Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-thh2z Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-08T00:49:39.142Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Fermentation of goat's milk by two DL-type mixed strain starters

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2009

Gunnar Rysstad
Affiliation:
Dairy Research Department, Agricultural University of Norway, 1432 Ås-NLH, Norway
Roger K. Abrahamsen
Affiliation:
Dairy Research Department, Agricultural University of Norway, 1432 Ås-NLH, Norway

Summary

Variations in the biochemical performance of 2 DL-type mixed strain starters CH 01 and FDn grown in a sample of skimmed goat's milk I (obtained 2–3 weeks after parturition) and of goat's milk II (8 months after parturition) were studied, and results compared with those of the cultures grown in skimmed cow's milk. The initial levels of citrate differed in the 3 milks, with goat's milk II containing 0·7 mg/ml, goat's milk I 1·4 mg/ml and cow's milk 1·8 mg/ml. The production of diacetyl, α-acetolactic acid and acetoin was very low in goat's milk II. In goat's milk I the production of these compounds was higher, but still considerably lower than in cow's milk. Production of ethanol (EtOH) was similar in the 3 milks incubated with starter CH 01, but with FDn the production of EtOH was distinctly higher in goat's milk II. The total amount of CO2 produced corresponded with the initial level of citrate; consequently the highest production was found in cow's milk and the lowest in goat's milk II. The use of different starters for fermented products made from goat's milk in early and late lactation is suggested.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Proprietors of Journal of Dairy Research 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Abrahamsen, R. K., Svensen, A. & Tufto, G. N. 1978 Some bacteriological and biochemical activities during the incubation of yoghurt from goat's and cow's milk. 20th International Dairy Congress, Paris E 828829Google Scholar
Cogan, T. M. 1975 Citrate utilization in milk by Leuconostoc cremoris and Streptococcus diacetilactis. Journal of Dairy Research 42 139146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dutta, S. M., Kuila, R. K., Ranganathan, B. & Laxminarayana, H. 1971 A comparative study of the activity of starter cultures in different types of milk. Milchwissenschajt 26 158161Google Scholar
International Dairy Federation 1980 Starters in the manufacture of cheese. Bulletin, International Dairy Federation (Document 129)Google Scholar
JÖnsson, H. & Pettersson, H. E. 1977 Studies on the citric acid fermentation in lactic starter cultures with special interest in α-aceto-lactic acid. I. Analytical procedures. 11. Metabolic studies. Milchwissenschaft 32 513–516; 587594Google Scholar
Konar, A., Thomas, P. C. & Rook, J. A. F. 1971 The concentrations of some water-soluble constituents in the milks of cows, sows, ewes and goats. Journal of Dairy Research 38 333341Google Scholar
Lees, G. J. & Jago, G. R. 1976 Acetaldehyde: an intermediate in the formation of ethanol from glucose by lactic acid bacteria. Journal of Dairy Research 43 6373Google Scholar
Marier, J. R. & Boulet, M. 1958 Determination of citric acid in milk. Journal of Dairy Science 41 16831692Google Scholar
Peaker, M., Faulkner, A. & Blatchford, D. R. 1981 Changes in milk citrate concentration during lactation in the goat. Journal of Dairy Research 48 357361Google Scholar
Singh, J. & Ranganathan, B. 1978 A comparison of the activity of Lactobacillus bulgaricus and one of its mutants in different types of milk. Journal of Dairy Research 45 123125Google Scholar
Svensen, A. 1970 Qualitative and quantitative analyses of volatile aromatic compounds in starters. 18th International Dairy Congress, Sydney E 83Google Scholar