Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-mp689 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-17T18:19:00.870Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false


Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 May 2021


Civil society actors collectively organized online and offline to nominate themselves and oppose the Vietnamese Communist Party in the 2016 legislative election. The level of opposition coordination among these independent self-nominees exceeded and qualitatively differed from previous atomized attempts in the 2011 election. External shifts in the political opportunity structure offer only a partial explanation for the increased coordination among independent candidates in Vietnam's 2016 self-nomination movement. In this article, I theorize that it is the combination of both opportunity structure and overlapping linkages across spheres of social contention and civil society, all accumulated from a prior history of protests and activism, that provide the conditions for the emergence of independent self-nominees and opposition coordination in single-party-elections. In Vietnam, a cumulative process of participation in social contention and civil society organizations during 2011 to 2016 allowed actors to develop linkages that strengthened their repertoires of contention and resonant frames of collective action. These linkages, combined with favorable political opportunities, effectively facilitated greater mobilization and coordination among independent self-nominees in the 2016 election.

Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the East Asia Institute

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)



Abuza, Zachary. 2001. Renovating Politics in Contemporary Vietnam. Boulder: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
Abuza, Zachary. 2016. “Vietnam's 12th Party Congress.” The Diplomat, March 01. Accessed July 13, 2019. Scholar
Arriola, Leonardo R. 2012. Multi-Ethnic Coalitions in Africa: Business Financing of Opposition Election Campaigns. New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139108553CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beissinger, Mark R. 2002. Nationalist Mobilization and the Collapse of the Soviet State. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511613593CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bland, Ben. 2012. “Vinashin Executives Go On Trial in Vietnam,” Financial Times, March 27, Accessed July 13, 2019.Google Scholar
Blaydes, Lisa. 2011. Elections and Distributive Politics in Mubarak's Egypt. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Boix, Carles, and Svolik, Milan W.. 2013. “The Foundations of Limited Authoritarian Government: Institutions, Commitment, and Power-Sharing in Dictatorships.” Journal of Politics 75 (2): 300316.10.1017/S0022381613000029CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boudreau, Vincent. 2001. Grass Roots and Cadre in the Protest Movement. Quezon City: Ateneo de Manila University Press.Google Scholar
Brownlee, Jason. 2007. Authoritarianism in an Age of Democratization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511802348CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bui, Ngoc Son. 2016. “Vietnamese Constitutional Debate in Comparative Perspective.” Asian Journal of Comparative Law 11 (02): 189191.10.1017/asjcl.2016.20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bui, Thiem H. 2018. “Dilemmas in the Construction of a Socialist Law-Based State in Vietnam: Electoral Integrity and Reform.” Asian Studies Review 42 (2): 286303.10.1080/10357823.2018.1451490CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bunce, Valerie, and Wolchik, Sharon L.. 2011. Defeating Authoritarian Leaders in Postcommunist Countries. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511977404CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cong An. 2015. “Chat 6.700 cay xanh: Ong Tran Dang Tuan viet thu ngo gui Chu tich Ha Noi” [Cutting 6,700 Green Trees: Tran Dang Tuan Writes Open Letter to Chairman of the People's Committee of Hanoi]. VTC News, March 17, Accessed June 19, 2019.Google Scholar
“Dieu gi phia sau trao luu ‘o at tu ung cu’?” [What Is Behind the ‘Bustling Trend of Self-Nomination’?]. 2016. People's Army Newspaper, March 8, Accessed June 9, 2019.Google Scholar
Eisinger, Peter K. 1973. “The Conditions of Protest Behavior in American Cities.” The American Political Science Review 67 (1): 1128.10.2307/1958525CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gamson, William, and Meyer, David S.. 1996. “Framining Political Opportunity.” In Comparative Perspectives on Social Movements: Political Opportunities, Mobilizing Structures, and Cultural Framings, edited by McAdam, Doug, McCarthy, John D. and Zald, Mayer N., 275291. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511803987.014CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gandhi, Jennifer. 2008. Political Institutions under Dictatorship. Leiden: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511510090CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gandhi, Jennifer, and Przeworski, Adam. 2006. “Cooperation, Cooptation, and Rebellion under Dictatorships.” Economics & Politics 18 (1): 126.10.1111/j.1468-0343.2006.00160.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gandhi, Jennifer, and Reuter, Ora John. 2013. “The Incentives for Pre-Eectoral Coalitions in Non-Democratic Elections.” Democratization 20 (1): 137159.10.1080/13510347.2013.738865CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geddes, Barbara, et al. 2018. “Why Parties and Elections in Dictatorships?” In How Dictatorships Work: Power, Personalization, and Collapse, edited by Geddes, Barbara, et al. ., 129153. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781316336182.006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodwin, Jeff, and Jasper, James M., eds. 2003. Rethinking Social Movements: Structure, Meaning, and Emotion. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Granovetter, Mark. 1978. “Threshold Models of Collective Behavior,” American Journal of Sociology 83 (6): 14201443.10.1086/226707CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nhi, Hong. 2015. “Chat cay xanh Ha Noi khong phai hoi dan” [Cutting Down Trees Hanoi Does Not Need to Ask the People]. VietnamNet, March 17, Accessed June 8, 2019.Google Scholar
Nhi, Hong. 2016. “Tao khong khi bau cu dan chu, coi mo” [Creating a Democratic, Open Election Atmosphere]. VietnamNet, March 13, Accessed June 10, 2019.Google Scholar
Howard, Marc Morjé, and Roessler, Philip G.. 2006. “Liberalizing Electoral Outcomes in Competitive Authoritarian Regimes.” American Journal of Political Science 50 (2): 365381.10.1111/j.1540-5907.2006.00189.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
“It nguoi tu ung cu dai bieu Quoc hoi” [Few self-nominees for the National Assembly]. 2011. BBC News Vietnamese, March 22, Accesssed May 18, 2020.Google Scholar
Kerkvliet, Benedict J. 2015. “Regime Critics: Democratization Advocates in Vietnam, 1990s-2014.” Critical Asian Studies 47 (3): 359387.10.1080/14672715.2015.1057027CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kerkvliet, Benedict J. 2019. Speaking out in Vietnam: Public Political Criticism in a Communist Party-Ruled Nation. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.10.7591/9781501736391CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kitschelt, Herbert P. 1986. “Political Opportunity Structures and Political Protest: Anti-Nuclear Movements in Four Democracies.” British Journal of Political Science 16 (1): 5785.10.1017/S000712340000380XCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koh, David. 2006. Wards of Hanoi. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.10.1355/9789812305961CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koh, David. 2012a. The Sixth Plenum in Vietnam: Thunder without Rain. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.Google Scholar
Koh, David. 2012b. “Vietnam: A Glass Half Full or Half Empty?Southeast Asian Affairs 2012: 361378.Google Scholar
Le, Quang Binh, Ha, Doan Thi, Thu Nam, Nguyen Thi, and Tu, Mai Thanh. 2015. Report on Movements to Protect #6700 Trees in Ha Noi. Hanoi: Hong Duc.Google Scholar
Lindberg, Staffan I. 2006. Democracy and Elections in Africa. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Lindberg, Staffan I. 2009. Democratization by Elections: A New Mode of Transition. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Lipsky, Michael. 1970. Protest in City Politics: Rent Strikes, Housing, and the Power of the Poor. Chicago: Rand McNally.Google Scholar
Lust-Okar, Ellen. 2006. “Elections under Authoritarianism: Preliminary Lessons from Jordan.” Democratization 13 (3): 456471.10.1080/13510340600579359CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Magaloni, Beatriz. 2006. Voting for Autocracy: Hegemonic Party Survival and Its Demise in Mexico. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511510274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Magaloni, Beatriz. 2008. “Credible Power-Sharing and the Longevity of Authoritarian Rule.Comparative Political Studies 41 (4–5): 715741.10.1177/0010414007313124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malesky, Edmund. 2014a. “Understanding the Confidence Vote in Vietnamese National Assembly: An Update on ‘Adverse Effects of Sunshine’.” In Politics in Contemporary Vietnam: Party, State, and Authority Relations, edited by London, Jonathan D., 8499. Basingstoke: Macmillan.10.1057/9781137347534_5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malesky, Edmund. 2014b. “Vietnam in 2013 Single-Party Politics in the Internet Age.” Asian Survey 54 (1): 3038.10.1525/as.2014.54.1.30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malesky, Edmund, and Schuler, Paul. 2009. “Paint-by-Numbers Democracy: The Stakes, Structure, and Results of the 2007 Vietnamese National Assembly Election.” Journal of Vietnamese Studies 4 (1): 148.10.1525/vs.2009.4.1.1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malesky, Edmund, and Schuler, Paul. 2011. “The Single-Party Dictator's Dilemma: Information in Elections without Opposition.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 36 (4): 491530.10.1111/j.1939-9162.2011.00025.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malesky, Edmund, Schuler, Paul, and Tran, Anh. 2011. “Vietnam: Familiar Patterns and New Developments Ahead of the 11th Party Congress.Southeast Asian Affairs: 339363.Google Scholar
McAdam, Doug. 1999. Political Process and the Development of Black Insurgency, 1930–1970. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226555553.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McAdam, Doug, McCarthy, John D., and Zald, Mayer N.. 1996. “Introduction: Opportunities, Mobilizing Structures and Framing Processes.” In Comparative Perspectives on Social Movements, edited by McAdam, Doug, McCarthy, John D., and Zald, Mayer N., 120. New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511803987CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoa, Minh. 2016. “Ung cu vien DBQH co duoc van dong tranh cu qua mang xa hoi?” [Can NA Candidates Campaign for Election on Social Media?]. VOV, February 24, Accessed May 10, 2016.Google Scholar
Morris-Jung, Jason. 2015. “The Vietnamese Bauxite Controversy Towards a More Oppositional Politics.” Journal of Vietnamese Studies 10 (1): 63109.10.1525/vs.2015.10.1.63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nguyen, Hai Hong. 2016a. “Are Vietnam's elections becoming more democratic?” EastAsiaForum, March 23, Accessed February 15, 2020.Google Scholar
Nguyen, Hung Quoc. 2016b. “Phong trao tu ung cu vao Quoc hoi tai Viet Nam” [Self-Nomination Movement for the National Assembly in Vietnam]. Voice of America (VOA), February 17, Accessed February 15, 2020.Google Scholar
Nguyen, Quang A. 2016a. “Hay ung cu de bien quyen ao dan thanh quyen thuc va giup ong Trong chung minh ‘dan chu den the la cung’” [Let's Stand for Election to Make a Virtual Right Gradually Become an Actual Right and to Help Mr. Trong Demonstrate ‘Democracy Is by That Much’]. Facebook, February 4, Scholar
Nguyen, Quang A. 2016b. “Tam diem chinh can luu y trong bau cu 2016” [Eight Key Points of Notice in the 2016 Nomination]. Facebook, February 22, Scholar
Nguyen, Quang A. 2016c. “Tinh nguyen vien va ban thu ky bau cu” [Volunteers and Election Secretariat]. Facebook, February 6, Scholar
Nguyen, Thanh, and Dung, Viet. 2016. “Tong Bi thu Nguyen Phu Trong: ‘Khong co dan chu nao hon’” [General Secretary Nguyen Phu Truong: ‘No More Democratic Than This]. Da Nang Newspaper, January 28, Accessed June 19, 2019.Google Scholar
Paddock, Richard C. 2016. “Taiwan-Owned Steel Factory Caused Toxic Spill, Vietnam Says.” New York Times, June 30, Accessed June 9, 2019.Google Scholar
Petty, Martin. 2016. “In Vietnam, Outrage and Optimism as Party Thwarts Democratic Experiment,” Reuters, Accessed March 15, 2020.Google Scholar
Phan, Thao. 2016. “Lam kho nguoi tu ung cu DBQH la vi pham phap luat” [Causing difficulty for self-nominees for NA delegates is a violation of the law]. Saigon Giai Phong, March 15, Accessed June 10, 2019.Google Scholar
Pierson, Paul. 2004. Politics in Time: History, Institutions, and Social Analysis. Princeton: Princeton University Press.10.1515/9781400841080CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Minh, Quang. 2016. “Ca nuoc co 162 nguoi tu ung cu dai bieu Quoc hoi khoa XIV” [The entire country has 162 self-nominees for the 14th NA]. Ministry of Home Affairs, March 30, Accessed July 20, 2019.Google Scholar
Quoc, Thanh. 2012. “Quoc hoi chat van Thu tuong” [National Assembly questioned the Prime Minister]. Tuoi Tre, November 15, Accessed July 13, 2019.Google Scholar
Salomon, Matthieu. 2007. “Power and Representation at the Vietnamese National Assembly.” In Vietnam's New Order: International Perspectives on the State and Reform in Vietnam, edited by Balme, Stéphanie and Sidel, Mark, 198216. New York: Macmillan.10.1057/9780230601970_12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sang, Truong Tan. 2012. “Chu tich Sang noi ve ‘dong chi X’“ [President Sang Talks about ‘Comrade X’]. BBC News Vietnam, October 17, Accessed December 17, 2018.Google Scholar
Schedler, Andreas. 2002. “The Menu of Manipulation.” Journal of Democracy 13 (2): 3650.10.1353/jod.2002.0031CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snow, David A. 2004. “Framing Processes, Ideology, and Discursive Fields.” In The Blackwell Companion to Social Movements, edited by Snow, David A., Soule, Sarah Anne and Kriesi, Hanspeter, 380412. Malden, MA: Blackwell.10.1002/9780470999103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snow, David A., and Benford, Robert D.. 1988. “Ideology, Frame Resonance, and Participant Mobilization.” In From Structure to Action: Social Movement Participation Across Cultures, edited by Klandermans, Bert, Kriesi, Hanspeter, and Tarrow, Sidney, 197217. Greenwich: JAI Press.Google Scholar
Steinglass, Matt 2010. “Vietnam Assembly Derails High-Speed Rail Link.” Financial Times, June 21, Accessed April 9, 2020.Google Scholar
Tarrow, Sidney G. 1994. Power in Movement: Social Movements and Contentious Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Thayer, Carlyle A. 2009. “Vietnam and the Challenge of Political Civil Society.” Contemporary Southeast Asia 31 (1): 127.10.1355/CS31-1ACrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thayer, Carlyle A. 2010. “Political Legitimacy in Vietnam: Challenge and ResponsePolitics & Policy 38 (3): 423444.10.1111/j.1747-1346.2010.00242.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thelen, Kathleen. 1999. “Historical Institutionalism in Comparative PoliticsAnnual Review of Political Science 2: 369404.10.1146/annurev.polisci.2.1.369CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tilly, Charles. 1978. From Mobilization to Revolution. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Tilly, Charles. 1986. The Contentious French. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.10.4159/harvard.9780674433984CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tilly, Charles. 1993. “Social Movements as Historically Specific Clusters of Political Performances.” Berkeley Journal of Sociology 38: 130.Google Scholar
Tilly, Charles, and Tarrow, Sidney G.. 2015. Contentious Politics. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Van Dong Ung Cu Dai Bieu Quoc Hoi. 2016. [Campaign for the Nomination of 2016 NA Delegates]. 2016a. “Bao dong ve nang luc va dao duc cua can bo phuong” [Caution about the capacity and character of ward cadres]. Facebook, Scholar
Van Dong Ung Cu Dai Bieu Quoc Hoi. 2016b. “Cac ung cu vien tu do vao vi tri dai bieu Quoc hoi” [Independent candidates for NA delegates]. Facebook, Scholar
Van Dong Ung Cu Dai Bieu Quoc Hoi. 2016c. “Quan triet trung cu” [Elucidation on Being Elected]. Facebook, Scholar
Vo, Hai. 2016a. “11 Nguoi tu ung cu Quoc hoi lot qua vong cuoi” [11 self-nominees for the NA passed the last round]. VnExpress, April 26, Accessed June 10, 2019.Google Scholar
Vo, Hai. 2016b. “Vi sao ong Tran Dang Tuan bi loai khoi danh sach ung cu” [Why was Tran Dang Tuan eliminated from the candidate list?]. VnExpress, April 19, Accessed July 20, 2019.Google Scholar
Vo, Hai. 2016c. “Toan bo 48 nguoi tu ung cu Quoc hoi o Ha Noi da duoc thong qua [All 48 self-nominees for the National Assembly in Hanoi have been passed].” VnExpress, March 17, Accessed February 15, 2020.Google Scholar
Vong, Duc. 2016. “Can tinh tao truoc nhung thu doan pha hoai cuoc bau cu Quoc hoi khoa XIV” [Necessary to be alert before plots to impair the election for the XIV NA]. People's Army Newspaper, February 22, Accessed June 9, 2019.Google Scholar
Weiss, Meredith L. 2006. Protest and Possibilities: Civil Society and Coalitions for Political Change in Malaysia. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Xuan, Long. 2016. “To chuc phan dong dung sau mot so nguoi tu ung cu Quoc hoi [Subversive organization stands behind some self-nominees for the National Assembly].” Tuoi Tre, March 15, Accessed February 15, 2020.Google Scholar