Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-8bljj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-23T05:32:31.461Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

726. Histological changes in the mammary gland of guinea-pigs during lactation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2009

M. Naito
M. Naito
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying, Shinfield, Reading, Berks.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Certain histological factors of the mammary gland and the DNA content unit per dry weight were studied at four stages of lactation in guinea-pigs.

The porosity index, the number of alveoli per field, the number of cells per field and the DNA content, showed maximal values at parturition and minimal values at the peak of lactation, whereas the opposite trend was shown by the value for modal alveolar diameter and the number of cells per modal alveolus.

The relationships between these results are discussed.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Journal of Dairy Research , Volume 25 , Issue 3 , October 1958 , pp. 392 - 396
Copyright
Copyright © Proprietors of Journal of Dairy Research 1958

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

(1)Naito, M., Shoda, Y. & Nagai, J. (1955). Endocrinol. Jap. 2, 205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2)Turner, C. W. & Schultze, A. B. (1931). Res. Bull. Mo. agric. Exp. Sta. no. 157.Google Scholar
(3)Turner, C. W. & Gomez, E. T. (1933 a). Res. Bull. Mo. agric. Exp. Sta. no. 182.Google Scholar
(4)Turner, C. W. & Gomez, E. T. (1933 b). Res. Bull. Mo. agric. Exp. Sta. no. 194.Google Scholar
(5)Naito, M. (1958). J. Dairy Res. 25, 17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(6)Cowie, A. T., Folley, S. J., Malpress, F. H. & Richardson, K. C. (1952). J. Endocrin, 8, 64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(7)Richardson, K. C. (1952). Quart. J. micr. Sci. 93, 371.Google Scholar
(8)Richardson, K. C. (1953). J. Endocrin. 9, 170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(9)Benson, G. K., Cowie, A. T., Cox, C. P., Flux, D. S. & Folley, S. J. (1955). J. Endocrin. 13, 46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(10)Eränko, O. (1955). Quantitative Methods in Histology and Microscopic Histochemistry. Basel and N.Y.: S. Karger.Google Scholar
(11)Benson, G. K., Cowie, A. T., Cox, C. P. & Goldzveig, S. A. (1957). J. Endocrin. 15, 126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(12)Schneider, W. C. (1945). J. biol. Chem. 161, 293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(13)Dische, Z. (1930). Mikrochemie, 8, 4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(14)Snedecor, G. W. (1956). Statistical Methods Applied to Experiments in Agriculture and Medical Research (5th ed.). Ames, Iowa, U.S.A.: Iowa State College Press.Google Scholar
(15)Fisher, R. A. & Yates, F. (1953). Statistical Tables for Biological, Agricultural and Medical Research (4th ed.). Edinburgh and London: Oliver and Boyd.Google Scholar
(16)Harkness, M. L. R. & Harkness, R. D. (1956). J. Physiol. 132, 476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(17)Griffith, D. R. & Turner, C. W. (1957). Proc. Soc. exp. Biol., N.Y., 95, 347.Google Scholar
(18)Damm, H. C. & Turner, C. W. (1957). Proc. Soc. exp. Biol., N.Y., 95, 466.Google Scholar
(19)Goto, T. & Ugami, S. (1952). Bull. Nat. Inst. agric. Sci. (Jap.), (G), (3), 1.Google Scholar
(20)Smith, T. C. (1956). Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 60, 485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(21)Heytler, P. G. (1956). Ph.D. Dissert. (18298), Cornell University.Google Scholar
(22)Greenbaum, A. L. & Slater, T. F. (1957). Biochem. J. 66, 155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(23)Shimizu, H. (1957). Tohoku J. agric. Res. 7, 339.Google Scholar