Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x24gv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-07T06:17:51.628Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Puzzle of Frequent and Large Issues of Debt and Equity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 September 2021

Rongbing Huang Open the ORCID record for Rongbing Huang [Opens in a new window]  and
Jay R. Ritter Open the ORCID record for Jay R. Ritter [Opens in a new window]
Rongbing Huang
Affiliation:
Kennesaw State University Coles College of Businessrhuang1@kennesaw.edu
Jay R. Ritter*
Affiliation:
University of Florida Warrington College of Business Administration
*
jay.ritter@warrington.ufl.edu (corresponding author)
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

More frequent, larger, and more recent debt and equity issues in the prior 3 fiscal years are followed by lower stock returns in the subsequent year. The intercept of a q-factor calendar-time regression for the value-weighted (VW) portfolio of firms with at least 3 large issues is −0.63% per month (t-stat. = −4.31). Purging the factor returns of recent issuers increases the magnitude of the estimated underperformance following frequent equity issues. A VW Fama–MacBeth regression shows that firms with 3 equity issues underperform nonissuers by 0.65% per month (t-stat. = −2.65). Earnings announcement returns are low following frequent issues, especially equity issues.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis , Volume 57 , Issue 1 , February 2022 , pp. 170 - 206
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Michael G. Foster School of Business, University of Washington

Footnotes

We thank an anonymous referee, Mark Flannery, Jon Garfinkel, Jason Karceski, Paul Malatesta (the editor), Feng Zhang, and Clara Qing Zhou, and the participants in seminars at Kennesaw State University, the University of Calgary, York University, and the 2016 FMA Annual Meeting and the 2017 FMA Asia/Pacific Conference for comments, Kenneth French for making the Fama–French factor returns available, and Lu Zhang for sharing the q-factor returns.

References

Baker, M., and Wurgler, J.. “The Equity Share in New Issues and Aggregate Stock Returns.” Journal of Finance, 55 (2000), 2219–2257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bessembinder, H.; Cooper, M. J.; and Zhang, F.. “Characteristics-Based Expected Returns and Corporate Events.” Review of Financial Studies, 32 (2019), 75–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bessembinder, H., and Zhang, F.. “Firm Characteristics and Long-Run Stock Returns After Corporate Events.” Journal of Financial Economics, 109 (2013), 83–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Billett, M. T.; Flannery, M. J.; and Garfinkel, J. A.. “Are Bank Loans Special? Evidence on the Post-Announcement Performance of Bank Borrowers.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 41 (2006), 733–751.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Billett, M. T.; Flannery, M. J.; and Garfinkel, J. A.. “Frequent Issuers’ Influence on Long-Run Post-Issuance Returns.” Journal of Financial Economics, 99 (2011), 349–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Billett, M. T.; Floros, I. V.; and Garfinkel, J. A.. “At-the-Market Offerings.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 54 (2019), 1263–1283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeAngelo, H.; DeAngelo, L.; and Stulz, R.. “Seasoned Equity Offerings, Market Timing, and the Corporate Life Cycle.” Journal of Financial Economics, 95 (2010), 275–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fama, E. F., and French, K. R.. “A Five-Factor Asset Pricing Model.” Journal of Financial Economics, 116 (2015), 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fama, E. F., and French, K. R.. “Dissecting Anomalies with a Five-Factor Model.” Review of Financial Studies, 29 (2016), 69–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fama, E. F., and MacBeth, J. D.. “Risk, Return, and Equilibrium: Empirical Tests.” Journal of Political Economy, 81 (1973), 607–636.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fu, F., and Huang, S.. “The Persistence of Long-Run Abnormal Returns Following Stock Repurchases and Offerings.” Management Science, 62 (2016), 964–984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenwood, R., and Hanson, S. G.. “Share Issuance and Factor Timing.” Journal of Finance, 67 (2012), 761–798.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hertzel, M.; Lemmon, M.; Linck, J. S.; and Rees, L.. “Long-Run Performance Following Private Placements of Equity.” Journal of Finance, 57 (2002), 2595–2617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hou, K.; Mo, H.; Xue, C.; and Zhang, L.. “Which Factors?” Review of Finance, 23 (2019), 1–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hou, K.; Mo, H.; Xue, C.; and Zhang, L.. “An Augmented q-Factor Model with Expected Growth.” Review of Finance, 25 (2021), 1–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hou, K.; Xue, C.; and Zhang, L.. “Digesting Anomalies: An Investment Approach.” Review of Financial Studies, 28 (2015), 650–705.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hou, K.; Xue, C.; and Zhang, L.. “Replicating Anomalies.” Review of Financial Studies, 33 (2020), 2019–2133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
La Porta, R.; Lakonishok, J.; Shleifer, A.; and Vishny, R.. “Good News for Value Stocks: Further Evidence on Market Efficiency.” Journal of Finance, 52 (1997), 859–874.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, I., and Loughran, T.. “Performance Following Convertible Bond Issuance.” Journal of Corporate Finance, 4 (1998), 185–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, C. M., and Tan, Y.. “Debt-Equity Choices, R&D Investment and Market Timing.” Journal of Financial Economics, 119 (2016), 599–610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, L. X., and Zhang, L.. “A Neoclassical Interpretation of Momentum.” Journal of Monetary Economics, 67 (2014), 109–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loughran, T., and Ritter, J. R.. “The New Issues Puzzle.” Journal of Finance, 50 (1995), 23–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loughran, T., and Ritter, J. R.. “Uniformly Least Powerful Test of Market Efficiency.” Journal of Financial Economics, 55 (2000), 361–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lyandres, E.; Sun, L.; and Zhang, L.. “The New Issues Puzzle: Testing the Investment-Based Explanation.” Review of Financial Studies, 21 (2008), 2825–2855.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLean, R. D., and Pontiff, J.. “Does Academic Research Destroy Return Predictability?” Journal of Finance, 71 (2016), 5–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ritter, J. R. “The Long-Run Performance of Initial Public Offerings.” Journal of Finance, 46 (1991), 3–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ritter, J. R. “IPO Data.” University of Florida (2021), available at https://site.warrington.ufl.edu/ritter/ipo-data/.Google Scholar
Spiess, D. K., and Affleck-Graves, J.. “Underperformance in Long-Run Stock Returns Following Seasoned Equity Offerings.” Journal of Financial Economics, 38 (1995), 243–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spiess, D. K., and Affleck-Graves, J.. “The Long-Run Performance of Stock Returns Following Debt Offerings.” Journal of Financial Economics, 54 (1999), 45–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wu, J.; Zhang, L.; and Zhang, X. F.. “The q-Theory Approach to Understanding the Accrual Anomaly.” Journal of Accounting Research, 48 (2010), 177–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, L. “The Investment CAPM.” European Financial Management, 23 (2017), 545–603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: PDF

Huang and Ritter supplementary material

Internet Appendix

Download Huang and Ritter supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 975.8 KB