Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-cjp7w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-18T20:43:07.242Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The effect of incomplete milking or of an extended milking interval on the yield and composition of cow's milk

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2009

J. V. Wheelock
Affiliation:
The National Institute for Research in Dairying, Shinfield, Reading
J. A. F. Rook
Affiliation:
The National Institute for Research in Dairying, Shinfield, Reading
F. H. Dodd
Affiliation:
The National Institute for Research in Dairying, Shinfield, Reading

Summary

The effect of incomplete milking or of an extended milking interval on the yield and composition of cow's milk has been investigated. At the 1st milking after either treatment, the yield of milk was augmented by a carry-over of milk but at the 2nd milking the yield was invariably depressed and then increased until the original yield, or slightly less, was recovered within 5 days. The concentration of lactose and potassium decreased and of sodium, chloride, whey proteins and casein increased during the period of the treatment, and on the resumption of normal milking the original composition was rapidly recovered. The changes in the composition of fat were less clearly defined because of residual milk effects but over the period of the treatment and the succeeding 6 milkings the effect was invariably to increase fat percentage. The differing effects on composition resulted in a more marked effect on the yields of lactose, potassium and casein than on those of sodium, chloride or the whey proteins throughout the treatment and recovery periods. When milk was removed in portions after an extended milking interval there were decreases in the concentrations of lactose and potassium and increases in those of sodium and chloride throughout normal milking. When the residual milk was obtained after an injection of oxytocin the composition of the portions of milk resembled that of the first portions of milk removed from the udder. The possible effects of the treatments on the secretory cells and the permeability of the udder tissue are discussed.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Proprietors of Journal of Dairy Research 1965

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Aschaffenburg, R. & Drewry, J. (1959). 15th Int. Dairy Congr. 3, 1631.Google Scholar
Barry, J. M. & Rowland, S. J. (1953). Biochem. J. 54, 575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bailey, G. L., Clough, P. A. & Dodd, F. H. (1955). J. Dairy Res. 22, 22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bailey, G. L., Clough, P. A., Dodd, F. H., Foot, A. S. & Rowland, S. J. (1953). 13th Int. Dairy Congr. 2, 76.Google Scholar
Dodd, F. H. & Clough, P. A. (1962). 16th Int. Dairy Congr. 1, 89.Google Scholar
Elliott, G. M., Dodd, F. H. & Brumby, P. J. (1960). J. Dairy Res. 27, 293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garrison, E. R. & Turner, C. W. (1936). Res. Bull. Mo. agric. Exp. Stn, no. 234.Google Scholar
Hansson, A., Dassat, P. & Claesson, O. (1954). Riv. Zootec. 27, 316.Google Scholar
Johansson, I. (1949). 12th Int. Dairy Congr. 1, 171.Google Scholar
Johansson, I. & Claesson, O. (1957). In Progress in the Physiology of Farm Animals 3, 1005 (ed. Hammond, J.). London: Butterworths Scientific Publications.Google Scholar
Schmidt, G. H., Guthrie, R. S. & Guest, R. W. (1964). J. Dairy Sci. 47, 152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wheelock, J. V., Rook, J. A. F. & Dodd, F. H. (1965). J. Dairy Res. 32, 79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar