Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-dwq4g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-25T09:08:25.706Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The effect of diet on the γ- and δ-lactone and methyl ketone potentials of bovine butterfat

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2009

Gerda Urbach
Affiliation:
Dairy Research Laboratory, Division of Food Research, CSIRO, Highett, Victoria 3190, Australia
William Stark
Affiliation:
Dairy Research Laboratory, Division of Food Research, CSIRO, Highett, Victoria 3190, Australia

Summary

The quantity of γ- and δ-lactones and of methyl ketones produced when bovine butterfat was heated in the presence of water vapour and the absence of air, and hence the flavour quality of the butterfat, varied widely with the diet of the lactating cows. There was a marked increase in the γ-dodecanolactone potential when the cows were transferred from pasture to a mixture of chopped lucerne hay plus crushed oats but not when they were transferred to lucerne hay only. Feeding crushed sunflower seeds, whose oil was protected against biohydrogenation in the rumen, but not feeding sunflower meal from which the oil had been extracted, raised the γ-dodec-cis-6-enolactone potential, lowered the saturated δ-lactone potential and the methyl ketone potential and simultaneously raised the proportion of linoleic acid in the butterfat at the expense of fatty acids up to and including C16.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Proprietors of Journal of Dairy Research 1978

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Dimick, P. S. & Harner, J. L. (1968). Journal of Dairy Science 51, 22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dimick, P. S., McCarthy, R. D. & Patton, S. (1970) In Physiology of Digestion and Metabolism in the Ruminant, 3rd International Symposium, 1969, p. 529. (Ed. Phillipson, A. T..) Newcastle upon Tyne: Oriel Press.Google Scholar
Dimick, P. S. & Walker, H. M. (1968). Journal of Dairy Science 51, 478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Earle, D. F., Pankhurst, I. M., Mathews, G. L., Fowler, P. & Robinson, I. B. (1976). Australian Journal of Dairy Technology 31, 48.Google Scholar
Kinsella, J. E. (1969). Chemistry & Industry 36.Google Scholar
Park, R. J., Murray, K. E. & Stanley, G. (1974). Chemistry & Industry 380.Google Scholar
Patton, S. (1965). American Association for the Advancement of Science Food Quality Publication no. 77, 165.Google Scholar
Scott, T. W., Bready, P. J., Royal, A. J. & Cook, L. J. (1972). Search 3, 170.Google Scholar
Stark, W. & Urbach, G. (1974). Chemistry & Industry 413.Google Scholar
Stark, W. & Urbach, G. (1976). Australian Journal of Dairy Technology 31, 80.Google Scholar
Stark, W., Urbach, G., Cook, L. J. & Ashes, J. R. (1978). Journal of Dairy Research 45, 209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Storry, J. E. (1970). Journal of Dairy Research 37, 139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tracey, M. V. (1975). Cereal Foods World 20, 77.Google Scholar
Urbach, G., Stark, W. & Forss, D. A. (1972). Journal of Dairy Research 39, 35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, N. J., Patton, S. & Dimick, P. S. (1968). Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 152, 445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar