G.2003 Fully developed turbulent channel flow subject to system rotation. AIAA Paper, 2003–4153.Google Scholar
Marstorp, L., Brethouwer, G., Grundestam, O. & Johansson, A. 2009 Explicit algebraic subgrid stress models with application to rotating channel flow. J. Fluid Mech. 639, 403432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marusic, I., Monty, J. P., Hultmark, M. & Smits, A. J. 2013 On the logarithmic region in wall turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 716, R3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meneveau, C. & Marusic, I. 2013 Generalized logarithmic law for high-order moments in turbulent boundary layers. J. Fluid Mech. 719, R1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nakabayashi, K. & Kitoh, O. 1996 Low Reynolds number fully developed two-dimensional turbulent channel flow with system rotation. J. Fluid Mech. 315, 129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nakabayashi, K. & Kitoh, O. 2005 Turbulence characteristics of two-dimensional channel flow with system rotation. J. Fluid Mech. 528, 355377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perry, A. E., Henbest, S. M. & Chong, M. 1986 A theoretical and experimental study of wall turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 165, 163199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piomelli, U. & Liu, J.H. 1994 Large-eddy simulation of rotating channel flows using a localized dynamic model. Phys. Fluids 7, 839848.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spalart, R., Moser, R. D. & Rogers, M. 1991 Spectral methods for the Navier–Stokes equations with one infinte and two periodic directions. J. Comput. Phys. 96, 297324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stevens, R. J. A. M., Wilczek, M. & Meneveau, C. 2014 Large-eddy simulation study of the logarithmic law for second- and higher-order moments in turbulent wall-bounded flow. J. Fluid Mech. 757, 888907.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tafti, D. K. & Vanka, S. P. 1990 A numerical study of the effects of spanwise rotation on turbulent channel flow. Phys. Fluids A 3, 642656.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yang, Y. T. & Wu, J. Z. 2012 Channel turbulence with spanwise rotation studied using helical wave decomposition. J. Fluid Mech. 692, 137152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yang, Z. X., Cui, G. X., Zhang, Z. S. & Xu, C. X. 2012 A modified nonlinear sub-grid scale model for large eddy simulation with application to rotating turbulent channel flows. Phys. Fluids 24, 075113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar