Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-qsmjn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-20T01:16:56.276Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

326. The effect of temperature of pre-heating, of clarification and of bacteriological quality of the raw milk on the keeping properties of whole-milk powder dried by the Kestner Spray Process

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2009

A. T. K. Mattick ,
Edith R. Hiscox ,
E. L. Crossley ,
C. H. Lea ,
J. D. Findlay ,
J. A. B. Smith ,
S. Y. Thompson ,
S. K. Kon  and
J. W. Egdell
A. T. K. Mattick
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying, University of Reading
Edith R. Hiscox
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying, University of Reading
E. L. Crossley
Affiliation:
Aplin and Barrett, Ltd., Yeovil
C. H. Lea
Affiliation:
Low Temperature Research Station, Cambridge
J. D. Findlay
Affiliation:
Hannah Dairy Research Institute, Kirkhill, Ayr
J. A. B. Smith
Affiliation:
Hannah Dairy Research Institute, Kirkhill, Ayr
S. Y. Thompson
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying, University of Reading
S. K. Kon
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying, University of Reading
J. W. Egdell
Affiliation:
University of Bristol
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

(1) Increasing the pre-heating temperature of the milk from 165 to 190° F. before spray-drying greatly improved the resistance of the powder to the development of tallowy ‘off’-flavours on storage. From the results of accelerated tests at 47 and 37° C. a storage life (in air) of the order of 2 years could safely be predicted for the powders from milk pre-heated at the higher temperature. Confirmation has now been obtained by storage of the powders for 2½ years at 15° C. and at room temperature.

(2) Improvement in the bacteriological quality of the milk supply, and more careful control during its passage through the plant, produced some improvement in the keeping properties of powders prepared from milk pre-heated at the lower temperature, but had relatively little effect on the keeping properties of the powder when the higher preheating temperature was used.

(3) The shapes of the deterioration curves for the various powders showed that the effect of the higher pre-heating temperature and of improvement in the milk supply was to extend the induction period which precedes rapid deterioration. The protective effect of both factors was greater when measured at the ‘slightly tallowy’ or ‘fairly good’ stage than when comparison was made at a more advanced stage of decomposition.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Journal of Dairy Research , Volume 14 , Issue 1-2 , March 1945 , pp. 116 - 159
Copyright
Copyright © Proprietors of Journal of Dairy Research 1945

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

(1)Ceossley, E. L. ' Johnson, W. A. (1942). J. Dairy Res. 13, 5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1)Lea, C. H., Moran, T. & Smith, J. A. B. (1943). J. Dairy Res. 13, 162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2)Holm, G. E., Greenback, G. R. & Deysher, E. F. (1926). J. Dairy Sci. 9, 512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(3)Kende, S. (1932). Milchw. Forsch. 13, 111.Google Scholar
(4)Scheib, B. J., Stark, C. N. & Guthrie, E. S. (1942). J. Dairy Sci. 25, 25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(5)Dahle, C. D., Lawhorn, R. K. & Barnhart, J. L. (1941). J. Dairy Sci. 24, A181.Google Scholar
(6)Trout, G. M. (1942). Canad. Dairy Ice Cr. J. 21, no. 7, 22.Google Scholar
(7)Hollender, H. A. & Tracy, P. H. (1942). J. Dairy Sci. 25, 249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(8)Jack, E. L. & Henderson, J. L. (1942). Food Industr. 14, 50.Google Scholar
(9)Howat, G. R., Smith, J. A. B., Waite, R. & Wright, N. C. (1939). J. Dairy Res. 10, 498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(10)Gould, I. A. & Sommer, H. H. (1939). Tech. Bull. Mich agric. Exp. Sta. no. 164.Google Scholar
(11)Townley, R. C. & Gottld, I. A. (1943). J. Dairy Sci. 26, 689.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(12)Josephson, D. V. & Doan, F. J. (1939). Milk Dlr, 29, 35.Google Scholar
(13)Sylvester, N. D. & Lampitt, L. H. (1935). Analyst, 60, 376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(14)Chapman, R. A. & McFarlane, W. D. (1943). Canad. J. Res. B, 21, 133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1)NICHOLS, A. (1939). J. Dairy Res. 10, 202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2)Ministry of Agriculture and Fisheries (1943). Form No. C 158/T.P.Y.Google Scholar
(3)Crossley, E. L. & Johnson, W. (1942). J. Dairy Res. 13, 5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(4)Crossley, E. L. (1941). J. Soc. chem. Ind., Land., 60, 131T.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(5)Orla-Jensen, S. (1919). The Lactic Acid Bacteria. Copenhagen: Høst.Google Scholar
(6)Gibson, T. (1940). Abstr. Proc. Soc. agric. Bact. p. 19.Google Scholar
(1)Mattick, E. C. V. & Kay, H. D. (1938). J. Dairy Res. 9, 58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2)Ceossley, E. L. & Johnson, W. A. (1942). J. Dairy Res. 13, 5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1)Henry, Houston, Kon, & Osborne, (1939). J. Dairy Res. 10, 272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2)Houston, Kon, & Lea, (1941). Unpublished work.Google Scholar
(3)Kon, (1943). Chem. & Ind. 62, 478.Google Scholar
(4)Knight, Dutcher, & Guerrant, (1939). Science, 89, 183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(5)Kon, & Watson, (1936). Biochem. J. 30, 2273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(6)Doan, & Josephson, (1943). J. Dairy Sci. 26, 1031.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(7)Houston, Kon, & Thompson, (1940). J. Dairy Res. 11, 67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(8)Henry, Houston, Kon, & Thompson, (1944). J. Dairy Res. 13, 329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(9)Olson, Hegsted, & Peterson, (1939). J. Dairy Sci. 22, 63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(10)Gillam, Henry, & Kon, (1937). Milk and Nutrition, Part I, p. 45. Reading: Nat. Inst. Res. Dairying.Google Scholar
(11)Thompson, (1942). Chem. & Ind. 61, 170.Google Scholar