Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-fwgfc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-12T02:20:20.864Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

270. Lancefield group B streptococci (Str. agalactiae) on the hands of milkers and others

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2009

J. Harrison
J. Harrison
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying, University of Reading
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Lancefield Group B streptococci have been recovered from the hands of milkers even in herds where infection was very light. Since these organisms had the biochemical reactions of Str. agalactiae, and since none were recovered from the hands of non-milkers, it is considered that they were identical with this organism and that the milkers' hands are a potential source of danger to cows. The methods of disinfection at present in use have been criticized and suggestions for improvements made.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Journal of Dairy Research , Volume 12 , Issue 1 , January 1941 , pp. 18 - 23
Copyright
Copyright © Proprietors of Journal of Dairy Research 1941

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

(1)Colebrook, L. & Maxted, W. R. (1938). The Prevention of Puerperal Sepsis. Manchester: Sherratt and Hughes. Reprint from J. Obst. Gynaec. (1933), 40, 966.Google Scholar
(2)Munch-Petersen, F. (1938). Bovine Mastitis. Imperial Bureau of Animal Health, Review series, No. 1.Google Scholar
(3)Price, P. B. (1938). J. infect. Dis. 63, 301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(4)Edwards, S. J. (1933). J. comp. Path. 46, 211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(5)Minett, F. C. (1936). J. Hyg. 35, 504.Google Scholar
(6)Shattock, P. M. F. (1940). Private communication.Google Scholar
(7)Mattick, A. T. R., Shattock, P. M. F. & Jacob, M. (1941). J. Dairy Res. (in the press).Google Scholar
(8)Hare, R. & Colebrook, L. (1934). J. Path. Bact. 39, 429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(9)Mattick, A. T. R., Hoy, W. A. & Neave, F. K. (1940). Private communication.Google Scholar