Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-v5vhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-27T02:57:06.478Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

414. Experiments on milking technique: 7. The effect of subjecting dairy cows, for a complete lactation, to a rigid control of the duration of milking

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2009

F. H. Dodd ,
A. S. Foot ,
Ettie Henriques  and
F. K. Neave
F. H. Dodd
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying, University of Reading
A. S. Foot
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying, University of Reading
Ettie Henriques
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying, University of Reading
F. K. Neave
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying, University of Reading
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

1. Thirty-eight first-calf heifers in two equal groups were subjected for complete lactations to a rigid control of the duration of milking to either 4 or 8 min.

2. The treatment had no major effect on the milking rates of either group.

3. Whilst 4 min. was insufficient time to milk out completely the udders of about half the animals on this treatment, the machines on the 8 min. treatment were generally left on for a period after milk flow had stopped.

4. There was no significant difference between the 305-day lactation yields of the two groups or in the persistency. The 4 min. treatment did, however, decrease the yield of milk and fat in early lactation.

5. The 8 min. cows had more clinical and subclinical mastitis, though they did not have a higher proportion of eroded teats nor higher Whiteside test readings.

6. Teat erosion appeared to be correlated with slow milking.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Journal of Dairy Research , Volume 17 , Issue 2 , June 1950 , pp. 107 - 116
Copyright
Copyright © Proprietors of Journal of Dairy Research 1950

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

(1)Dodd, F. H. & Foot, A. S. (1947). J. Dairy Res. 15, 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2)Dodd, F. H. & Foot, A. S. (1948). J. Dairy Res. 16, 14.Google Scholar
(3)Dodd, F. H., Foot, A. S. & Ettie, Henriqites (1950). J. Dairy Res. 16, 301.Google Scholar
(4)Foot, A. S. (1935). J. Dairy Res. 6, 313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(5)Murphy, J. M. & Hanson, J. J. (1941). Cornell Vet. 31, 47.Google Scholar
(6)Murphy, J. M. (1942). Cornell Vet. 32, 439.Google Scholar
(7)Smith, V. R. & Petersen, W. E. (1948). J. Dairy Sci. 31, 589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(8)Johansson, I. (1935). 12th Int. Dairy Congr. 1, 399.Google Scholar
(9)Schalm, O. W. & Mead, S. W. (1943). J. Dairy Sci. 26, 823.CrossRefGoogle Scholar