Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-gvh9x Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T10:02:10.006Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The effect of the plane of energy nutrition of the cow during the late winter-feeding period on the changes in the solids-not-fat content of milk during the spring-grazing period

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2009

J. A. F. Rook
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying, Shinfield, Reading
C. Line
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying, Shinfield, Reading
S. J. Rowland
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying, Shinfield, Reading

Summary

Three groups of eight Friesian cows, four of high and four of low milk yield, were given during the last month of the winter-feeding period rations that provided respectively low, normal and high planes of energy nutrition, at approximately 75,100 and 130% of the Woodman standards for starch equivalent (S.E.). They were then all changed to the grazing of good, spring pasture, without supplementary food. The changes with grazing in solids-not-fat (S.N.F.) content and yield of milk were markedly influenced by the previous level of winter feeding. After 15–18 days of grazing the mean changes in S.N.F. percentage were +0·33, +0·11 and –0·12 for the low, normal and high energy groups, and the corresponding changes in milk yield were +7·70, +2·13 and –0·68 lb per cow per day. The changes in S.N.F. reflected mainly changes in protein content, and to these casein, β-lacto-globulin and α-lactalbumin all contributed. Small, differential changes were found in the fat and lactose contents of the milk. The effects of the level of initial milk yield of the cow on the various responses to grazing are recorded.

These observations support the view that when a rise in S.N.F. with spring grazing occurs it probably results from an improvement in the plane of energy nutrition. There appears to be no need to postulate a special effect of any specific herbage constituent.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Proprietors of Journal of Dairy Research 1960

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Annison, E. F., Lewis, D. & Lindsay, D. B. (1959). J. agric. Sci. 53, 34.Google Scholar
Aschaffenburg, R. & Drewry, J. (1959). Proc. XVth Int. Dairy Congr. 3, 1631.Google Scholar
Balch, C. C., Balch, D. A., Bartlett, S., Bartrum, M. P., Johnson, V. W., Rowland, S. J. & Turner, J. (1955). J. Dairy Res. 22, 270.Google Scholar
Balch, D. A. & Rowland, S. J. (1957). Brit. J. Nutr. 11, 288.Google Scholar
Bartlett, S., Folley, S. J., Rowland, S. J., Curnow, D. H. & Simpson, S. A. (1948). Nature, Lond., 162, 845.Google Scholar
British Standards Institution (1951). B.S. 1741, p. 7.Google Scholar
British Standards Institution (1955). B.S. 696, Part 2, p. 7.Google Scholar
Burt, A. W. A. (1957). Dairy Sci. Abstr. 19, 436.Google Scholar
Hinton, C. L. & Macara, T. (1927). Analyst, 52, 668.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pope, G. S., McNaughton, M. J. & Jones, H. E. H. (1959). J. Dairy Res. 26, 196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Provan, A. L. (1956). Variations in the Composition of Milk from Individual Animals and Herds. Report of Milk Marketing Board of England and Wales.Google Scholar
Riddet, W., Campbell, I. L., McDowall, F. H. & Cox, G. A. (1941). N.Z. J. Sci. Tech. 23, 80A and 99 A.Google Scholar
Rook, J. A. F. & Balch, C. C. (1959). Proc. Nutr. Soc. 18, xxxiv.Google Scholar
Rook, J. A. F. & Rowland, S. J. (1959). Proc. XVth Int. Dairy Congr. 1, 204.Google Scholar
Rowland, S. J. (1944). J. Dairy Res. 13, 261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rowland, S. J. (1946). Dairy Ind. 11, 656.Google Scholar
Waite, R., Castle, M. E. & Watson, J. N. (1959). J. Dairy Res. 26, 173.Google Scholar
Waite, R., White, J. C. D. & Robertson, A. (1956). J. Dairy Res. 23, 65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodman, H. E. (1954). Bull. Minist. Agric., Lond., no. 48, 13th ed.Google Scholar