Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-g78kv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-30T23:48:20.893Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The effect of varying ratios of roughage to concentrates on composition and yield of cow's milk*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2009

S. Gordin ,
R. Volcani  and
Yehudith Birk
S. Gordin
Affiliation:
Volcani Institute of Agricultural Research, Bet Dagan, and Faculty of Agriculture, Hebrew University, Rehovot, Israel
R. Volcani
Affiliation:
Volcani Institute of Agricultural Research, Bet Dagan, and Faculty of Agriculture, Hebrew University, Rehovot, Israel
Yehudith Birk
Affiliation:
Volcani Institute of Agricultural Research, Bet Dagan, and Faculty of Agriculture, Hebrew University, Rehovot, Israel
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

TWO levels of roughage, 3 FU (feed units) and 5 FU daily, were fed to Israeli?–Friesian cows and heifers receiving either a normal (Normal) or a high-energy (High) diet.

Milk yield and composition were examined for 12 weeks following parturition. The animals receiving 5 FU of roughage daily showed a higher milk yield during the first 8 weeks. With the Normal diet the amount of roughage had no effect on milk composition. With the High diet, milk yield was higher than with the Normal, and a depression in fat percentage was observed in the milk of cows and heifers receiving 3 FU daily. No corresponding fall in milk protein percentage was observed – the cows of this group (High-3 FU roughage) showing, in fact, a rise in protein percentage. No differences in milk total solids were found. With these high-energy low-roughage diets no correlation was apparent between milk fat and protein percentages.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Journal of Dairy Research , Volume 38 , Issue 3 , October 1971 , pp. 295 - 302
Copyright
Copyright © Proprietors of Journal of Dairy Research 1971

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Breirem, K. (1955). Agric. Dev. Pap. F.A.O. no. 51, p. 67.Google Scholar
Corbin, E. A. & Whittier, E. O. (1965). In Fundamentals of Dairy Chemistry, p. 1. (Eds Webb, B. H. and Johnson, A. H..) Westport, Conn: Avi Publishing Co.Google Scholar
Gardner, R. W. (1969). J. Dairy Sci. 52, 1973.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gordin, S., Volcani, R. & Birk, Y. (1971). J. Dairy Res. 38, 287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoglund, C. R. (1963). J. Dairy Sci. 46, 401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huber, J. T., Graf, G. C. & Engel, R. W. (1964). J. Dairy Sci. 47, 63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoffman, C. F. (1961). J. Dairy Sci. 44, 2113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jenness, R. & Patton, S. (1959). Principles of Dairy Chemistry, p. 22. London: Chapman and Hall Ltd.Google Scholar
Kesler, E. M. & Spahr, S. L. (1964). J. Dairy Sci. 47, 1122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snedecor, G. W. (1956). Statistical Methods Applied to Experiments in Agriculture and Biology, 5th edn.Ames, Iowa: Iowa State College Press.Google Scholar
Van soest, P. J. (1963). J. Dairy Sci. 46, 204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar