Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-nr4z6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-23T13:35:23.623Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

SVO comprehension strategies reconsidered: the evidence of individual patterns of response*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 September 2008

Allayne Bridges
Allayne Bridges
Affiliation:
University of Birmingham
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Several researchers (e.g. Bever 1970, Strohner & Nelson 1974) have suggested that young children commonly employ a word-order strategy of the form: ‘the first mentioned participant is agent’ when interpreting active and passive sentences. Pre-school children (aged 2; 6–5; 0) were presented with reversible active and passive sentences in four comprehension test settings (two acting-out tasks, a selection task and a verification task). Their responses were analysed not in terms of the percentage correct responses for each group of subjects, as has been the usual practice, but in terms of each individual child's pattern of responses. The results revealed age-related changes in the type of response patterns found. The response pattern associated with the word-order strategy was not a frequent occurrence. The most common patterns were those accounted for by extralinguistic cues such as the relative proximity, mobility or position of the referents. The significance of early interpretation rules of this sort for any characterization of young children's language comprehension processes is discussed.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Child Language , Volume 7 , Issue 1 , February 1980 , pp. 89 - 104
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1980

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

[*]

The research reported in this paper formed one section of a doctoral dissertation submitted by the author to the University of Bristol and was supported by SSRC Grant (S/736185/ED). Address for correspondence: Dept. of Psychology, University of Birmingham P.O. Box 363, Birmingham B15 2TT.

References

REFERENCES

Baldie, B. J. (1976). The acquisition of the passive voice. JChLang 3. 331–48.Google Scholar
Bem, S. (1970). The role of comprehension in children's problem solving. DevPsych 2. 351–8.Google Scholar
Bever, T. G. (1970). The cognitive basis for linguistic structure. In Hayes, J. R. (ed.), Cognition and the development of language. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Bloom, L. (1974). Talking, understanding and thinking. In Schiefelbusch, R. L. & Lloyd, L. L. (eds), Language perspectives: acquisition, retardation and intervention. Baltimore: University Park Press.Google Scholar
Brown, A. L. (1975). The development of memory; knowing, knowing about knowing and knowing how to know. In Reese, H. M. (ed.), Advances in child development & behavior. Vol. 10. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Chapman, R. S. (1974). Discussion summary: developmental relationship between receptive and expressive language. In Schiefelbusch, R. L. & Lloyd, L. L. (eds), Language perspectives: acquisition, retardation and intervention. Baltimore: University Park Press.Google Scholar
Chapman, R. S. (1978). Comprehension strategies in children. In Kavanagh, J. F. & Strange, W. (eds), Speech & language in laboratory, school and clinic. Cambridge Mass.: M.I.T.Google Scholar
Chapman, R. S. & Miller, J. F. (1975). Word order in early two and three word utterances: does production precede comprehension? JSHR 18. 355–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chapman, R. S. & Kohn, L. L. (1977). Comprehension strategies in two and three year olds: animate agents or probable events? Paper presented to Stanford Child Language Research Forum, Stanford University,California.Google Scholar
Clark, E. V. (1973). Non-linguistic strategies and the acquisition of word meaning. Cognition 2. 161–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cromer, R. F. (1976). Developmental strategies for language. In Hamilton, V. & Vernon, M. D. (eds), The development of cognitive processes. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
De Villiers, J. G. & De Villiers, P. A. (1973). The development of the use of word order in comprehension. JPsycholingRes 2. 331–41.Google ScholarPubMed
De Villiers, J. G. & De Villiers, P. A. (1974). Competence and performance in child language: are children really competent to judge? JChLang I. 11–23.Google Scholar
Dewart, M. H. (1975) A psychological investigation of sentence comprehension by children. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, University College London.Google Scholar
Donaldson, M. & McGarrigle, J. (1974). Some clues to the nature of semantic development. JChLang i. 185–94.Google Scholar
Donaldson, M. & Lloyd, P. (1975). Sentences and situations: children's judgements about match and mismatch. In Bressen, F. (ed.), Current problems in psycholinguistics. Paris: CNRS.Google Scholar
Fraser, C., Bellugi, U. & Brown, R. (1963). Control of grammar in imitation, comprehension and production. JVLVB 2. 121–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoogenraad, R., Grieve, R., Baldwin, P. & Campbell, R. (1978). Comprehension as an interactive process. In Campbell, R. N. & Smith, P. (eds), Stirling psychology of language conference. Vol. I: language development and mother-child interaction. London: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
Huttenlocher, J. & Strauss, S. (1968). Comprehension and a statement's relation to the situation it describes. JVLVB 7. 300–4.Google Scholar
Huttenlocher, J. & Weiner, S. (1971). Comprehension of instruction in varying contexts. CogPsych 2. 369–85.Google Scholar
Lempert, H. (1978). Extrasyntactic factors affecting passive sentence comprehension by young children. ChDev 49. 694–9.Google Scholar
Lovell, K. & Dixon, E. M. (1967). The growth and control of grammar in imitation, comprehension and production. JChPsycholPsychiat 8. 31–9.Google Scholar
Lowe, M. (1975). Trends in the development of representational play in infants from one to three years – an observational study. JChPsychPsychiat 16. 33–47.Google Scholar
Maratsos, M. (1974). Children who get worse at understanding the passive: a replication of Bever. JPsycholingRes 3. 65–74.Google Scholar
Sinclair, H. & Bronckart, J. P. (1972). SVO: a linguistic universal? A study in developmental psycholinguistics. JExpChPsychol 14. 329–48.Google Scholar
Strohner, H. & Nelson, K. (1974). The young child's development of sentence comprehension: the influence of event probability, non-verbal context, syntactic form and strategies. ChDev 45. 567–76.Google Scholar
Wetstone, H. S. & Friedlander, B. Z. (1973). The effect of word order on young children's responses to simple questions and commands. ChDev 44. 734–40.Google Scholar
Wilcox, S. & Palermo, D. (1975). ‘In’, ‘on’, and ‘under’ revisited. Cognition 3. 245–54.Google Scholar