Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-rkxrd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T12:49:10.778Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

56. The Nutritive Value of Proteins for Milk Production. I. A Comparison of the Proteins of Beans, Linseed, and Meat Meal

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2009

Samuel Morris
Affiliation:
The Hannah Dairy Research Institute, Kirkhill, Ayr.
Norman C. Wright
Affiliation:
The Hannah Dairy Research Institute, Kirkhill, Ayr.

Extract

The protein requirements for maintenance and milk production are based on the well-known investigations of Kellner, Armsby, Haecker, Savage and others, who recommend feeding standards varying from 0·5 to 0·;8 lb. digestible crude protein per 1000 lb. live weight for maintenance, and from 0·52 to 0·63 lb. digestible crude protein per 10 lb. milk for milk production. A detailed study of the work of these investigations shows that in many instances nitrogen equilibrium has been obtained on considerably lower planes of protein intake: but the figures have been arbitrarily raised, partly to provide a sufficient safeguard against underfeeding, and partly on the assumption that the excess food protein could exert a stimulating effect on mammary secretion. Recent investigations, particularly those of Hills and his associates (l), Perkins (2), Buschmann(3) and Savage and Harrison (4) indicate that the existing protein standards could, in fact, be considerably reduced. The above investigations have, however, been limited to a study of the quantity of protein required for maintenance and milk production, and no account has been taken of the possible effect of variations in the quality of proteins on their utilisation.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Proprietors of Journal of Dairy Research 1933

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

(1) Hills, et al. (1922). Vermont Agric. Exp. Sla. Bull. No. 225.Google Scholar
(2) Perkins, (1925). Ohio Agric. Exp. Sia. Bull. No. 389.Google Scholar
(3) Buschmann, (1931). Intern. Dairy Gongr. Copenhagen, 84.Google Scholar
(4) Savage, and Harrison, (1931). Intern. Dairy Gongr. Copenhagen, 1.Google Scholar
(5) Willcock, and Hopkins, (1907). J. Physiol. 35, 88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(6) Ackroyd, and Hopkins, (1916). Biochem. J. 10, 551.Google Scholar
(7) Osborne, and Mendel, (1915). J. Biol. Chem. 20, 351.Google Scholar
(8) Rose, and Cox, (1924). J. Biol. Chem. 61, 747.Google Scholar
(9) Mitchell, and Hamilton, (1929). The Biochemistry of the Amino-acids. Chemical Catalog Co., New York.Google Scholar
(10) Hart, and Humphrey, (1916). J. Biol. Chem. 26, 457.Google Scholar
(11) Zorn, and Richter, (1929). Z. Züchtungsk. 4, 421.Google Scholar
(12) Ritzman, and Benedict, (1929). New Hampshire Agric. Exp. Sta. Bull. No. 240.Google Scholar
(13) Kellner, . Quoted by Armsby, Nutrition of Farm Animals, 1928, p. 517.Google Scholar
(14) Sheehy, (1931). Intern. Dairy Congr. Copenhagen, 76.Google Scholar
(15) Brown, and Sutton, (1931). J. Dairy Sci. 14, 125.Google Scholar
(16) Ewing, and Smith, (1917). Quoted by Hammond, , The Physiology of Ruminant Digestion, 1928, p. 17.Google Scholar
(17) Rubner, (1908). Arch. Hyg. 66, 45.Google Scholar
(18) Folin, and Denis, (1912). J. Biol. Chem. 11, 94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(19) Cary, (1920). J. Biol. Chem. 43, 477.Google Scholar
(20) Blackwood, (1932). Biochem. J. 26, 772.Google Scholar
(21) Halnan, (1930). J. Dairy Research, 1, 1.Google Scholar
(22) Maynard, , Miller, and Krauss, (1928). Cornell Univ. Agric. Exp. Sta. Memoir, No. 113.Google Scholar
(23) Holdaway, , Ellett, and Harris, (1925). Virginia Agric. Exp. Sta. Bull. No. 28.Google Scholar
(24) Morgen, , Beger, and Westhauser, (1914). Landw. Vers. Stat. 85, 1.Google Scholar