Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-tn8tq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-23T10:06:47.553Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The use of short-term secretion rate measurements for estimating the milk production of suckler cows

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2009

Y. L. P. Le Du
Affiliation:
The Grassland Research Institute, Hurley, Maidenhead, Berks, SL6 5LR
R. D. Baker
Affiliation:
The Grassland Research Institute, Hurley, Maidenhead, Berks, SL6 5LR
J. M. Barker
Affiliation:
The Grassland Research Institute, Hurley, Maidenhead, Berks, SL6 5LR

Summary

Two experiments with dairy cows and one with suckler cows and their calves were conducted to examine the use of secretion rate measurements for estimating total milk production. In the first experiment both 4- and 6- h intervals between measurements gave similar estimates of total 7-d milk yield. The second experiment compared estimated and measured milk composition as well as yield. Milk and solids-not-fat yields were underestimated with dairy cows as a result of an extended milking interval before measurement. However, fat yield was overestimated, indicating that all residual milk was not removed at the first oxytocinaided milking. It was concluded that for the beef cow, previous interval effects would be eliminated by the frequency of calf suckling, but that residual milk effects might cause a 3–6% and a 16% overestimation of milk and fat yields respectively.

In the third experiment, the milk yield of suckler cows was estimated from measurements of secretion rate and from changes in calf weight; good agreement was obtained provided there were at least 3 consecutive controlled sucklings.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Proprietors of Journal of Dairy Research 1978

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Elliott, G. M., Dodd, F. H. & Brumby, P. J. (1960). Journal of Dairy Research 27, 293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gifford, W. (1953). Arkansas Agricultural Experimental Station Bulletin no. 531.Google Scholar
Lamond, D. R., Holmes, J. H. G. & Haydock, K. P. (1969). Journal of Animal Science 29, 606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neville, W. E. Jr (1962). Journal of Animal Science 21, 315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rutledge, J. J., Robison, O. W., Ahlschwede, W. T. & Legates, J. E. (1971). Journal of Animal Science 33, 563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wheelock, J. V., Rook, J. A. F., Dodd, F. H. & Griffin, T. K. (1966). Journal of Dairy Research 33, 161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar