Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-01T21:25:59.991Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Interpretations of Catholic History

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 March 2011

Dermot Fenlon
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review Articles
Information
The Journal of Ecclesiastical History , Volume 33 , Issue 2 , April 1982 , pp. 256 - 265
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 He considers the Council of Trent ‘should' have been a council of reunion. Why it could not have been so became abundantly clear when the Lutheran delegates invited to attend its sessions refused to recognise a council summoned under papal auspices. Delumeau's observation takes no account of Jedin's discussion of the subject.

2 The original French edition of Catholicism between Luther and Voltaire was reviewed by Judge, H. G. in this Journal, xxiv (1973), 93Google Scholar.