Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-tn8tq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-28T17:01:00.313Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of proteose-peptone on the heat gelation of whey protein isolates

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2009

Robyn M. Hillier  and
Gordon C. Cheeseman
Robyn M. Hillier
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying, Shinfield, Reading, RG2 9AT
Gordon C. Cheeseman
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying, Shinfield, Reading, RG2 9AT
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Whey proteins have been isolated from cheese whey by complex formation with carboxymethylcellulose. The protein preparations form stable gels and foams when reconstituted in water. A study has been made of the effect of concentration, pH and temperature on the gelling behaviour of the whey protein isolates, and the conditions necessary for a standard gelling test have been defined. Proteose-peptones (p-p) have been prepared from a whey protein isolate which showed a strong tendency to gel, and also from heated and unheated milk. The gelling behaviour of whey protein isolates, which showed either no tendency or a strong tendency to gel, has been studied in the presence and absence of added p-p. The quantities added varied from 0·05 mg isolated from unheated milk to 15 mg from heated milk. No change in gelling time was observed, and it was concluded that p-p were not responsible for the gelling behaviour exhibited by whey protein isolates.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Journal of Dairy Research , Volume 46 , Issue 1 , January 1979 , pp. 113 - 120
Copyright
Copyright © Proprietors of Journal of Dairy Research 1979

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Ansbacher, S., Flanigan, G. E. & Supplee, G. C. (1934). Journal of Dairy Science 17, 723.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aschaffenburg, R. (1946). Journal of Dairy Research 14, 316.Google Scholar
Aschaffenburg, R. & Drewry, J. (1957). Biochemical Journal 65, 273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brunner, J. R. & Thompson, M. P. (1961). Journal of Dairy Science 44, 1224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooney, C. M. (1974). Thesis, University of Minnesota, USA.Google Scholar
Ellman, G. L. (1959). Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics 82, 70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
El-Rafey, M. S. & Richardson, G. A. (1944a). Journal of Dairy Science 27, 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
El-Rafey, M. S. & Richardson, G. A. (1944b). Journal of Dairy Science 27, 19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hillier, R. M. (1976). Journal of Dairy Research 43, 259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jenness, R. (1959). Journal of Dairy Science 42, 895.Google Scholar
Ng, W. C, Brunner, J. R. & Rhee, K. C. (1970). Journal of Dairy Science 53, 987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ouchterlony, Ö. (1948). Acta Pathologica et Microbiologica Scandinavica 25, 186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palmer, D. E. (1977). Process Biochemistry 12 (5), 24.Google Scholar
Volpe, T. & Zabik, M. E. (1975). Cereal Chemistry 52, 188.Google Scholar
Wyeth, T. C. (1972). Journal of the Society of Dairy Technology 25, 136.Google Scholar