Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-xm8r8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-01T22:34:42.277Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Nutritive properties of freshly prepared and stored evaporated milks manufactured by a normal commercial procedure or by reduced thermal processes in the presence of nisin

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2009

Margaret E. Gregory ,
Kathleen M. Henry  and
S. K. Kon
Margaret E. Gregory
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying, Shinfield, Reading
Kathleen M. Henry
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying, Shinfield, Reading
S. K. Kon
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying, Shinfield, Reading
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

From a batch of raw milk, evaporated milk was prepared commercially by 3 procedures: A, a normal commercial procedure involving holding the filled cans at a maximum temperature of 113 °C for 15 min; B, with nisin added and holding at a maximum temperature of 105 °C for 15 min; C, with nisin added and holding at a maximum temperature of 113 °C for 3 min. The content of B vitamins in the raw and evaporated milks was measured microbiologically; the nutritive value of the proteins was determined in rat tests.

In milk A, 83% of the vitamin B12, 38% of the vitamin B6 and 20% of the thiamine were destroyed during processing. In milk B, the losses were 67, 30 and 19%, respectively, only the loss of vitamin B12 being significantly lower than in milk A. In milk C, the losses were 67, 23 and 14%, respectively, each of them being significantly lower than in milk A. There was no further loss of thiamine on storage of the milks for 12 months at 4 °C, but at room temperature and at 37 °C further losses occurred in all the milks. Similarly, the vitamin B6 activity of the milks decreased on storage, the loss being greatest at 37 °C, but also detectable at 4 °C. No change in the vitamin B12 content occurred on storage, and no losses of biotin, nicotinic acid, pantothenic acid or riboflavin were detected during manufacture or storage of the evaporated milks.

The biological value and true digestibility of the proteins of the evaporated milks were slightly lower than for the raw milk. Neither nisin treatment nor storage at room temperature for a year affected these characteristics.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Journal of Dairy Research , Volume 31 , Issue 1 , February 1964 , pp. 113 - 119
Copyright
Copyright © Proprietors of Journal of Dairy Research 1964

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Ball, C. O. & Olson, F. C. W. (1957). Sterilization in Food Technology. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company Inc.Google Scholar
Banhidi, Z. G. (1958). Acta chem. scand. 12, 517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, L. L., Sniff, E. E. & O'brien, R. T. (1959). Food Tech., Champaign, 13, 462.Google Scholar
Causeret, J., Hugot, D., Goulas-Scholler, C. & Mocquot, G. (1961). Ann. Tech. agric. 10, 289.Google Scholar
Chapman, H. R., Ford, J. E., Kon, S. K., Thompson, S. Y., Rowland, S. J., Crossley, E. L. & Rothwell, J. (1957). J. Dairy Res. 24, 191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, M. K., Gregory, M. E. & Henry, K. M. (1959). J. Dairy Res. 26, 215.Google Scholar
Great Britain, Parliament (1962). The Preservatives in Food Regulations 1962, Stat. Instrum. no.1532.Google Scholar
Gregory, M. E. (1959). J. Dairy Res. 26, 203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gregory, M. E., Ford, J. E. & Kon, S. K. (1958). J. Dairy Res. 25, 447.Google Scholar
Hawley, H. B. (1958). Milchwissenschaft, 13, 253.Google Scholar
Henry, K. M., Houston, J., Kon, S. K. & Thompson, S. Y. (1944). J. Dairy Res. 13, 329.Google Scholar
Henry, K. M. & Kon, S. K. (1938). J. Dairy Res. 9, 6.Google Scholar
Henry, K. M. & Kon, S. K. (1956). Brit. J. Nutr. 10, 39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henry, K. M., Kon, S. K., Lea, C. H. & White, J. C. D. (1947–1948). J. Dairy Res. 15, 292.Google Scholar
Henry, K. M., Kon, S. K. & Watson, M. B. (1937). Milk and Nutrition, Part I, p. 37. Reading: National Institute for Research in Dairying.Google Scholar
Henry, K. M. & Porter, J. W. G. & Porter, J. (1959). 15th Int. Dairy Congr. 1, 425.Google Scholar
Henry, K. M. & Toothill, J. (1962). Brit. J. Nutr. 16, 125.Google Scholar
Hugot, D. & Causeret, J. (1962). Ann. Tech. agric. 11, 55.Google Scholar
Kon, S. K. (1960). Vth Int. Congr. Nutrition, Washington, Panel V, p. 1; Fed. Proc. 20, no. 1, part III, p. 209.Google Scholar
McGillivray, W. A. & Gregory, M. E. (1962). J. Dairy Res. 29, 211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mijll Dekker, L. P. van der & Engel, C. (1952). Ned. melk- en Zuiveltijdschr. 6, 104.Google Scholar
Mitchell, H. H. (1923–1924). J. biol. Chem. 58, 873.Google Scholar
Mitchell, H. H. & Carman, G. G. (1926). J. biol. Chem. 68, 183.Google Scholar
Roberts, E. C. & Snell, E. E. (1946). J. biol. Chem. 163, 499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar