Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-6f6fcd54b-sdp72 Total loading time: 0.297 Render date: 2021-05-12T03:19:13.778Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: {}

Anti-trinitarianism and Toleration in Late Eighteenth Century British Politics: the Unitarian Petition of 1792

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 February 2009

G. M. Ditchfield
Affiliation:
Faculty of the Humanities, Darwin College, The University, Canterbury, Kent CT2 7NY

Extract

The prominence of religious issues in eighteenth-century British politics has received growing, and gratifying, recognition in recent years. In particular, attacks upon, and defences of, the doctrine of the Trinity have been seen as central to theological, and hence to political, debate. For many, the term ‘orthodoxy’ without qualification referred to one's position on this question. Although there is perhaps still insufficient emphasis upon trinitarian orthodoxy as a central feature of what is fashionably termed the state's self-image, Unitarianism is rightly perceived as important to critiques of the existing regime, especially after 1750. Historians of the Wilkites, of later eighteenth-century radicalism and of peace campaigns in the Napoleonic period, have cast Unitarians in at least a supporting, and sometimes a leading, role. Yet too often Unitarianism has appeared elusive and difficult to pin down, manyheaded and half-concealed under the vague label of ‘heterodoxy’.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below.

References

1 Apart from Clark, J. C. D., English Society 1688–1832. Ideology, social structure and political practice during the ancien regime, Cambridge 1985, ch. iv.Google Scholar

2 Christie, Ian R., Wilkes, Wyvill and Reform. The parliamentary reform movement in British politics, 17601785, London 1962, 53–5, 77 ff;Google ScholarClark, op. cit. ch. v; Cookson, J. E., The Friends of Peace. Anti-war liberalism in England, 17931815, Cambridge 1982, especially ch. i.Google Scholar

3 Clark, op. cit. 344.Google Scholar

4 The Acts of the Parliaments of Scotland, 12 vols, ed. Thomson, T. and Innes, C., Edinburgh 18141875, vii. 202–3; ix. 386–7Google Scholar ;Howell, T. B., A Complete Collection of State Trials, 33 vols, London 18091826, xiii. 918–40Google Scholar; Short, L. Baker, Pioneers of Scottish Unitarianism,, 1963, 915.Google Scholar

5 Norman, Sykes, William Wake, Archbishop of Canterbury, 2 vols, Cambridge 1957, ii. 168Google Scholar; Townend, G. M., ‘Religious radicalism and conservatism in the Whig Party under George 1: the repeal of the Occasional Conformity and Schism Acts’, Parliamentary History vii (1988), 3740; Clark, op. cit. 286–7.Google Scholar

6 London Evening Post, 17–19 July 1753.

7 An Abridgment of the Acts of the General Assemblies of the Church of Scotland, from the year 1638 to 1802 inclusive, ed. Gillan, R., Hawick, 1803, 120Google Scholar; Short, Pioneers, 16–21.

8 For some examples see John, Seed, The Role of Unitarianism in the Formation of Liberal Culture, 1775–1851: A social history, unpubl. PhD diss., Hull University 1981. 54–5.Google Scholar

9 Letter of ‘Julian’ in Gentleman's Magazine lxi (1791), 306.Google Scholar

10 Hobhouse, B., A Treatise on Heresy, as cognizable by the Spiritual Courts. And an Examination of the Statute gth and 10th of William III c. 32, London 1792.Google Scholar

11 Priestley, Joseph, An Appeal to the public, on the Subject of the Riots in Birmingham, Birmingham 1792, 1516Google Scholar . He exaggerated the term of imprisonment from three years to life.

12 McLachlan, H., Letters of Theophilus Lindsey, Manchester 1920, 33–4.Google Scholar

13 Monthly Repository xx (1825), 338–9.

14 Havard, N., A Narrative of the Origin and Progress of the Prosecution against the Rev. Edward Evanson, late Vicar of Tewkesbury, London 1778.Google Scholar

15 Ditchfield, G.M., ‘The Revd. William Chambers, D.D’, Enlightenment and Dissent iv (1985), 312.Google Scholar

16 Hobhouse, Treatise, 104.

17 The Works of Samuel Parr, LL.D, 8 vols, London 1828, viii. 154–5.

18 H.John, McLachlan, Socinianism in Seventeenth-century England, Oxford 1951, 333–4.Google Scholar

19 Prochaska, F. K., ‘English state trials in the 1790s: a case study’, JBS xiii (1973), 6382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

20 Ian, R.Christie, Stress and Stability in late Eighteenth-century Britain: Reflections on the British avoidance of revolution, Oxford 1984, 143.Google Scholar

21 Cobbett, W., Parliamentary History of England, 1066–1803, 36 vols, London 18061820, xvii. 273.Google Scholar

22 Madan, Spencer, The Principal Claims of the Dissenters Considered, Birmingham 1790, 1920.Google Scholar

23 Priestley, Appeal, 16.Google Scholar

24 Samuel, Horsley, Tracts in Controversy with Dr Priestley, Dundee 1815, 455.Google Scholar

25 Parl. Hist. xxix. 1397.Google Scholar

26 Thomas, Belsham, Memoirs of the late Reverend Theophilus Lindsey, centenary ed, London 1873, 202.Google Scholar

27 See Michael, Watts, The Dissenters. From the Reformation to the French Revolution, Oxford 1978, 371–5.Google Scholar

28 Belsham, op. cit. 199.

29 John, Disney, Letters to the Rev. Vicesimus Knox, London 1792, 25.Google Scholar

30 Lindsey to William Frend, 12 Mar. 1791, CUL, Frend Papers.

31 Belsham, op. cit. 196–7.

32 Disney, op. cit. 27.

33 William, Frend, Thoughts on Subscription to Religious Tests, St Ives 1788, 26n.Google Scholar

34 Monthly Review, NS ix (1792), 175.

35 James Wodrow to Samuel Kenrick, 16 June 1791, DWL, Kenrick Papers; Monthly Review, NS viii (1792), 580–1;Christopher, Wyvill, Political Papers, 6 vols, York 17941806, v. 16-17.Google Scholar

36 Lindsey to Frend, 12 Mar. 1791, Frend Papers; Lindsey to John Rowe, 6 Mar. 1792, JRL, Lindsey Correspondence.

37 Estlin to Belsham, 27 Feb. 1791, DWL, MSS 12. 48 (12). There is a list of the founding members of the Unitarian Society in Unitarian Society for Promoting Christian Knowledge, London 1791, 9–14, and in Seed, Unitarianism, 368–71.Google Scholar

38 Lindsey to William Turner of Wakefield, 28 Oct. 1786, DWL, Lindsey Correspondence. Price joined the Unitarian Society in 1791 but died in the same year.Google Scholar

39 Boswell: Laird of Auchinleck 1778–1782, ed. Reed, Joseph W. and Pottle, Frederick A., London 1977, 295.Google Scholar

40 David L. Wykes, ‘Dissenting academy or Unitarian seminary? Manchester College at York, 1803–40’, TUHS xi 2 (1988), 102–12.Google Scholar

41 The Case of Charles Le Grice, Norwich 1788;Knight, F., University Rebel. The life of William Frend, 1757–1841, London 1971, 61–2; article on George Dyer in DNB.Google Scholar

42 Kenrick to Wodrow, 2 July 1792, Kenrick Papers.Google Scholar

43 S. Heywood, High Church Politics, London 1792, 54–6, 69–71.Google Scholar

44 J. C. D. Clark writes, ‘Dissenters’ early satisfaction with “toleration” can be read in two ways: as proof of society‘s objective attainment of that state or as evidence for orthodox Dissenters’ affinities with orthodox Anglicans, until the recrudescence of Dissenting heterodoxy transformed Dissenters‘ perceptions of their status’: ‘On hitting the buffers: the historiography of England’s ancien regime: a response‘, Past and Present cxvii (1987), 204 n. 28. Clark rightly prefers the second alternative, although one should add the crucial proviso that in the later eighteenth century many orthodox dissenters regarded the existing toleration laws as welcome protection against Socinianism and wanted them preserved. Their view of’ toleration' became more, not less, favourable.

45 See F. C. Mather, ‘ Georgian churchmanship reconsidered: some variations in Anglican public worship, 1714–1830’, this JOURNAL xxxvi (1985), 255–83.Google Scholar

46 Lindsey to Frend, 14 Feb. 1791, Frend Papers; Kenrick to Wodrow, 10 June 1791, Kenrick Papers; Belsham, Memoirs of Lindsey, 200.Google Scholar

47 Belsham, op. cit. 199.

48 Disney, J., A Dialogue between a Clergyman of the Church of England and a Lay-Gentleman, London 1792, 19.Google Scholar

49 Lindsey to Frend, 10 Aug., 14 Nov. 1789, 2 Jan., 31 May 1790, Frend Papers.Google Scholar

50 Felix Farley's Bristol Journal, 5 May 1791, Timothy Kenrick to Samuel Kenrick, 15 Mar. 1791, JRL, Kenrick MSS.Google Scholar

51 Lindsey to William Tayleur, 9 Feb. 1791; JRL, Lindsey Correspondence; Parl. Hist. xxix 1,393.Google Scholar

52 Lindsey to Frend, 14 Feb. 1791, Frend Papers.Google Scholar

53 Alexander, McNair, Scots Theology in the Eighteenth Century, London 1928, ch. vii.Google Scholar

54 Wodrow to Kenrick, 10 Jan. 1791, Kenrick Papers.

55 Lindsey to Tayleur, 9 Apr. 1791, JRL, Lindsey Correspondence.

56 Kenrick to Wodrow, 1–2 Mar. 1791, Kenrick Papers.

57 Wodrow to Kenrick, 28 Mar. 1791, Kenrick Papers.

58 Address from the General Assembly of the Church of Scotland to George m, 19 May 1792, PRO, Home Office Papers 102 (Scotland) 5, fo. 52.Google Scholar

59 See, for example, Wodrow to Kenrick, 16 June 1791, Kenrick Papers.Google Scholar

60 Wodrow to Kenrick, 30 May 1792, Kenrick Papers;Google ScholarMacWhirter, A., ‘Unitarianism in Scotland’, Records of the Scottish Church History Society xiii (1959) 101–43.Google Scholar

61 Historical Manuscripts Commission, Laing MSS, ii. 548; Hill, Andrew M., ‘The successors of the Remnant: a bicentenary account of St Mark’s Unitarian Church, Edinburgh. Part I: before 1776 until 1822', TUHS xvi/3, (1977), 121 n. 47.Google Scholar

62 Pad. Hist. xxix. 1,431–64.Google Scholar

63 Memoirs of the Life of Sir Samuel Romilly, written by himself, 3 vols, London 1840, i. 444.Google Scholar

64 JHC, xcvii. 823–4, 1,089;Hutton, W., The History of Birmingham, Birmingham 1835, 206.Google Scholar

65 The Correspondence of Edmund Burke vii, ed. Marshall, P.J. and Woods, John A., Cambridge 1967, 119.Google Scholar

66 Deny, Warren, Parr, Dr: A Portrait of the Whig Dr Johnson, Oxford 1966, 137Google Scholar ;Ditchfield, G.M., ‘Three unpublished letters of Joseph Priestley’, Enlightenment and Dissent, ii (1983), 105.Google Scholar

67 Gentleman's Magazine lxi (1791), 924–7; Lindsey to Tayleur, 19 Sept. 1791, JRL, Lindsey Correspondence.Google Scholar

68 Parl. Hist. xxvi. 818; Lindsey to Russell Scott, 21 Feb. 1792, Scott Collection kindly communicated by the Revd Dr H. John McLachlan.Google Scholar

69 A similar act for Scotland was passed in 1793.Google Scholar

70 Martin, Fitzpatrick, ‘Joseph Priestley and the cause of universal toleration’, Price-Priestley Newsletter i (1977) 3–30, and idem, ‘Toleration and truth’, Enlightenment and Dissent i (1982), 331.Google Scholar

71 Lindsey to Tayleur, 1 Mar. 1791, JRL Lindsey Correspondence; DWL, Odgers MSS, 93 H7.Google Scholar

72 Lindsey to Frend, 12 Mar. 1791, Frend Papers;The Works, Literary, Moral and Medical of Thomas Percival, 4 vols, London 1807, i. p. clxviii.Google Scholar

73 The Senator, 1st ser. ii (1791), 339;Google ScholarHouse of Commons Sessional Papers of the Eighteenth Century, 145 vols, ed. Sheila, Lambert, Wilmingham 1975, lxxix. 155, 179Google Scholar ;Lindsey to Tayleur, 9 Apr. 1791, JRL, Lindsey Correspondence.Google Scholar

74 F. C. Mather, ‘Church, parliament and penal laws: some Anglo-Scottish interactions in the eighteenth century’, EHR xcii (1977), 540–72.Google Scholar

75 John, Skinner, Annals of Scottish Episcopacy, Edinburgh 1818, 219–20.Google Scholar

76 JHL xxxix. 220;Google ScholarLambeth Palace Library, Moore Papers, vol. viii fos 212–14; Morning Chronicle, 31 Dec. 1791, 9 Jan. 1792;Google ScholarLineham, P., ‘The origins of the New Jerusalem Church in the 1780s’, Bulletin of the JRL lxx (1988), 109–22.Google Scholar

77 Joseph, Priestley, Letters to the Members of the New Jerusalem Church, Birmingham, 1791Google Scholar ;Gentleman's Magazine lxi (1791), 621, 1,006, 1,216–9.Google Scholar

78 General Evening Post, 15–17 June 1790Google Scholar ;Goodwin, A., The Friends of Liberty: The English democratic movement in the age of the French Revolution, London 1979, 1976.Google Scholar

79 Parry, Notably W., Thoughts on such Penal Statutes as affect the Protestant Dissenters, London 1791, and C. Wyvill, A Defence of Dr Price and the Reformers of England, London 1792.Google Scholar

80 The Works, Theological, Medical, Political and Miscellaneous of John Jebb… with Memoirs of the Life of the Author by John, Disney, 3 vols, London 1787, 1. ix-xxiiGoogle Scholar ;The Works of Nathaniel Lardner… with Life of the Author by Andrew, Kippis, 11 vols, London 1788, list of subscribers (pages not numbered) in vol. i.Google Scholar

81 Clark, , English Society, 311–13.Google Scholar

82 Boswell: The English Experiment, 1785–1789, ed. Lustig, Irma S. and Pottle, Frederick A., London 1986, 124–5Google Scholar ;Francis, Kilvert, Memoirs of the Life and Writings of the Right Reverend Richard Hurd… Lord Bishop of Worcester, London 1860, 114.Google Scholar

83 Seed, John, ‘Gentlemen dissenters: the social and political meanings of rational dissent in the 1770s and 1780s’, Historical Journal xxviii (1985), 308–9, 319–20.Google Scholar

84 Lindsey to Tayleur, 9 Apr. 1791, JRL, Lindsey Correspondence; Morning Chronicle, 5 Nov. 1791; Kentish Gazette, 10 Feb. 1792.Google Scholar

85 Fox to Fitzwilliam, 16 Mar. 1792, Northants. Record Office, Fitzwilliam Correspondence, drawer 44. The ‘other wing of the Coalition’ is a reference to the followers of the North.Google Scholar

86 Lindsey to Tayleur, 26 Mar. 1792, JRL, Lindsey Correspondence.Google Scholar

87 Lindsey to Frend, 13 Apr. 1792, Frend Papers.Google Scholar

88 John, Ehrman, The Younger Pitt: the reluctant transition, London 1983, 174–5.Google Scholar

89 Rutt, J. T., The Life and Correspondence of Joseph Priestley, 2 vols, London 1831-1832, ii. 181–2.Google Scholar

90 Hobhouse, , Treatise, 130, 134, 144.Google Scholar

81 Lindsey to Tayleur, 26 Mar. 1792, JRL, Lindsey Correspondence; Morning Chronicle, 9 Mar. 1792.Google Scholar

92 JHC, xlvii. 787–9;Google ScholarPart. Hist. xxix. 1,372–81.Google Scholar

93 I hope to examine the petitioning campaign, and the support which it generated, in a separate article.Google Scholar

94 Goodwin, , Friends of Liberty, 207; Public Advertiser, 23 May 1792.Google Scholar

95 Part. Hist. xxix. 1388.Google Scholar

96 Selections from the Papers of the London Corresponding Society, ed. Mary, Thale, Cambridge 1985, 19, xxiv.Google Scholar

97 BL, Add. MS 27811, fo. 8; Letter Books of the London Corresponding SocietyGoogle Scholar ;Add. MS 27812, fo. 38.Google Scholar

98 Selections from the Papers of the LCS, 306, 312.Google Scholar

99 Manchester Mercury, 22 May, 5 June 1792Google Scholar ;Manchester Herald, 9 June 1792Google Scholar ;Gordon, A., Historical Account of Dob Lane Chapel, Failsworth, Manchester 1904, 41–2Google Scholar ;McLachlan, H., Essays and Addresses, Manchester 1950, 112–29Google Scholar ;Booth, A., ‘Popular loyalism and public violence in the north-west of England, 1790-1800’, Social History viii (1983), 295313.Google Scholar

100 Scottish Record Office, Melville Castle Muniments, GD51/1/224;Google ScholarSamuel Parr to Dartmouth, 5 June 1792, Staffs. Record Office, Dartmouth MSS, D. 1778 v 957.Google Scholar

101 Knight, F., The Strange Case of Thomas Walker, London 1957Google Scholar ;BL, Add. MS 16920, fo. 14, Papers of the Association for the Preservation of Liberty and Property against Republicans and Levellers.Google Scholar

102 Timothy Kenrick to Samuel Kenrick, 26 Feb. 1793Google Scholar ;Kenrick MSSGoogle Scholar ;see also Alan, Brockett, Nonconformity in Exeter, 1650–1875, Manchester 1962, 137–45.Google Scholar

103 Thomas, Somerville, My Own Life and Times, 1741-1814, Edinburgh 1861, 278.Google Scholar

104 Manchester Herald, 7 Apr. 1792.Google Scholar

105 Belsham, , Memoirs of Lindsey, 204.Google Scholar

106 See, for instance, St James's Chronicle, 31 Mar. to 3 Apr. 1792Google Scholar ;Kentish Gazette, 17 Apr. 1792.Google Scholar

107 Gentleman's Magazine lxi (1791), 925.Google Scholar

108 The Correspondence of King George the Third, 6 vols, ed. SirFortescue, John, London 19271928, iii. 70Google Scholar ;William, Jones, A Preservative against the Publications dispersed by Modern Socinians, London 1786, 17.Google Scholar

109 William, Wilberforce, A Practical View of the prevailing Religious System of professed Christians, in the higher and middle classes in this Country; contrasted with real Christianity, London 1797. 475.Google Scholar

110 For some examples, see Watts, , The Dissenters, 468–9, and Seed, Unitarianism, 53–4.Google Scholar

111 Ditchfield, G. M., ‘The subscription issue in British parliamentary politics, 1772-1779’, Parliamentary History vii (1988), 58–9, 78.Google Scholar

112 Rack, Henry D., ‘Early Methodist visions of the Trinity’, Proceedings of the Wesley Historical Society xlvi/3 (1987), 65–9.Google Scholar

113 John, Whitaker, The Origin of Arianism disclosed, London 1791, 398.Google Scholar

114 Norfolk Chronicle, or Norwich Gazette, 2 June 1792.Google Scholar

115 Reid, W. H., The Rise and Dissolution of the Infidel Societies in this Metropolis, 2nd edn, London 1800, 89, 19.Google Scholar

116 Debrett, J., Parliamentary Register xxxiii. 387.Google Scholar

117 See especially Joshua, Toulmin, The Injustice of classing Unitarians with Deists and Infidels, London 1797.Google Scholar

118 Wyvill, , Political Papers v. 15.Google Scholar

119 Jeremy, Bentham to William, Smith, Feb. 1818, printed in the introduction to his Church of Englandism and its Catechism examined, London 1818.Google Scholar

120 Davis, R. W., Dissent in Politics 1780-1830:Google ScholarThe political life of William Smith, M.P., London 1971, 200–1;Google ScholarClark, English Society, 379–80.Google Scholar

121 Henriques, U., Religious Toleration in England, 1787-1833, London 1961, 210–14Google Scholar ;I. McCalman, ‘Ultra-radicalism and convivial debating clubs in London, 1795–1838’, EHR cii (1987), 315.Google Scholar

122 J.Ann, Hone, For the Cause of Truth. Radicalism in London, 17961821, Oxford 1982, 223–4Google Scholar ;Clark, op. cit. ch. v; M. Philp, ‘Rational religion and political radicalism in the 1790s’, Enlightenment and Dissent iv (1985), 39.Google Scholar

123 Wyvill, Political Papers v. 17.Google Scholar

124 Lindsey to Timothy Kenrick, 29 May 1792, JRL, Lindsey Correspondence.Google Scholar

125 Pad. Hist. xxix. 1,398.Google Scholar

126 D. Bellenger, ‘The emigre clergy and the English Church, 1789–1815’, this JOURNAL xxxiv (1983), 392–410.Google Scholar

127 Horsley‘s letter to the clergy of St David’s, May 1793, quoted in David, Jones, The Welsh Freeholder‘s Farewell Epistles to the Right Rev. Samuel Lord Bishop (lately ofSt David’s) now of Rochester, London 1794, pp. viii-ix.Google Scholar

128 Jones, op. cit. 8–11.Google Scholar

129 Bellenger, art. cit. 410;Google ScholarRobert, Hall, Works, 6 vols, London 1832, iv. 188225.Google Scholar

130 Ditchfield, G. M., ‘A Unitarian view ofEnglish dissent in 1807’, TUHS xviii (1984), 80;Google Scholar Dean Rapp,‘ The left-wing Whigs: Whitbread, the mountain and reform, 1809–1815’, JBSxxi (1982), 38–40. Richard, Brent, Liberal Anglican Politics: Whiggery, religion and reform 18301841, Oxford 1987, was writing of a significantly later period in his exposition of an affinity between certain varieties of Whiggery and a broad church, liberal Anglicanism.Google Scholar

131 J. A. Phillips, Electoral Behaviour in Unreformed England: Plumpers, Splitters and Straights, Princeton 1982, 292 ff.Google Scholar

132 Davis, Dissent in Politics, ch. x;Google ScholarCookson, Friends of Peace, 191.Google Scholar

133 Wyvill to Samuel Whitbread MP, 22 Nov. 1809, 5 May 1811, 10 Feb. 1812, Beds. County Record Office, Whitbread Papers, W1/4290, W1/4309, W1/4335,Google Scholar

134 Most recently Donnelly, F. K., ‘Joseph Towers and the collapse of rational dissent’, Enlightenment and Dissent vi (1987), 31–9Google Scholar .The word ‘collapse’ seems something of an overstatement.Google Scholar

135 SeeWebb, R.K., ‘The Unitarian background’, in Smith, Barbara (ed.), Truth, Liberty, Religion: Essays celebrating two hundred years of Manchester College, Oxford 1986, 20 ff.Google Scholar

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Anti-trinitarianism and Toleration in Late Eighteenth Century British Politics: the Unitarian Petition of 1792
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Anti-trinitarianism and Toleration in Late Eighteenth Century British Politics: the Unitarian Petition of 1792
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Anti-trinitarianism and Toleration in Late Eighteenth Century British Politics: the Unitarian Petition of 1792
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response


Your details


Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *