Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c4f8m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T05:09:38.674Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of teat washing on the bacteriological contamination of milk from cows kept under various housing conditions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2009

Charles H. McKinnon ,
Rosemary J. Fulford  and
Christina M. Cousins
Charles H. McKinnon
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying, Shinfield, Reading RG2 9 AT, UK
Rosemary J. Fulford
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying, Shinfield, Reading RG2 9 AT, UK
Christina M. Cousins
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying, Shinfield, Reading RG2 9 AT, UK
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The effect of different methods of teat washing on bacterial contamination and sediment levels of the milk of cows kept under 3 housing conditions was studied. By use of an in line milk sampler and steam sterilized clusters the bacterial contamination from the teats after udder preparation was determined directly.

The results show that, even under the same housing conditions and teat washing treatments, considerable variation in bacterial counts and sediment level occurred. Overall, washing with hypochlorite (600 mg/1 available Cl) and drying with a paper towel gave total counts that were significantly lower than were obtained with the other 4 treatments. The aerobic spore count, in which thermoduric flora predominated, was greatly reduced by drying the teats, but the inclusion of hypochlorite in the wash water had little effect. Coliform contamination was very low (∼ 1/ml) even where the cows' teats were heavily soiled and were not washed.

The sediment levels in the milk again showed wide variation and occasional high values (3 mg/l) were recorded for washed cows. In marked contrast to its effect on the bacteriological results, drying had little effect on reducing the sediment.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Journal of Dairy Research , Volume 50 , Issue 2 , May 1983 , pp. 153 - 162
Copyright
Copyright © Proprietors of Journal of Dairy Research 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

British Standards Institution 1973 Method for the rapid determination of sediment in milk by filtration. B.S. 4938Google Scholar
Clough, P. A., Akam, D. N. & Cant, D. 1965 Circulation cleaning of pipeline milking machines with boiling water. Esso Farmer 17 (1) 4–9Google Scholar
Cousins, C. M. 1972 Sources of bacteria in farm bulk tank milk. Journal of the Society of Dairy Technology 25 200–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dawkins, J. & Slade, J. 1974 An in-line udder wash chlorinator. 19th International Dairy Congress, New Delhi 1E 4–5Google Scholar
Johns, C. K. 1962 The coliform count of raw milk as an index of udder cleanliness. 16th International Dairy Congress, Copenhagen C 365–371Google Scholar
McKinnon, C. H., Cousins, C. M. & Fulford, R. J. 1973 a An in-line milk sampler for determining the numbers of bacteria derived from teat surfaces and udder infections of cows milked in recorder machines. Journal of Dairy Research 40 47–52CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McKinnon, C. H., Riches, M. E., Underwood, H. M., Cousins, C. M. & Davies, F. L. 1973 b Report, National Instihitefor Research in Dairying 1971–72 114Google Scholar
Underwood, H. M., McKinnon, C. H., Davies, F. L. & Cousins, C. M. 1974 Sources of bacillus spores in raw milk. 19th International Dairy Congress, New Delhi 1E 373–374Google Scholar