Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-2l2gl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-25T12:37:52.706Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Bacteriological sampling of glass, rubber and stainless steel pipe sections

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2009

John G. S. Speers ,
Stephanie J. Lewis  and
Arthur Gilmour
John G. S. Speers
Affiliation:
The Queen's University of Belfast, Agriculture and Food Science Centre, Newforge Lane, Belfast BT9 5PX, Northern Ireland,
Stephanie J. Lewis
Affiliation:
The Queen's University of Belfast, Agriculture and Food Science Centre, Newforge Lane, Belfast BT9 5PX, Northern Ireland,
Arthur Gilmour
Affiliation:
Department of Agriculture for Northern Ireland, The Queen's University of Belfast, Agriculture and Food Science Centre, Newforge Lane, Belfast BT9 5PX, Northern Ireland,
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

A practical effective method was devised for the removal of bacteria from soiled glass, rubber and stainless steel pipe sections which allowed the isolation of bacteria more loosely associated with the surfaces. This method, consisting of a pre-rinse followed by six successive double squeegee rinses, was compared with six other procedures (involving scraping followed by one or more successive swabbings) for the removal of bacteria from rubber pipe sections which had been inserted into an experimental milking plant. The squeegee method was found to be the most effective. It was also found that one particular part of these pipe sections was consistently more heavily contaminated.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Journal of Dairy Research , Volume 51 , Issue 4 , November 1984 , pp. 547 - 555
Copyright
Copyright © Proprietors of Journal of Dairy Research 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Anon. 1981 Milk regulations (Northern Ireland) 1981. Belfast H.M.S.O. (Statutory Rules & Orders no. 234)Google Scholar
Baldock, J. D. 1974 Microbiological monitoring of the food plant: methods to assess bacterial contamination of surfaces. Journal of Milk, and Food Technology 37 361–368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
British Standards Institution 1968 Methods of microbiological examination for dairy purposes. London: B.S.I. (B.S. 4285)Google Scholar
Clark, D. S. 1965 Method of estimating the bacterial population on surfaces. Canadian Journal of Microbiology 11 407–413CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cousins, C. M. 1963 Methods for the detection of survivors on milk handling equipment with reference to the use of disinfectant inhibitors. Journal of Applied Bacteriology 26 376–386CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cousins, C. M. 1972 Sources of bacteria in farm bulk tank milk. Journal of the Society of Dairy Technology 25 200–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cousins, C. M. 1976 The inactivation of vegetative micro-organisms by chemicals in the dairying industry. In Inhibition and Inactivation of Vegetative Microbes pp. 13–30. (Eds Skinner, F. A. and Hugo, W. B.). London: Academic Press (Society for Applied Bacteriology Symposium Series No. 5)Google Scholar
Cousins, C. M. & Bramley, A. J. 1981 The microbiology of raw milk. In Dairy Microbiology Vol. 1, pp. 119–163. (Ed. Robinson, R. K.). London: Applied Science PublishersGoogle Scholar
Cousins, C. M., Hoy, W. A. & Clegg, L. F. L. 1960 The evaluation of surface active disinfectants for use in milk production. Journal of Applied Bacteriology 23 359–371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Druce, R. G. & Thomas, S. B. 1972 Bacteriological studies on bulk milk collection: pipeline milking plants and bulk milk tanks as sources of bacterial contamination of milk: a review. Journal of Applied Bacteriology 35 253–270CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dunsmore, D. G., Twomey, A., Whittlestone, W. G. & Morgan, H. W. 1981 Design and performance of systems for cleaning product-contact surfaces of food equipment: a review. Journal of Food Protection 44 220–240CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Favero, M. S., Mcdade, J. J., Robertson, J. A., Hoffman, R. K. & Edwards, R. W. 1968 Microbiological sampling of surfaces. Journal of Applied Bacteriology 31 336–343CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lisboa, N. P. 1959 A tube test for evaluating agents possessing both detergent and sterilizing properties. 15th International Dairy Congress London 3 1816–1821Google Scholar
Neave, F. K. & Hoy, W. A. 1947 The disinfection of contaminated metal surfaces with hypochlorite solutions. Journal of Dairy Research 15 24–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patterson, J. T. 1971 Microbiological assessment of surfaces. Journal of Food Technology 6 63–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patterson, J. T. & Stewart, D.J. 1962 Bacteriology of processed broilers. 1. Methods of examination. Research and Experimental Record of the Ministry of Agriculture (Northern Ireland) 11 57–63Google Scholar
Richard, J. 1980 Observations on the value of a swab technique for determining the bacteriological state of milking equipment surfaces. Journal of Applied Bacteriology 49 19–27CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Speers, J. G. S. 1982 The adherence of microorganisms to dairy equipment surfaces. Ph.D. Thesis, Queen's University of BelfastGoogle Scholar
Thomas, S. B., Griffiths, E., Elson, K. & Bebbington, N. B. 1955 The suitability of swab tests for determining the bacterial content of dairy equipment. Dairy Industries 20 41–43Google Scholar