Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-t6hkb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-13T22:38:00.980Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Screening and enumeration of lactic acid bacteria in milk using three different culture media in Petrifilm™ Aerobic Count plates and conventional pour plate methodology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 July 2007

Maria BT Ortolani ,
Gabriela N Viçosa ,
Vanerli Beloti  and
Luís A Nero
Maria BT Ortolani
Affiliation:
Departamento de Medicina Veterinária Preventiva, Centro de Ciências Agrárias, Universidade Estadual de Londrina, LondrinaPR, Brasil Departamento de Veterinária, Centro de Ciências Biológicas e da Saúde, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, ViçosaMG, Brasil
Gabriela N Viçosa
Affiliation:
Departamento de Veterinária, Centro de Ciências Biológicas e da Saúde, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, ViçosaMG, Brasil
Vanerli Beloti
Affiliation:
Departamento de Medicina Veterinária Preventiva, Centro de Ciências Agrárias, Universidade Estadual de Londrina, LondrinaPR, Brasil
Luís A Nero*
Affiliation:
Departamento de Veterinária, Centro de Ciências Biológicas e da Saúde, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, ViçosaMG, Brasil
*
*For correspondence; e-mail: nero@ufv.br
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This study aimed to compare Petrifilm™ Aerobic Count (AC) plates and the conventional pour plate methodology using de Mann-Rogosa-Sharpe (MRS), Kang-Fung (KF) and Kang-Fung-Sol (KFS) culture media for screening and enumeration of lactic acid bacteria (LAB) in milk. Suspensions of 10 LAB species in reconstituted powder skim milk and 30 raw milk samples, without experimental inoculation, were tested. For selective enumeration, all samples were previously diluted in MRS, KF and KFS broths and then plated in Petrifilm™ AC and conventional pour plate methodology, using the same culture media with added agar. All plates were incubated at 37°C for 48 h in anaerobic conditions. Differences in the counts were observed only for raw milk samples using KFS in conventional methodology, when compared with the counts obtained from MRS and KF (P⩽0·05). The results showed excellent correlation indexes between both methodologies using the three culture media for LAB suspensions (r=0·97 for MRS, KF and KFS). For raw milk samples, the correlation indexes were excellent (r=0·97, for MRS) and good (r=0·84 for KF, and r=0·82 for KFS), showing some interference in Petrifilm™ AC when supplements were added, especially lactic acid. These results indicate the possibility of using Petrifilm™ AC plates for enumeration of LAB in milk, even with the use of selective supplements.

Keywords

Lactic acid bacteriaPetrifilm™de Mann-Rogosa-SharpeKang-FungKang-Fung-Sol
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Dairy Research , Volume 74 , Issue 4 , November 2007 , pp. 387 - 391
Copyright
Copyright © Proprietors of Journal of Dairy Research 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Beloti, V, Barros, MAF, Freitas, JC, Nero, LA, Souza, JA, Santana, EHW & Franco, BDGM 1999 Frequency of 2,3,5-triphenyltetrazolium chloride (TTC) non-reducing bacteria in pasteurized milk. Revista de Microbiologia 30 137–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beloti, V, Barros, MAF, Nero, LA, Pachemshy, JAS, Santana, EHW & Franco, BDGM 2002 Quality of pasteurized milk influences the performance of ready-to-use systems for enumeration of aerobic microorganisms. International Dairy Journal 12 413–418CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beuchat, L, Copeland, RF & Curiale, MS 1998 Comparison of the Simplate™ total plate count method with Petrifilm™, Redigel™ and conventional pour-plate methods for enumerating aerobic microorganisms in foods. Journal of Food Protection 61 14–18CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Byrne, RDJ & Bishop, JR 1991 Evaluation of a dry medium culture plate (3M Petrifilm™ AC) for laboratory pasteurized count. Journal of Food Protection 54 308–309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Champagne, CP, Gardner, N, Piette, M & St-Gelais, T 1994 The use of Petrifilm™ for the enumeration of Lactococci. International Dairy Journal 4 789–795CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dawkins, GS, Hollingsworth, JB & Hamilton, MAE 2005 Incidences of problematic organisms on Petrifilm™ Aerobic Count Plates used to enumerate selected meat and dairy products. Journal of Food Protection 68 1506–1511CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
de Martinis, ECP, Alves, VF & Franco, BDGM 2002 Food bioconservation. Biotecnologia Ciência e Desenvolvimento 29 114–119Google Scholar
Ferrati, AR, Tavolaro, P, Destro, MT, Landgraf, M & Franco, BDGM 2005 A comparison of ready-to-use systems for evaluating the microbiological quality of acidic fruit juices using nonpasteurized orange juice as an experimental model. International Microbiology 8 49–53Google Scholar
Holzapfel, WH & Schillinger, U 2002 Introduction to pre- and probiotics. Food Research International 35 109–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kang, DH & Fung, DYC 1998 Comparison of Kang-Fung medium and MRS medium for screening Pediococcus spp. from mixed culture systems. Journal of Rapid Methods and Automation in Microbiology 6 77–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, S, Fung, DYC & Kang, DH 2001 Evaluation of Kang-Fung-Sol medium for selectivity of lactic acid bacteria from laboratory medium and ground beef. Journal of Rapid Methods and Automation in Microbiology 9 161–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leroy, F & de Vuyst, L 2004 Lactic acid bacteria as functional starter cultures for the food fermentation industry. Trends in Food Science and Technology 15 67–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGregor, JU, Traylor, SM, Gough, RH, Hazlett, S & Bird, K 1995 Recovery of lactic acid bacteria on Petrifilm™ SM under various incubation atmospheres. Journal of Food Protection 58 316–318CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Muyanja, CMBK, Narvhus, JA, Treimo, J & Langsrud, T 2003 Isolation, characterization and identification of lactic acid bacteria from Bushera, a Ugandan traditional fermented beverage. International Journal of Food Microbiology 80 201–210CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nero, LA, Beloti, V, Barros, MAF, Ortolani, MBT, Tamanini, R & Franco, BDGM 2006 Comparison of Petrifilm™ Aerobic Count Plates and de Man-Rogosa-Sharpe Agar for enumeration of lactic acid bacteria. Journal of Rapid Methods and Automation in Microbiology 14 249–257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salminen, S, von Wright, A & Ouwehand, AC 2004 Lactic Acid Bacteria: Microbiological and Functional Aspects, 3rd Edn. London: CRC PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tavolaro, P, Ferrati, AR, Destro, MT, Landgraf, M & Franco, BDGM 2005 Performance of two ready-to-use systems for enumeration of aerobic mesophilic microorganisms in frozen goat milk. Brazilian Journal of Microbiology 36 295–300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wehr, HM & Frank, JF 2004 Standard Methods for the Examination of Dairy Products, 17th Edn.Washington: American Public Health AssociationCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zamfir, M, Vancanneyt, M, Markras, L, Vaningelgem, F, Lefebvre, K, Pot, B, Swings, J & de Vuyst, L 2006 Biodiversity of lactic acid bacteria in Romanian dairy products. Systematic and Applied Microbiology 29 487–495CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed