Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-lvtdw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-01T11:01:27.775Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Azimuthal rotation in the axisymmetric meridional flow due to an electric-current source

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 April 2006

V. Bojarevičs
Affiliation:
Institute of Physics, Latvian S.S.R. Academy of Sciences, Salaspils, Riga 229021, U.S.S.R.
E. V. Shcherbinin
Affiliation:
Institute of Physics, Latvian S.S.R. Academy of Sciences, Salaspils, Riga 229021, U.S.S.R.

Abstract

The steady laminar flow driven by the meridional electromagnetic force due to an electric-current point source on a plane is considered. The previous studies of the problem (Shercliff 1970; Shilova & Shcherbinin 1971) lead to a self-similar solution of the full Navier–Stokes equations analogous to the classic Landau jet. The solution breaks down when a critical electric-current magnitude is exceeded (Sozou 1971). In the present paper the converging meridional flow is shown to be unstable to an axisymmetric azimuthal perturbation when the corresponding critical Reynolds number is exceeded. The flow solution breakdown is eliminated for the coupled converging and rotating flow. The physical process is suggested by the draining-vortex formation. The fluid-flow equations are solved by the Galerkin method, using expansions in Gegenbauer functions. The mechanism sustaining the rotation is examined; the increased angular momentum in the fluid region is maintained by the balance of viscous diffusion upstream and convection to the axis of symmetry. The experimental evidence for vortex formation is considered.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 1983 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Atthey, D. R. 1980 A mathematical model for fluid flow in a weld pool at high currents J. Fluid Mech. 98, 787801.Google Scholar
Batchelor, G. K. 1967 An Introduction to Fluid Dynamics. Cambridge University Press.
Bojareviĉs, V. 1981a MHD flows due to an electric current point source. Part 1. Magn. Gidrodin. No. 1, 2128.Google Scholar
Bojareviĉs, V. 1981b MHD flows due to an electric current point source. Part 2. Magn. Gidrodin. No. 2, 4144.Google Scholar
Bojareviĉs, V. & Millere, R. 1982 Amplification of azimuthal rotation in meridional electrically induced vortical flow in a hemisphere. Magn. Gidrodin. To appear in No. 4.Google Scholar
Bojareviĉs, V., Millere, R. & Chaikovsky, A. I. 1981 Investigation of the azimuthal perturbation growth in the flow due to an electric current point source. In Proc. 10th Riga Conf. on MHD, Salaspils, vol. 1, pp. 147148.
Craine, R. E. & Weatherill, N. P. 1980 Fluid flow in a hemispherical container induced by a distributed source of current and a superimposed uniform magnetic field J. Fluid Mech. 99, 112.Google Scholar
Dennis, S. C. R. & Singh, S. N. 1978 Calculation of the flow between two rotating spheres by the method of series truncation J. Comp. Phys. 28, 297314.Google Scholar
Goldshtik, M. A. 1960 A paradoxical solution of the Navier-Stokes equations Prikl. Mat. Mekh. 24, 610621.Google Scholar
Happel, J. & Brenner, H. 1965 Low Reynolds Number Hydrodynamics. Prentice-Hall.
Kawakubo, T., Tstutchiya, Y., Sugaya, M. & Matsumura, K. 1978 Formation of a vortex around a sink. Phys. Lett. 68 A, 6566.Google Scholar
Landau, L. D. 1944 On a new exact solution of the Navier-Stokes equations Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR 43, 299301.Google Scholar
Lundquist, S. 1969 On the hydromagnetic viscous flow generated by a diverging electric current Ark. Fys. 40, 8995.Google Scholar
Millere, R. P., Sharamkin, V. I. & Shcherbinin, E. V. 1980 On the effect of longitudinal magnetic field on the electrovorticity flow in a cylindrical container. Magn. Gidrodin. No. 1, 8185.Google Scholar
Moffatt, H. K. 1978 Some problems in the magnetohydrodynamics of liquid metals Z. angew. Math. Mech. 58, T65T71.Google Scholar
Narain, J. P. & Uberoi, M. S. 1971 Magnetohydrodynamics of conical flows Phys. Fluids 14, 26872692.Google Scholar
Orszag, S. 1971 Numerical simulations of incompressible flows within simple boundaries. 1. Galerkin (spectral) representation Stud. Appl. Math. 50, 293327.Google Scholar
Shcherbinin, E. V. 1969 On a class of exact solutions in the magnetohydrodynamics. Magn. Gidrodin. No. 4, 4658.Google Scholar
Shercliff, J. A. 1970 Fluid motion due to an electric current source J. Fluid Mech. 40, 241250.Google Scholar
Shilova, E. I. & Shcherbinin, E. V. 1971 MHD vortex flow in a cone. Magn. Gidrodin. No. 2, 3338.Google Scholar
Smislov, Y. N. & Shcherbinin, E. V. 1976 Nonlinear magnetohydrodynamic tornado model. In Problems of Mathematical Physics (ed. V. M. Tuchkevich), pp. 271282. Nauka.
Sozou, C. 1971 On the fluid motions induced by an electric current source J. Fluid Mech. 46, 2532.Google Scholar
Sozou, C. & English, H. 1972 Fluid motions induced by an electric current discharge. Proc. R. Soc. Lond A 329, 7181.Google Scholar
Sozou, C. & Pickering, W. H. 1976 Magnetohydrodynamic flow due to the discharge of an electric current in a hemispherical container J. Fluid Mech. 73, 641650.Google Scholar
Squire, H. B. 1951 The round laminar jet Q. J. Mech. Appl. Math. 4, 321329.Google Scholar
Torrance, K. E. 1979 Natural convection in the thermally stratified enclosures with localized heating from below J. Fluid Mech. 95, 477495.Google Scholar
Varshalovich, D. A., Moskalev, A. N. & Hersonsky, V. K. 1975 The Quantum Theory of Angular Momentum. Nauka.
Weir, A. D. 1976 Axisymmetric convection in a rotating sphere. Part 1 J. Fluid Mech. 75, 4979.Google Scholar
Wu, C.-S. 1961 A class of exact solutions of the magnetohydrodynamic Navier-Stokes equations Q. J. Mech. Appl. Math. 14, 119.Google Scholar
Yatseyev, V. I. 1950 On a class of exact solutions of the viscous fluid flow equations Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 20, 10311034.Google Scholar
Zhigulev, V. N. 1960 On ejection effect due to an electrical discharge Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR 130, 280283.Google Scholar