Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-mwx4w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-25T05:52:16.589Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Evaluation of low cost in-line milk samplers for estimating individual cow somatic cell counts

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 1997

TIMOTHY CLARKE
Affiliation:
Agriculture Victoria Dairy Research Institute, Ellinbank, Warragul, VIC 3820, Australia
SIMON-PETER ANDREWS
Affiliation:
Agriculture Victoria Dairy Research Institute, Ellinbank, Warragul, VIC 3820, Australia
PETER J. MOATE
Affiliation:
Agriculture Victoria Dairy Research Institute, Ellinbank, Warragul, VIC 3820, Australia
CARMEL A. POLLINO
Affiliation:
Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia
WERNER L. SCHMIDT
Affiliation:
Agriculture Victoria Milking Research Centre, Ellinbank, Warragul, VIC 3820, Australia

Abstract

The Dairy Herd Improvement Fund of Victoria recently identified a requirement for a simple and inexpensive in-line sampler to enable dairy farmers to collect representative milk samples for counting somatic cells. We found that the currently available simple in-line milk samplers, when connected to standard 35 ml collection vessels, terminate sampling early in a milking, and thus provide samples that are unrepresentative of the whole milking. We showed that cell count during a milking varies greatly, tending to be high for the first 1–2 l. Analyses of resulting samples will thus tend to overestimate cell counts if samplers are used in their traditional way. We found greater sampling rates in high-line compared with low-line milking systems, and consequently developed modified samplers suitable for both situations. Our samplers utilize low sampling rates (∼1–3%) and large collection vessels (450 ml). Compared with currently available simple in-line samplers, our type of sampler provided milk samples considerably more representative of the entire milking for the majority of cows. In conjunction with subsampling, they provided samples of appropriate size (12·5 ml minimum to 25 ml maximum) for testing fat, protein, lactose and cell count. Cell count results indicated that errors associated with the use of currently available simple in-line samplers could frequently be >200%. In contrast, we found that use of our samplers gave an estimate for cell count that was only slightly higher (mean 20%) than that from samples collected by an approved Tru-Test sampler.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Proprietors of Journal of Dairy Research 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)