Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-ph5wq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-29T06:21:58.738Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Son preference and low birth weight for girls

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 June 2022

Hyunkuk Cho*
Affiliation:
Yeungnam University, School of Economics and Finance, 280 Daehak-ro, Gyeongsan, 712-749, Korea
*
Corresponding author. E-mail: hkcho@ynu.ac.kr
Get access

Abstract

While previous studies have confirmed the negative effects of son preference on the prenatal care received by girls, few have examined its effect on birth outcomes. This study contributes to the literature on son preference by examining this relationship. The degree of son preference is measured by the sex ratio at birth, and the data were obtained from the birth registry of South Korea, which has a long history of strong son preference. We find that girls are more likely to be born with low birth weight when son preference is stronger. In addition, when son preference is stronger, girls are more likely to be born outside hospitals, which implies that mothers conceiving girls make fewer prenatal visits to the hospital when their son preference is stronger.

Type
Research Paper
Copyright
Copyright © Université catholique de Louvain 2022

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ahsan, M. N. and Maharaj, R. (2018) Parental human capital and child health at birth in India. Economics & Human Biology 30, 130149.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Almond, D., Edlund, L., Li, H. and Zhang, J. (2010) Long-term effects of early-life development: evidence from the 1959 to 1961 China famine. In T. Ito and A. Rose (eds.), The Economic Consequences of Demographic Change in East Asia, NBER-EASE Volume 19, pp. 321345. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Almond, D., Edlund, L. and Palme, M. (2009) Chernobyl's subclinical legacy: prenatal exposure to radioactive fallout and school outcomes in Sweden. Quarterly Journal of Economics 124(4), 17291772.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, R. and Bergström, S. (1998) Is maternal malnutrition associated with a low sex ratio at birth? Human Biology 70(6), 11011106.Google Scholar
Barcellos, S. H., Carvalho, L. S. and Lleras-Muney, A. (2014) Child gender and parental investments in India: are boys and girls treated differently? American Economic Journal: Applied Economics 6(1), 157189.Google ScholarPubMed
Bhalotra, S., Brulé, R. and Roy, S. (2020) Women's inheritance rights reform and the preference for sons in India. Journal of Development Economics 146, 102275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bhalotra, S. and Cochrane, T. (2010). Where have all the young girls gone? Identification of sex selection in India. IZA Discussion Paper No. 5381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bharadwaj, P., Eberhard, J. P. and Neilson, C. A. (2018) Health at birth, parental investments, and academic outcomes. Journal of Labor Economics 36(2), 349394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bharadwaj, P. and Lakdawala, L. K. (2013) Discrimination begins in the womb: evidence of sex-selective prenatal investments. Journal of Human Resources 48(1), 71113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bozzoli, C. and Quintana-Domeque, C. (2014) The weight of the crisis: evidence from newborns in Argentina. Review of Economics and Statistics 96(3), 550562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cameron, A. C., Gelbach, J. B. and Miller, D. L. (2008) Bootstrap-based improvements for inference with clustered errors. Review of Economics and Statistics 90(3), 414427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, Y., Li, H. and Meng, L. (2013) Prenatal sex selection and missing girls in China: evidence from the diffusion of diagnostic ultrasound. Journal of Human Resources 48(1), 3670.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Choe, S.-H. (2007). South Koreans rethink preference for sons. New York Times, 28 November. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/2007/11/28/world/asia/28iht-sex.1.8509372.html?_r=1&.Google Scholar
Choi, E. J. and Hwang, J. (2020) Transition of son preference: evidence from South Korea. Demography 57, 627652.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chung, W. and Gupta, M. D. (2007) The decline of son preference in South Korea: the roles of development and public policy. Population and Development Review 33(4), 757783.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarke, D., Oreffice, S. and Quintana-Domeque, C. (2021) On the value of birth weight. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 83(5), 03059049.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conley, D. and Bennett, N. G. (2001) Birth weight and income: interactions across generations. Journal of Health and Social Behavior 42(4), 450465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conti, G., Hanson, M., Inskip, H., Crozier, S., Cooper, C. and Godfrey, K. M. (2020). Beyond birthweight: The origins of human capital. IZA Discussion Paper No. 13296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Currie, J. and Rossin-Slater, M. (2013) Weathering the storm: hurricanes and birth outcomes. Journal of Health Economics 32(3), 487503.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dagnelie, O., De Luca, G. D. and Maystadt, J. F. (2018) Violence, selection and infant mortality in Congo. Journal of Health Economics 59, 153177.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Den Boer, A. and Hudson, V. (2017) Patrilineality, son preference, and sex selection in South Korea and Vietnam. Population and Development Review 43(1), 119147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Oliveira, V. H., Lee, I. and Quintana-Domeque, C. (forthcoming). Natural disasters and early human development: Hurricane Catarina and infant health in Brazil. Journal of Human Resources, 0816-8144R1.Google Scholar
Ebenstein, A. (2010) The “missing girls” of China and the unintended consequences of the one child policy. Journal of Human Resources 45(1), 87115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edlund, L. and Lee, C. (2013). Son preference, sex selection and economic development: The case of South Korea (No. w18679). National Bureau of Economic Research.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Figlio, D., Guryan, J., Karbownik, K. and Roth, J. (2014) The effects of poor neonatal health on children's cognitive development. American Economic Review 104(12), 39213955.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fukuda, M., Fukuda, K., Shimizu, T. and Møller, H. (1998) Decline in sex ratio at birth after Kobe earthquake. Human Reproduction 13(8), 23212322.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gajate-Garrido, G. (2013) The impact of adequate prenatal care on urban birth outcomes: an analysis in a developing country context. Economic Development and Cultural Change 62(1), 95130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gendercide (2010). The Economist. Retrieved from http://www.economist.com/node/15606229.Google Scholar
Goisis, A., Remes, H., Martikainen, P., Klemetti, R. and Myrskylä, M. (2019) Medically assisted reproduction and birth outcomes: a within-family analysis using Finnish population registers. The Lancet 393(10177), 12251232.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
González, L. (2018) Sex selection and health at birth among Indian immigrants. Economics & Human Biology 29, 6475.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Guilmoto, C. Z. (2015) Mapping the diversity of gender preferences and sex imbalances in Indonesia in 2010. Population Studies 69(3), 299315.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hafeez, N. and Quintana-Domeque, C. (2018) Son preference and gender-biased breastfeeding in Pakistan. Economic Development and Cultural Change 66(2), 179215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hong, M., Lee, S., Chang, Y., Oh, Y. and Kye, H. (1994) The 1994 National fertility and family health survey. Korea Institute for Health and Social Affairs Working paper.Google Scholar
Hu, L. and Schlosser, A. (2015) Prenatal sex selection and girls’ well-being: evidence from India. Economic Journal 125(587), 12271261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jayachandran, S. (2017) Fertility decline and missing women. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics 9(1), 118139.Google Scholar
Jayachandran, S. and Kuziemko, I. (2011) Why do mothers breastfeed girls less than boys? Evidence and implications for child health in India. Quarterly Journal of Economics 126(3), 14851538.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jensen, R. (2012) Do labor market opportunities affect young women's work and family decisions? Experimental evidence from India. Quarterly Journal of Economics 127(2), 753792.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaul, T. (2018) Intra-household allocation of educational expenses: gender discrimination and investing in the future. World Development 104, 336343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korean Women's Association United. (2011). NGO shadow report: Republic of Korea, http://www2.ohchr.org/english/bodies/cedaw/docs/ngos/KWAU_RepublicKorea49.pdf.Google Scholar
Kumar, A. (2013) Preference based vs. market based discrimination: implications for gender differentials in child labor and schooling. Journal of Development Economics 105, 6468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larsen, U., Chung, W. and Gupta, M. D. (1998) Fertility and son preference in Korea. Population Studies 52(3), 317325.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lhila, A. and Simon, K. I. (2008) Prenatal health investment decisions: does the child's sex matter? Demography 45(4), 885905.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McGovern, M. E. (2019) How much does birth weight matter for child health in developing countries? Estimates from siblings and twins. Health Economics 28(1), 322.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
National Statistical Office. (2017). 2016 Vital statistics (written in Korean) https://kostat.go.kr/portal/korea/kor_nw/1/1/index.board?bmode=read&aSeq=359243.Google Scholar
Oh, Y., Kim, K., Shin, C. and Bae, H. (2016) A study of fertility changes in Korea: Based on national fertility and family health survey (1974–2012). Korea Institute for Health and Social Affairs. Working paper 2016–21.Google Scholar
Oster, E. (2009) Proximate causes of population gender imbalance in India. Demography 46(2), 325339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Qian, N. (2008) Missing women and the price of tea in China: the effect of sex-specific earnings on sex imbalance. Quarterly Journal of Economics 123(3), 12511285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Restrepo-Méndez, M. C., Lawlor, D. A., Horta, B. L., Matijasevich, A., Santos, I. S., Menezes, A., Barros, F. C. and Victora, C. (2014) The association of maternal age with birthweight and gestational age: a cross-cohort comparison. Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology 29, 3140.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sanders, N. J. and Stoecker, C. (2015) Where have all the young men gone? Using sex ratios to measure fetal death rates. Journal of Health Economics 41, 3045.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sohn, M., Kang, M., Chang, S., Kim, H., Park, K., Nam, J., Kang, D., et al. (2011) National survey on trends of induced abortion. Ministry of Health and Welfare. No.11-1352000-000522-01.Google Scholar
Sonchak, L. (2015) Medicaid reimbursement, prenatal care and infant health. Journal of Health Economics 44, 1024.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Trivers, R. L. and Willard, D. E. (1973) Natural selection of parental ability to vary the sex ratio of offspring. Science 179(4068), 9092.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Valente, C. (2015) Civil conflict, gender-specific fetal loss, and selection: a new test of the Trivers–Willard hypothesis. Journal of Health Economics 39, 3150.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wu, H. (2021) Maternal stress and sex ratio at birth in Sweden over two and a half centuries: a retest of the Trivers–Willard hypothesis. Human Reproduction 36(10), 27822792.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Cho supplementary material

Appendix

Download Cho supplementary material(File)
File 153.2 KB