Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-7drxs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-18T06:34:36.775Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

283. The keeping qualities of milk powders: Part I. Addition of antioxidants

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2009

R. Waite
R. Waite
Affiliation:
The Hannah Dairy Research Institute, Kirkhill, Ayr
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

1. Hydroquinone is an effective antioxidant for the butter-fat of spray-dried whole-milk powder, but in a concentration equivalent to 0·5% of the weight of fat (0·12% on the weight of powder) it produces an objectionable ‘metallic’ flavour in the powder and reconstituted milk.

2. Oat flour is much less efficient than hydroquinone as an antioxidant but 0·25% added to the milk, preferably before condensing, increases the resistance of the resultant powder to the development of tallowiness by the equivalent of about 4 months at normal temperatures. Raising the concentration of oat flour to 0·5% approximately doubles this increase but at the same time imparts a noticeable oat flavour to the powder.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Journal of Dairy Research , Volume 12 , Issue 2 , May 1941 , pp. 178 - 183
Copyright
Copyright © Proprietors of Journal of Dairy Research 1941

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

(1)Olcott, & Mattill, (1936). J. Amer. chem. Soc. 58, 1672.Google Scholar
(2)Hamilton, & Olcott, (1936). Oil & Soap, 8, 127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(3)Mattill, (1931). J. biol. Chem. 90, 141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(4)Lea, (1936). J. Soc. Chem. Ind., Lond., 55, 293T.Google Scholar
(5)French, Oloott, & Mattill, (1935). Industr. Engng Chem. 27, 725.Google Scholar
(6)Peters, & Musher, (1937). Industr. Engng Chem. 29, 147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(7)Waite, (1940). J. Soc. chem. Ind., Lond., 59, 659.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(8)Howat, , Smith, , Waite, & Wright, (1939). J. Dairy Res. 10, 498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(9)Smith, (1939). J. Dairy Res. 10, 294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar