Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-mwx4w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-30T10:12:58.162Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The effect of heat on the vitamin B6 of milk: II. A comparison of biological and microbiological tests of evaporated milk

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2009

Mary K. Davies
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying, Shinfield, Reading
Margaret E. Gregory
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying, Shinfield, Reading
Kathleen M. Henry
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying, Shinfield, Reading

Extract

1. For chicks and rats pyridoxine, pyridoxal and pyridoxamine were equally active in terms of the free bases when given separately from the diet.

2. Under our experimental conditions pyridoxine mixed with the chick diet was stable, but 20% of pyridoxamine, and a variable amount of pyridoxal was lost.

3. The vitamin B6 activities measured with Saccharomyces carlsbergensis, chicks and rats respectively and expressed as μg. pyridoxine/g. freeze-dried milk were: raw milk 3·4, 3·2 and 4·9; evaporated milk 1·0, 2·1 and 2·7; stored evaporated milk 0·6, 1·4 and 2·0. For the chicks the milks were mixed with the diets; they were given separately to the rats.

4. The microbiological and biological results for raw milk agreed within the limits of experimental error. For the processed milks the differences between biological and microbiological tests were statistically significant.

5. All three methods of assay showed a 45–70% loss of vitamin B6 activity on processing and a further loss of 30% of the remainder after storage for 6 months at room temperature.

We are indebted to Mr J. Rothwell, Department of Dairying, University of Reading, for preparing the evaporated milk and to Dr B. Record, Ministry of Supply, Microbiological Research Establishment, Porton, for freeze-drying the milk. We should like to thank Dr S. K. Kon for his interest in this work.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Proprietors of Journal of Dairy Research 1959

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

(1)Bessey, O. A., Adam, D. J. D., Bussey, D. R. & Hansen, A. E. (1954). Fed. Proc. 13, 451.Google Scholar
(2)Molony, C. J. & Parmelee, A. H. (1954). J. Amer. med. Ass. 154, 405.Google Scholar
(3)Coursin, D. B. (1954). J. Amer. med. Ass. 154, 406.Google Scholar
(4)Hansen, A. E., Wiese, H. F., Adam, D. J. D., Bussey, D. R. & Worsham, A. G. (1954). Fed. Proc. 13, 460.Google Scholar
(5)Tomarelli, R. M., Spence, E. R. & Bernhart, F. W. (1955). Agric. & Fd Chem. 3, 338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(6)Hassinen, J. B., Durbin, G. T. & Bernhart, F. W. (1954). J. Nutr. 53, 249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(7)Gregory, M. E. (1959). J. Dairy Res. 26, 203.Google Scholar
(8)Chapman, H. R., Ford, J. E., Kon, S. K., Thompson, S. Y. & Rowland, S. J. (1957). J. Dairy Res. 24, 191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(9)Coates, M. E., Kon, S. K. & Shepheard, E. E. (1950). Brit. J. Nutr. 4, 203.Google Scholar
(10)Rabinowitz, J. C. & Snell, E. E. (1948). J. biol. Chem. 176, 1157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(11)de Louriero, A. (1931). Arch. Pat., Lisboa, 3, 72.Google Scholar
(12)Cuthbertson, W. F. J. & Thornton, D. M. (1952). Brit. J. Nutr. 6, 170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(13)British Standards Institution (1940). B.S. 911.Google Scholar
(14)Snell, E. E. & Rannefeld, A. N. (1945). J. biol. Chem. 157, 475.Google Scholar
(15)Sarma, P. S., Snell, E. E. & Elvehjem, C. A. (1946). J. biol. Chem. 165, 55.Google Scholar
(16)Snell, E. E. & Rabinowitz, J. C. (1948). J. Amer. chem. Soc. 70, 3432.Google Scholar
(17)Waibel, P. E., Cravens, W. W. & Snell, E. E. (1952). J. Nutr. 48, 531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(18)Luckey, T. D., Briggs, G. M., Elvehjem, C. A. & Hart, E. B. (1945). Proc. Soc. exp. Biol., N.Y., 58, 340.Google Scholar