Published online by Cambridge University Press: 06 February 2009
The prominence of religious issues in eighteenth-century British politics has received growing, and gratifying, recognition in recent years. In particular, attacks upon, and defences of, the doctrine of the Trinity have been seen as central to theological, and hence to political, debate. For many, the term ‘orthodoxy’ without qualification referred to one's position on this question. Although there is perhaps still insufficient emphasis upon trinitarian orthodoxy as a central feature of what is fashionably termed the state's self-image, Unitarianism is rightly perceived as important to critiques of the existing regime, especially after 1750. Historians of the Wilkites, of later eighteenth-century radicalism and of peace campaigns in the Napoleonic period, have cast Unitarians in at least a supporting, and sometimes a leading, role. Yet too often Unitarianism has appeared elusive and difficult to pin down, manyheaded and half-concealed under the vague label of ‘heterodoxy’.
1 Apart from Clark, J. C. D., English Society 1688–1832. Ideology, social structure and political practice during the ancien regime, Cambridge 1985, ch. iv.Google Scholar
2 Christie, Ian R., Wilkes, Wyvill and Reform. The parliamentary reform movement in British politics, 1760–1785, London 1962, 53–5, 77 ff;Google ScholarClark, op. cit. ch. v; Cookson, J. E., The Friends of Peace. Anti-war liberalism in England, 1793–1815, Cambridge 1982, especially ch. i.Google Scholar
4 The Acts of the Parliaments of Scotland, 12 vols, ed. Thomson, T. and Innes, C., Edinburgh 1814–1875, vii. 202–3; ix. 386–7Google Scholar ;Howell, T. B., A Complete Collection of State Trials, 33 vols, London 1809–1826, xiii. 918–40Google Scholar; Short, L. Baker, Pioneers of Scottish Unitarianism,, 1963, 9–15.Google Scholar
5 Norman, Sykes, William Wake, Archbishop of Canterbury, 2 vols, Cambridge 1957, ii. 168Google Scholar; Townend, G. M., ‘Religious radicalism and conservatism in the Whig Party under George 1: the repeal of the Occasional Conformity and Schism Acts’, Parliamentary History vii (1988), 37–40; Clark, op. cit. 286–7.Google Scholar
6 London Evening Post, 17–19 July 1753.
7 An Abridgment of the Acts of the General Assemblies of the Church of Scotland, from the year 1638 to 1802 inclusive, ed. Gillan, R., Hawick, 1803, 120Google Scholar; Short, Pioneers, 16–21.
8 For some examples see John, Seed, The Role of Unitarianism in the Formation of Liberal Culture, 1775–1851: A social history, unpubl. PhD diss., Hull University 1981. 54–5.Google Scholar
10 Hobhouse, B., A Treatise on Heresy, as cognizable by the Spiritual Courts. And an Examination of the Statute gth and 10th of William III c. 32, London 1792.Google Scholar
11 Priestley, Joseph, An Appeal to the public, on the Subject of the Riots in Birmingham, Birmingham 1792, 15–16Google Scholar . He exaggerated the term of imprisonment from three years to life.
13 Monthly Repository xx (1825), 338–9.
14 Havard, N., A Narrative of the Origin and Progress of the Prosecution against the Rev. Edward Evanson, late Vicar of Tewkesbury, London 1778.Google Scholar
15 Ditchfield, G.M., ‘The Revd. William Chambers, D.D’, Enlightenment and Dissent iv (1985), 3–12.Google Scholar
16 Hobhouse, Treatise, 104.
17 The Works of Samuel Parr, LL.D, 8 vols, London 1828, viii. 154–5.
20 Ian, R.Christie, Stress and Stability in late Eighteenth-century Britain: Reflections on the British avoidance of revolution, Oxford 1984, 143.Google Scholar
21 Cobbett, W., Parliamentary History of England, 1066–1803, 36 vols, London 1806–1820, xvii. 273.Google Scholar
22 Madan, Spencer, The Principal Claims of the Dissenters Considered, Birmingham 1790, 19–20.Google Scholar
26 Thomas, Belsham, Memoirs of the late Reverend Theophilus Lindsey, centenary ed, London 1873, 202.Google Scholar
27 See Michael, Watts, The Dissenters. From the Reformation to the French Revolution, Oxford 1978, 371–5.Google Scholar
28 Belsham, op. cit. 199.
30 Lindsey to William Frend, 12 Mar. 1791, CUL, Frend Papers.
31 Belsham, op. cit. 196–7.
32 Disney, op. cit. 27.
34 Monthly Review, NS ix (1792), 175.
35 James Wodrow to Samuel Kenrick, 16 June 1791, DWL, Kenrick Papers; Monthly Review, NS viii (1792), 580–1;Christopher, Wyvill, Political Papers, 6 vols, York 1794–1806, v. 16-17.Google Scholar
36 Lindsey to Frend, 12 Mar. 1791, Frend Papers; Lindsey to John Rowe, 6 Mar. 1792, JRL, Lindsey Correspondence.
37 Estlin to Belsham, 27 Feb. 1791, DWL, MSS 12. 48 (12). There is a list of the founding members of the Unitarian Society in Unitarian Society for Promoting Christian Knowledge, London 1791, 9–14, and in Seed, Unitarianism, 368–71.Google Scholar
38 Lindsey to William Turner of Wakefield, 28 Oct. 1786, DWL, Lindsey Correspondence. Price joined the Unitarian Society in 1791 but died in the same year.Google Scholar
39 Boswell: Laird of Auchinleck 1778–1782, ed. Reed, Joseph W. and Pottle, Frederick A., London 1977, 295.Google Scholar
40 David L. Wykes, ‘Dissenting academy or Unitarian seminary? Manchester College at York, 1803–40’, TUHS xi 2 (1988), 102–12.Google Scholar
41 The Case of Charles Le Grice, Norwich 1788;Knight, F., University Rebel. The life of William Frend, 1757–1841, London 1971, 61–2; article on George Dyer in DNB.Google Scholar
44 J. C. D. Clark writes, ‘Dissenters’ early satisfaction with “toleration” can be read in two ways: as proof of society‘s objective attainment of that state or as evidence for orthodox Dissenters’ affinities with orthodox Anglicans, until the recrudescence of Dissenting heterodoxy transformed Dissenters‘ perceptions of their status’: ‘On hitting the buffers: the historiography of England’s ancien regime: a response‘, Past and Present cxvii (1987), 204 n. 28. Clark rightly prefers the second alternative, although one should add the crucial proviso that in the later eighteenth century many orthodox dissenters regarded the existing toleration laws as welcome protection against Socinianism and wanted them preserved. Their view of’ toleration' became more, not less, favourable.
45 See F. C. Mather, ‘ Georgian churchmanship reconsidered: some variations in Anglican public worship, 1714–1830’, this JOURNAL xxxvi (1985), 255–83.Google Scholar
46 Lindsey to Frend, 14 Feb. 1791, Frend Papers; Kenrick to Wodrow, 10 June 1791, Kenrick Papers; Belsham, Memoirs of Lindsey, 200.Google Scholar
47 Belsham, op. cit. 199.
48 Disney, J., A Dialogue between a Clergyman of the Church of England and a Lay-Gentleman, London 1792, 19.Google Scholar
50 Felix Farley's Bristol Journal, 5 May 1791, Timothy Kenrick to Samuel Kenrick, 15 Mar. 1791, JRL, Kenrick MSS.Google Scholar
51 Lindsey to William Tayleur, 9 Feb. 1791; JRL, Lindsey Correspondence; Parl. Hist. xxix 1,393.Google Scholar
54 Wodrow to Kenrick, 10 Jan. 1791, Kenrick Papers.
55 Lindsey to Tayleur, 9 Apr. 1791, JRL, Lindsey Correspondence.
56 Kenrick to Wodrow, 1–2 Mar. 1791, Kenrick Papers.
57 Wodrow to Kenrick, 28 Mar. 1791, Kenrick Papers.
58 Address from the General Assembly of the Church of Scotland to George m, 19 May 1792, PRO, Home Office Papers 102 (Scotland) 5, fo. 52.Google Scholar
61 Historical Manuscripts Commission, Laing MSS, ii. 548; Hill, Andrew M., ‘The successors of the Remnant: a bicentenary account of St Mark’s Unitarian Church, Edinburgh. Part I: before 1776 until 1822', TUHS xvi/3, (1977), 121 n. 47.Google Scholar
63 Memoirs of the Life of Sir Samuel Romilly, written by himself, 3 vols, London 1840, i. 444.Google Scholar
64 JHC, xcvii. 823–4, 1,089;Hutton, W., The History of Birmingham, Birmingham 1835, 206.Google Scholar
65 The Correspondence of Edmund Burke vii, ed. Marshall, P.J. and Woods, John A., Cambridge 1967, 119.Google Scholar
67 Gentleman's Magazine lxi (1791), 924–7; Lindsey to Tayleur, 19 Sept. 1791, JRL, Lindsey Correspondence.Google Scholar
68 Parl. Hist. xxvi. 818; Lindsey to Russell Scott, 21 Feb. 1792, Scott Collection kindly communicated by the Revd Dr H. John McLachlan.Google Scholar
70 Martin, Fitzpatrick, ‘Joseph Priestley and the cause of universal toleration’, Price-Priestley Newsletter i (1977) 3–30, and idem, ‘Toleration and truth’, Enlightenment and Dissent i (1982), 3–31.Google Scholar
71 Lindsey to Tayleur, 1 Mar. 1791, JRL Lindsey Correspondence; DWL, Odgers MSS, 93 H7.Google Scholar
72 Lindsey to Frend, 12 Mar. 1791, Frend Papers;The Works, Literary, Moral and Medical of Thomas Percival, 4 vols, London 1807, i. p. clxviii.Google Scholar
74 F. C. Mather, ‘Church, parliament and penal laws: some Anglo-Scottish interactions in the eighteenth century’, EHR xcii (1977), 540–72.Google Scholar
79 Parry, Notably W., Thoughts on such Penal Statutes as affect the Protestant Dissenters, London 1791, and C. Wyvill, A Defence of Dr Price and the Reformers of England, London 1792.Google Scholar
80 The Works, Theological, Medical, Political and Miscellaneous of John Jebb… with Memoirs of the Life of the Author by John, Disney, 3 vols, London 1787, 1. ix-xxiiGoogle Scholar ;The Works of Nathaniel Lardner… with Life of the Author by Andrew, Kippis, 11 vols, London 1788, list of subscribers (pages not numbered) in vol. i.Google Scholar
83 Seed, John, ‘Gentlemen dissenters: the social and political meanings of rational dissent in the 1770s and 1780s’, Historical Journal xxviii (1985), 308–9, 319–20.Google Scholar
84 Lindsey to Tayleur, 9 Apr. 1791, JRL, Lindsey Correspondence; Morning Chronicle, 5 Nov. 1791; Kentish Gazette, 10 Feb. 1792.Google Scholar
85 Fox to Fitzwilliam, 16 Mar. 1792, Northants. Record Office, Fitzwilliam Correspondence, drawer 44. The ‘other wing of the Coalition’ is a reference to the followers of the North.Google Scholar
89 Rutt, J. T., The Life and Correspondence of Joseph Priestley, 2 vols, London 1831-1832, ii. 181–2.Google Scholar
81 Lindsey to Tayleur, 26 Mar. 1792, JRL, Lindsey Correspondence; Morning Chronicle, 9 Mar. 1792.Google Scholar
93 I hope to examine the petitioning campaign, and the support which it generated, in a separate article.Google Scholar
96 Selections from the Papers of the London Corresponding Society, ed. Mary, Thale, Cambridge 1985, 19, xxiv.Google Scholar
99 Manchester Mercury, 22 May, 5 June 1792Google Scholar ;Manchester Herald, 9 June 1792Google Scholar ;Gordon, A., Historical Account of Dob Lane Chapel, Failsworth, Manchester 1904, 41–2Google Scholar ;McLachlan, H., Essays and Addresses, Manchester 1950, 112–29Google Scholar ;Booth, A., ‘Popular loyalism and public violence in the north-west of England, 1790-1800’, Social History viii (1983), 295–313.Google Scholar
109 William, Wilberforce, A Practical View of the prevailing Religious System of professed Christians, in the higher and middle classes in this Country; contrasted with real Christianity, London 1797. 475.Google Scholar
110 For some examples, see Watts, , The Dissenters, 468–9, and Seed, Unitarianism, 53–4.Google Scholar
111 Ditchfield, G. M., ‘The subscription issue in British parliamentary politics, 1772-1779’, Parliamentary History vii (1988), 58–9, 78.Google Scholar
112 Rack, Henry D., ‘Early Methodist visions of the Trinity’, Proceedings of the Wesley Historical Society xlvi/3 (1987), 65–9.Google Scholar
115 Reid, W. H., The Rise and Dissolution of the Infidel Societies in this Metropolis, 2nd edn, London 1800, 89, 19.Google Scholar
117 See especially Joshua, Toulmin, The Injustice of classing Unitarians with Deists and Infidels, London 1797.Google Scholar
119 Jeremy, Bentham to William, Smith, Feb. 1818, printed in the introduction to his Church of Englandism and its Catechism examined, London 1818.Google Scholar
126 D. Bellenger, ‘The emigre clergy and the English Church, 1789–1815’, this JOURNAL xxxiv (1983), 392–410.Google Scholar
127 Horsley‘s letter to the clergy of St David’s, May 1793, quoted in David, Jones, The Welsh Freeholder‘s Farewell Epistles to the Right Rev. Samuel Lord Bishop (lately ofSt David’s) now of Rochester, London 1794, pp. viii-ix.Google Scholar
130 Ditchfield, G. M., ‘A Unitarian view ofEnglish dissent in 1807’, TUHS xviii (1984), 80;Google Scholar Dean Rapp,‘ The left-wing Whigs: Whitbread, the mountain and reform, 1809–1815’, JBSxxi (1982), 38–40. Richard, Brent, Liberal Anglican Politics: Whiggery, religion and reform 1830–1841, Oxford 1987, was writing of a significantly later period in his exposition of an affinity between certain varieties of Whiggery and a broad church, liberal Anglicanism.Google Scholar
131 J. A. Phillips, Electoral Behaviour in Unreformed England: Plumpers, Splitters and Straights, Princeton 1982, 292 ff.Google Scholar
133 Wyvill to Samuel Whitbread MP, 22 Nov. 1809, 5 May 1811, 10 Feb. 1812, Beds. County Record Office, Whitbread Papers, W1/4290, W1/4309, W1/4335,Google Scholar