No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Why Join? How Civil Society Organizations’ Attributes Signal Congruence and Impact Community Engagement
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 19 October 2021
Abstract
Civil society organizations (CSOs) can facilitate collective action. This makes understanding what shapes whether people are likely to engage with CSOs critically important. This paper argues that whether an organization is perceived as congruent – similar to an individual in values – is a key determinant of whether individuals will engage with it. I use a conjoint survey experiment to test how organizational attributes signaling congruence influence respondents’ willingness to attend a hypothetical organization’s meetings. I find that individuals are more likely to choose organizations that are more likely to be congruent with them, except when it comes to funding. These findings imply that an individual’s level of comfort with a CSO matters for engagement; thus, CSOs need to consider how they match to their publics when reaching out to potential joiners. Furthermore, donors seeking to support CSOs need to pay attention to their impact on perceptions of congruence.
Keywords
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Open Practices
Open data
Open materials
- Copyright
- © The Author(s) 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Experimental Research Section of the American Political Science Association
Footnotes
This article has earned badges for transparent research practices: Open Data and Open Materials. For details see the Data Availability Statement.
References
Alinsky, Saul D. 1989[1971]. Rules for Radicals: A Pragmatic Primer for Realistic Radicals. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
Arnesen, Sveinung and Peters, Yvette. 2018. “The Legitimacy of Representation: How Descriptive, Formal, and Responsiveness Representation Affect the Acceptability of Political Decisions.” Comparative Political Studies 51(7): 868–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baldwin, Kate and Winters, Matthew S.. 2020. “How Do Different Forms of Foreign Aid Affect Government Legitimacy? Evidence from an Informational Experiment in Uganda.” Studies in Comparative International Development 55: 160–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berman, Sheri. 2001. Civil Society and Political Institutionalization. In Beyond Tocqueville: Civil Society and the Social Capital Debate in Comparative Perspective, eds. Edwards, B., Foley, M. W., and Diani, M. Boston: Tufts University Press.Google Scholar
Bowen, Daniel C. and Clark, Christopher J.. 2014. “Revisting Descriptive Representation in Congress: Assessing the Effect of Race on the Constituent-Legislator Relationship.” Political Research Quarterly 67(3): 695–707.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brechenmacher, Saskia and Carothers, Thomas. 2018. “Examining Civil Society Legitimacy.” Carnegie Endowment for International Peace’s Civic Research Network. https://carnegieendowment.org/2018/05/02/examining-civil-society-legitimacy-pub-76211.Google Scholar
Calfano, Brian Robert and Djupe, Paul A.. 2009. “God Talk: Religious Cues and Electoral Support.” Political Research Quarterly 62(2): 329–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cammett, Melani and MacLean, Lauren M.. 2014. Introduction. In The Politics of Non-State Social Welfare, ed. Cammett, M and MacLean, L. M. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, pp. 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carlson, Elizabeth. 2015. “Ethnic Voting and Accountability in Africa: A Choice Experiment in Uganda.” World Politics 67(2): 353–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carnes, Nicholas and Sadin, Meredith L.. 2015. “The “Mill Worker’s Son” Heuristic: How Voters Perceive Politiicians from Working-Class Families — and How They Really Behave in Office.” The Journal of Politics 77(1): 285–298.Google Scholar
Chaplowe, Scott G. and Engo-Tjéga, Ruth Bamela. 2007. “Civil Society Organizations and Evaluation: Lessons from Africa.” Evaluation 13(2): 257–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dietrich, Simone. 2013. “Bypass or Engage? Explaining Donor Delivery Tactics in Foreign Aid Allocation.” International Studies Quarterly 57: 698–712.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, Michael and Hulme, David. 1996. “Too Close for Comfort? The Impact of Official Aid on Nongovernmental Organizations.” World Development 24(6): 961–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, Jocelyn, Arzheimer, Kai, Campbell, Rosie and Cowley, Philip. 2017. “Candidate localness and voter choice in the 2015 General Election.” Political Geography 59: 61–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferland, Benjamin. 2021. “Policy congruence and its impact on satisfaction with democracy.” Electoral Studies 69: 102204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foreman, Peter and Whetten, David A.. 2002. “Members’ Identification with Multiple-Identity Organizations.” Organization Science 13(6): 618–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grossman, Guy. 2014. “Do Selection Rules Affect Leader Responsiveness? Evidence from Rural Uganda.” Quarterly Journal of Political Science 9: 1–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guarrieri, Thomas R. 2018. “Guilty as perceived: How opinions about states influence opinions about NGOs.” Review of International Organizations 13: 573–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gugerty, Mary Kay and Kremer, Michael. 2008. “Outside Funding and the Dynamics of Participationin Community Assocations.” American Journal of Political Science 52(3): 585–602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hainmueller, Jens, Hopkins, Daniel J. and Yamamoto, Tepei. 2014. “Causal Inference in Conjoint Analysis: Understanding Multidimensional Choices via Stated Preference Experiments.” Political Analysis 22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoellerbauer, Simon. 2021. “Replication Data for: Why Join? How Civil Society Organizations’ Attributes Signal Congruence and Impact Community Engagement.” Harvard Dataverse, V1. doi: 10.7910/DVN/O6NMGE.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hrycak, Alexandra. 2006. “Foundation Feminism and the Articulation of Hybrid Feminisms in Post-Socialist Ukraine.” East European Politics and Societies 20(1): 69–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ishkanian, Armine. 2008. Democracy Building and Civil Society in Post-Soviet Armenia. New York, NY: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keele, Luke J., Shah, Paru R., White, Ismail and Kay, Krisinte. 2017. “Black Candidates and Black Turnout: A Study of Viability in Louisiana Mayoral Elections.” The Journal of Politics 79(3): 780–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klandermans, Bert and Oegema, Dirk. 1987. “Potentials, Networks, Motivations, and Barriers: Steps Toward Participation in Social Movements.” American Sociological Review 52(4): 519–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klandermans, Bert. 1984. “Mobilization and Participation: Social-Psychological Expansions of Resource Mobilization Theory.” American Sociological Review 49(5): 583–600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klandermans, Bert. 2007. The Demand and Supply of Participation: Social-Psychological Correlates of Participation in Social Movements. In The Blackwell Companion to Social Movements, ed. Snow, D. A., Soule, S. A. and Kriesi, H. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing, pp. 360–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lang, Sabine. 2013. NGOs, Civil Society, and the Public Sphere. New York, New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mati, Jacob M., Silva, Federico and Anderson, Tracy. 2010. “Assesing and Strengthening Civil Society Worldwide: An updated programme description of the CIVICUS Civil Society Index: Phase 2008 to 2010.” CIVICUS.Google Scholar
McDermott, Monika L. 2005. “Candidate Occupations and Voter Information Shortcuts.” The Journal of Politics 67(1): 201–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDermott, Monika L. 2009. “Religious Stereotyping and Voter Support for Evangelical Candidates.” Political Research Quarterly 62(2): 340–54.Google Scholar
Mendelson, Sarah E. and Glenn, John K., eds. 2002. The Power and Limits of NGOs: A Critical Look at Building Democracy in Eastern Europe and Eurasia. Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murdie, Amanda. 2014. Help or Harm: The Human Security Effects of International NGOs. Standford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Olson, Mancur. 1971. The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Porter, Gina. 2003. “NGOs and poverty reduction in a globalizing world: perspectives from Ghana.” Progress in Development Studies 3(2): 131–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shugart, Matthew Soberg, Valdini, Melody Ellis and Suominen, Kati. 2005. “Looking for Locals: Voter Information Demands and Personal Vote-Earning Attributes of Legislators under Proportional Representation.” American Journal of Political Science 49(2): 437–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simon, Bernd, Loewy, Michael, Stürmer, Stefan, Weber, Ulrike, Kampmeier, Claudia, Freytag, Peter, Habig, Corinna and Spahlinger, Peter. 1998. “Collective Identification and Social Movement Participation.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 74(3): 646–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Daniel Jordan. 2010. “Corruption, NGOs, and Development in Nigeria.” Third World Quarterly 31(2): 243–58.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sperling, Valerie. 1999. Organizing Women in Contemporary Russia: Engendering transition. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spires, Anthony J. 2012. “Lessons from Abroad: Foreign Influences on China’s Emerging Civil Society.” The China Journal 68: 125–46.Google Scholar
Tonda, Nanase and Kepe, Thembela. 2016. “Spaces of Contention: Tension Around Street Vendors’ Struggle for Livelihoods and Spatial Justice in Lilongwe, Malawi.” Urban Forum 27: 297–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
USAID. 2018. “2017 Civil Society Organization Sustainability Index.” USAID. https://www.usaid.gov/sites/default/files/documents/1866/2017-CSO-Sustainability-Index-for-Sub-Saharan-Africa.pdf.Google Scholar
VanDyck, Charles Kojo. 2017. “Concept and Definition of Civil Society Sustainability.” Center for Strategic and & International Studies.Google Scholar
World Bank. 2018. “World Development Indicators, Net ODA received (% of GNI).” [Data file]. Retrieved from https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/DT.ODA.ODAT.GN.ZS?locations=MW.Google Scholar
Hoellerbauer supplementary material
Appendix
PDF
489.8 KB