Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-846f6c7c4f-xq4m6 Total loading time: 0.266 Render date: 2022-07-07T15:20:25.203Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "useNewApi": true } hasContentIssue true

Perception of animal welfare and its certification system by Brazilian consumers and dairy farmers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 February 2022

Vinicius Cardoso Comin
Affiliation:
Centro Universitário Central Paulista (UNICEP), São Carlos13568-250, Brazil
Helena Fagundes Karsburg
Affiliation:
Integral Comunicação, Belo Horizonte, Brazil
Bruna Maria Salotti de Souza
Affiliation:
Departamento de Tecnologia e Inspeção de Produtos de Origem Animal, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG), Belo Horizonte, Brazil
Henrique Meiroz de Souza Almeida
Affiliation:
Univ. Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Faculdade de Ciências Agrárias e Veterinárias, Jaboticabal, Brazil
Ligia Maria Neira
Affiliation:
Centro Universitário Central Paulista (UNICEP), São Carlos13568-250, Brazil
Gabriel Augusto Marques Rossi*
Affiliation:
University Vila Velha, Espírito Santo, Brazil
*
Author for correspondence: Gabriel Rossi, Email: gabriel.rossi@uvv.br

Abstract

The practices adopted in dairy farms can positively or negatively affect the perception of consumers. To meet consumer expectations and improve the productivity of dairy farms, a welfare certification system has recently been initiated in Brazil. In this research communication we describe the perceptions of Brazilian consumers and farmers regarding the implementation of welfare certification systems and the most common practices that affect animal welfare on dairy farms. For this purpose, two semi-structured questionnaires were used: one applied to 409 consumers and the other to 158 dairy farmers. The results demonstrate that consumers are concerned with the adoption of welfare practices in animal husbandry at dairy farms, mainly on topics related to movement restriction and cow-calf separation. Thus, the majority of consumers state that they are willing to pay more for welfare-certified dairy products. In addition, most dairy farmers are interested in adopting a welfare certification system, especially if it could add value to the raw milk sold to industries. Veterinarians and animal scientists are important for disseminating animal welfare recommendations, and the consequences of its improper adoption need to be emphasized. Finally, dairy farms need improvements regarding environmental hygiene, thermal conditions, animal husbandry, health, and milking processes. In conclusion, consumers and farmers are interested in welfare systems and their certification, and there is a need for stakeholders to make welfare certification a reality in the Brazilian dairy supply chain.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Hannah Dairy Research Foundation

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agenäs, S (2020) Introduction: special issue themed section on milk production with cow and calf together. Journal of Dairy Research 87, Special Issue S1: DairyCare: Husbandry for wellbeing, 99100.10.1017/S0022029920000643CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Busch, G, Weary, DM, Spiller, A and von Keyserlingk, MAG (2017) American and German attitudes towards cow-calf separation on dairy farms. PLoS ONE 12, e0174013.10.1371/journal.pone.0174013CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cardoso, CS, von Keyserlingk, MAG and Hotzel, MJ (2017) Brazilian Citizens: expectations regarding dairy cattle welfare and awareness of contentious practices. Animals 7, 89.10.3390/ani7120089CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Croyle, SL, Belage, E, Khosa, DK, LeBlanc, SJ, Haley, DB and Kelton, DF (2019) Dairy farmer's expectation and receptivity regarding animal welfare advice: a focus group study. Journal of Dairy Science 102, 73857397.10.3168/jds.2018-15821CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, A, Schexnayder, S, Schneider, L, Oliver, S, Pinghetti, G, Petersson-Wolfe, C, Bewley, J, Ward, S and Krawczel, P (2020) Dairy producers in southeast United States are concerned with cow care and welfare. Journal of Dairy Research 87, 6063.10.1017/S0022029919000943CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leliveld, LMC and Provolo, G (2020) A review of welfare indicators of indoor-housed dairy cow as a basis for integrated automatic welfare assessment systems. Animals 10, 1430.10.3390/ani10081430CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lundmark Hedman, F, Andersson, M, Kinch, V, Lindholm, A, Nordqvist, A and Westin, R (2021) Cattle cleanliness from the view of Swedish farmers and official animal welfare inspectors. Animals 11, 945.10.3390/ani11040945CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Queiroz, RG, Domingues, CHF, Canozzi, MEA, Garcia, RG, Ruviaro, CF, Barcellos, JOJ and Borges, JAR (2018) How do Brazilian citizens perceive animal welfare conditions in poultry, beef, and dairy supply chains? PLoS ONE 13, e0202062.10.1371/journal.pone.0202062CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sadiq, MB, Song-Lin, S, Ramanoon, SZ, Syed-Hussain, SS, Mossadeq, WMS, Salisi, MS and Manson, R (2021) Understanding the awareness, knowledge, and opinion of dairy cattle welfare among dairy farmers in Kningau, Sabah. Animals 11, 1750.10.3390/ani11061750CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Spain, CV, Freund, D, Mohan-Gibbons, HM, Meadow, RG and Beacham, L (2018) Are they buying it? United States consumer's changing attitudes toward more humanely raised meat, eggs, and dairy. Animals 8, 128.10.3390/ani8080128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ventura, BA, von Keyserlingk, MAG, Wittman, H and Weary, DM (2016) What difference does a visit make? Changes in animal welfare perceptions after interested citizens tour a dairy farm. PLoS ONE 11, e0154733.10.1371/journal.pone.0154733CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: PDF

Comin et al. supplementary material

Comin et al. supplementary material

Download Comin et al. supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 153 KB

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Perception of animal welfare and its certification system by Brazilian consumers and dairy farmers
Available formats
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Perception of animal welfare and its certification system by Brazilian consumers and dairy farmers
Available formats
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Perception of animal welfare and its certification system by Brazilian consumers and dairy farmers
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *