Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-v5vhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-23T10:54:14.917Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The formation of complexes between whey proteins and carboxymethyl cellulose modified with substituents of increased hydrophobicity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2009

J. G. Zadow  and
R. D. Hill
J. G. Zadow
Affiliation:
Division of Food Research, Dairy Research Laboratory, C.S.I.R.O., Highett, Victoria, Australia
R. D. Hill
Affiliation:
Division of Food Research, Dairy Research Laboratory, C.S.I.R.O., Highett, Victoria, Australia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The precipitation of proteins from whey by modified carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC) was examined. Carboxymethyl cellulose containing acetyl, methoxyl or carboxymethyl secondary amides with iso-propyl, n-propyl, iso-butyl, n-butyl or cyclohexyl side chains precipitated more protein than did CMC of similar carboxyl content. This effect was greatest in CMC containing secondary amide groups. The increase in protein precipitation gained by introduction of secondary amide groups into CMC was no greater however than the increase obtained by introduction of a similar number of carboxymethyl groups into the polymer. Carboxyethyl cellulose did not form insoluble complexes with whey proteins under the conditions examined.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Journal of Dairy Research , Volume 45 , Issue 1 , February 1978 , pp. 85 - 92
Copyright
Copyright © Proprietors of Journal of Dairy Research 1978

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

American Society for Testing and Materials (1971). ASTM D-871–63.Google Scholar
American Society for Testing and Materials (1971). ASTM D-1439–65.Google Scholar
Bikales, N. M. & Stephens, J. R. (1962). United States Patent 3 029 232.Google Scholar
Fleck, A. & Munro, H. N. (1965). Clinica chimica Acta 11, 2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hidalgo, J. & Hansen, P. M. T. (1969). Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 17, 1089.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, R. D. & Zadow, J. G. (1974). Journal of Dairy Research 41, 373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klug, E. D. & Tinsley, J. S. (1950). United States Patent 2517577.Google Scholar
Malm, C. J. & Crane, C. L. (1951). United States Patent 2539451.Google Scholar
Rowland, S. J. (1938). Journal of Dairy Research 9, 42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steele, R. & Pacsu, E. (1949). Textile Research Journal 19, 771.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sundaram, P. V. (1974). Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications 61, 717.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tanghe, L. J., Genung, L. B. & Mench, J. W. (1963 a). In Methods in Carbohydrate Chemistry 3, p. 196. (Ed. Whistler, R. L..) New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Tanghe, L. J., Genung, L. B. & Mench, J. W. (1963 b). In Methods in Carbohydrate Chemistry 3, p. 194. (Ed. Whistler, R. L..) New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Vaughan, C. L. P. (1952). United States Patent 2618633.Google Scholar
Vieböck, F. & Brecher, C. (1930). Berichte der Deutschen Chemischen Gesellschaft 63B, 3207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whistler, R. L. & Spencer, W. W. (1961). Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics 95, 36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zadow, J. G. (1975 a). Svensk Papperstidning 78, 376.Google Scholar
Zadow, J. G. (1975 b). Cellulose Chemistry and Technology 9, 353.Google Scholar