Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-ndmmz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-08T08:29:54.588Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Autolysis of Streptococcus cremoris

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2009

Lynette Mou
Affiliation:
Russell Grimwade School of Biochemistry, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria 3052, Australia
J. J. Sullivan
Affiliation:
Dairy Research Laboratory, Division of Food Research, C.S.I.R.O., Highett, Victoria 3190, Australia
G. R. Jago
Affiliation:
Dairy Research Laboratory, Division of Food Research, C.S.I.R.O., Highett, Victoria 3190, Australia

Summary

The autolysin of Streptococcus cremoris had the specificity of an endo-N-acetylmuramidase as it hydrolysed the linkage between N-acetylmuramic acid and N-acetylglucosamine. The enzyme had no amidase or endopeptidase action. It reached highest activity in the exponential phase of growth and in the electron microscope seemed to fragment the coccal wall at the equatorial ring.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Proprietors of Journal of Dairy Research 1976

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bleiweis, A. S. & Krause, R. M. (1965). Journal of Experimental Medicine 122, 237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, W. C., Fraser, D. K. & Young, F. E. (1970). Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 198, 308.Google Scholar
Conover, M. J., Thompson, J. S. & Shockman, G. D. (1966). Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications 23, 713.Google Scholar
Coyette, J. & Ghuysen, J-M. (1970). Biochemistry 9, 2952.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coyette, J. & Shockman, G. D. (1973). Journal of Bacteriology 114, 34.Google Scholar
French, C. S. & Milner, H. W. (1955). Methods in Enzymology 1, 64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ghuysen, J-M., Tipper, D. J. & Strominger, J. L. (1966). Methods in Enzymology 8, 685.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huff, E. & Silverman, C. S. (1968). Journal of Bacteriology 95, 99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krulwich, T. A. & Ensign, J. C. (1968). Journal of Bacteriology 96, 857.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDonald, I. J. (1971). Canadian Journal of Microbiology 17, 897.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matheson, A. T. & Tattrie, B. L. (1964). Canadian Journal of Biochemistry 42, 95.Google Scholar
Mitchell, P. D. & Moyle, J. (1957). Journal of General Microbiology 16, 184.Google Scholar
Montague, M. D. (1963). Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 78, 373.Google Scholar
Moustafa, H. H. & Collins, E. B. (1968 a). Journal of Bacteriology 95, 592.Google Scholar
Moustafa, H. H. & Collins, E. B. (1968 b). Journal of Bacteriology 96, 117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ohmiya, K. & Sato, Y. (1969). Agricultural and Biological Chemistry 33, 1628.Google Scholar
Ohmiya, K. & Sato, Y. (1970). Agricultural and Biological Chemistry 34, 457.Google Scholar
Pooley, H. M., Porres-Juan, J. M. & Shockman, G. D. (1970). Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications 38, 1134.Google Scholar
Schleifer, K. H. & Kandler, O. (1972). Bacteriological Reviews 36, 407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharon, N. (1969). Scientific American 220 (5), 92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shockman, G. D. (1965). Bacteriological Reviews 29, 345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shockman, G. D. & Cheney, M. C. (1969). Journal of Bacteriology 98, 1199.Google Scholar
Shockman, G. D. & Martin, J. T. (1968). Journal of Bacteriology 96, 1803.Google Scholar
Shockman, G. D., Pooley, H. M. & Thompson, J. S. (1967). Journal of Bacteriology 94, 1525.Google Scholar
Shockman, G. D., Thompson, J. S. & Conover, M. J. (1967). Biochemistry 6, 1054.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, J. S. & Shockman, G. D. (1968). Analytical Biochemistry 22, 260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tipper, D. J. (1969). Journal of Bacteriology 97, 837.Google Scholar
Vanderheiden, G. J., Fairchild, A. C. & Jago, G. R. (1970). Applied Microbiology 19, 875.Google Scholar
Young, F. E. (1966). Journal of Biological Chemistry 241, 3462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar