Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-pjpqr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-21T07:24:03.389Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

549 A Nationwide Pilot Study Testing a Remotely-Delivered Prolonged Nightly Fasting Intervention in Stressed Midlife Adults Living with Obesity and Memory Decline

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 April 2024

Dara L. James
Affiliation:
Arizona State University
Linda K. Larkey
Affiliation:
Arizona State University
Molly Maxfield
Affiliation:
Arizona State University
Edward Ofori
Affiliation:
Arizona State University
Nanako A. Hawley
Affiliation:
University of South Alabama
Kate Alperin
Affiliation:
Arizona State University
Peyton Osha
Affiliation:
Arizona State University
Chung Jung Mun
Affiliation:
Arizona State University
Dorothy D. Sears
Affiliation:
Arizona State University
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

OBJECTIVES/GOALS: Cognitive decline is associated with obesity, stress, poor sleep, and circadian rhythm misalignment, which are themselves functionally intertwined. Irregular food intake timing exacerbates these all. Prolonged nightly fasting (PNF) aligns food intake with innate circadian rhythms. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: A nationwide, remotely-delivered, 2-arm randomized controlled trial was conducted to assess feasibility and 8-week outcomes of cognition, stress, sleep, eating behaviors, and general eating habits, after a PNF intervention (14-hr nightly fast, 6 nights/week, no calories after 8pm) compared to a health education control (HEC) condition. Eligible participants were living with obesity, stress (Perceived stress scale-4 (PSS-4) total score ≥5), and memory “not as good as it used to be.” Data were collected via Zoom meetings with participants and trained staff and entered into REDCap. All participants had weekly staff check-in calls to report fasting times (PNF group only) and feedback. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: Eligible participants were enrolled from 37 of 50 US states; N=58, 86% women, 71% white, 93% non-Latinx, mean (SD) 50.1 (5.1) years of age, BMI 35.6 (3.6) kg/m^2. No group differences existed at baseline. Linear mixed-effects models were used to compare group differences across all outcome changes. Compared to the HEC condition, the PNF intervention was associated with improved sleep quality (Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index; B = -2.52; SE = 0.90; 95% CI-4.30 to -0.74; p=0.006). Stress, everyday cognition, and emotional eating behavior significantly changed over time (p<0.02), but there were no group differences. Analysis of feasibility outcomes are on-going. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE: Changing food intake timing 6 days per week, to exclude nighttime eating without mandating food quality/quantity change, may benefit many individuals living with obesity, stress and memory decline to improve their sleep. Improved sleep quality may lead to more health benefits over time.

Type
Team Science
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2024. The Association for Clinical and Translational Science