Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-jwnkl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-13T23:30:20.958Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Aftermath of Hamilton's “Report on Manufactures”

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 September 2004

DOUGLAS A. IRWIN
Affiliation:
Professor, Department of Economics, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH 03755. E-mail: douglas.irwin@dartmouth.edu

Abstract

Alexander Hamilton's “Report on Manufactures” (1791) is a classic document of U.S. economic policy, but its fate in Congress is not well known. It is commonly believed that the report was never implemented. Although Hamilton's proposals for bounties (subsidies) failed to receive support, virtually every tariff recommendation was adopted by Congress in early 1792. These tariffs were not highly protectionist because Hamilton feared discouraging imports, which were the critical tax base on which he planned to fund the public debt. As a consequence, protectionist interests shifted their political support from the Federalists to the Jeffersonian Republicans during the 1790s.

Type
ARTICLES
Copyright
© 2004 The Economic History Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1832 American State Papers. Various volumes. Washington: Gales and Seaton,
Ben-Atar Doron S. 1993 The Origins of Jeffersonian Commercial Policy and Diplomacy. New York: St. Martin's Press,
Ben-Atar Doron S. 1995Alexander Hamilton's Alternative: Technology Piracy and the Report on Manufactures.” William and Mary Quarterly 52 (July): 389414.Google Scholar
Cole Arthur H., Ed. 1928 Industrial and Commercial Correspondence of Alexander Hamilton, Anticipating his Report on Manufactures. Chicago: A.W. Shaw Co.,
Clarfield Gerard. 1975Protecting the Frontiers: Defense Policy and the Tariff Question in the First Washington Administration.” William and Mary Quarterly 32 (July): 44364.Google Scholar
Cooke Jacob E. 1975Tench Coxe, Alexander Hamilton, and the Encouragement of American Manufactures.” William and Mary Quarterly 32 (July): 36992.Google Scholar
Elkins Stanley, and Eric McKitrick. 1993 The Age of Federalism: The Early American Republic, 1788–1800. New York: Oxford University Press,
Ferling John. 2003 A Leap in the Dark: The Struggle to Create the American Republic. New York: Oxford University Press,
Freeman Joanne B. 2000‘The Art and Address of Ministerial Management’: Secretary of the Treasury Alexander Hamilton and Congress.” In Neither Separate Nor Equal: Congress in the 1790s, edited by Kenneth R. Bowling and Donald R. Kennon, 26993. Athens: Ohio University Press,
McCoy Drew R. 1980 The Elusive Republic: Political Economy in Jeffersonian America. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press,
Nelson John R.,Jr. 1979Alexander Hamilton and American Manufacturing: A Reexamination.” Journal of American History 65 (March): 97195.Google Scholar
Nelson John R.,Jr. 1987 Liberty and Property: Political Economy and Policymaking in the New Nation, 1789–1812. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press,
Peskin Lawrence A. 2002How the Republicans Learned to Love Manufacturing: The First Parties and the ‘New Economy.”’ Journal of the Early Republic 22 (September): 23562.Google Scholar
Peskin Lawrence A. 2003 Manufacturing Revolution: The Intellectual Origins of Early American Industry. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press,
Peterson Merrill D. 1965Thomas Jefferson and Commercial Policy, 1783–1793.” William and Mary Quarterly 22 (October): 584610.Google Scholar
Shankman Andrew. 2003 “‘A New Thing on Earth’: Alexander Hamilton, Pro-Manufacturing Republicans, and the Democratization of American Political Economy.” Journal of the Early Republic 23 (Fall): 32352.Google Scholar
Taussig Frank W. 1931 A Tariff History of the United States. 8th edition. New York: Putnam's,
Temin Peter. 1988Product Quality and Vertical Integration in the Early Cotton Textile Industry.” This JOURNAL 48, no. 4: 891907.Google Scholar
Young Edward. 1873 Special Report on the Customs Tariff Legislation of the United States. Washington, DC: GPO,