Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-wq2xx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-18T06:07:34.650Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of selected amides on heat-induced changes in milk

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2009

Patrick F. Fox ,
Bridget M. Nash ,
Timothy J. Horan ,
Jeremiah O'brien  and
Patrick A. Morrissey
Patrick F. Fox
Affiliation:
Department of Food Chemistry, University College, Cork, Irish Republic,
Bridget M. Nash
Affiliation:
Department of Food Chemistry, University College, Cork, Irish Republic,
Timothy J. Horan
Affiliation:
Department of Food Chemistry, University College, Cork, Irish Republic,
Jeremiah O'brien
Affiliation:
Department of Food Chemistry, University College, Cork, Irish Republic,
Patrick A. Morrissey
Affiliation:
Department of Food Chemistry, University College, Cork, Irish Republic,
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The effect of 15 amides and related compounds on the heat stability of milk was investigated; of these urea, biuret, triuret, methyl urea and ethyl urea had a similar stabilizing effect. These 5 compounds reacted with lysine to form a ninhydrin-positive compound, possibly homocitrulline, and with lactose produced Maillard-type browning, but some of the other compounds studied were also capable of participating in one or both of these reactions. The only effect which the 5 stabilizing amides had in common and which the other compounds did not share was a significant pH-buffering capacity in synthetic systems and in milk. It is suggested that urea exercises its stabilizing influence in milk principally through its ability to buffer the pH of the system during heating.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Journal of Dairy Research , Volume 47 , Issue 2 , June 1980 , pp. 211 - 219
Copyright
Copyright © Proprietors of Journal of Dairy Research 1980

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Andrews, A. T. (1975). Journal of Dairy Research 42, 89–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, D. T. & White, J. C. D. (1966). Journal of Dairy Research 33, 67–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, R. D. (1970). Journal of Dairy Research 37, 187–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, R. D. & Craker, B. A. (1968). Journal of Dairy Research 35, 13–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holt, C., Muir, D. D. & Sweetsur, A. W. M. (1978 a). Journal of Dairy Research 45, 47–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holt, C., Muir, D. D. & Sweetsur, A. W. M. (1978 a). Journal of Dairy Research 45, 183–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, Y. K., Yaguchi, M. & Rose, D. (1969). Journal of Dairy Science 52, 316–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manson, W. (1962). Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 63, 515–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGann, T. C. A. & Pyne, G. T. (1960). Journal of Dairy Research 27, 403–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muir, D. D., Abbot, J. & Sweetsur, A. W. M. (1978). Journal of Food Technology 13, 45–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muir, D. D. & Sweetsur, A. W. M. (1976). Journal of Dairy Research 43, 495–499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muir, D. D. & Sweetsur, A. W. M. (1977). Journal of Dairy Research 44, 249–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muir, D. D. & Sweetsur, A. W. M. (1978). Journal of Dairy Research 45, 37–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pyne, G. T. (1958). Journal of Dairy Research 25, 467–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robertson, N. H. & Dixon, A. (1969). Agroanimalia 1, 141–144.Google Scholar
Stark, G. R., Stein, W. H. & Moore, S. (1960). Journal of Biological Chemistry 235, 3177–3181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar