Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-cjp7w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-26T20:25:34.679Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Some differences between English plural noun inflections and third singular verb inflections in the input: the contributions of frequency, sentence position, and duration

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 October 1999

LI HSIEH
Affiliation:
Purdue University
LAURENCE B. LEONARD
Affiliation:
Purdue University
LORI SWANSON
Affiliation:
University of Tennessee

Abstract

Grammatical inflections such as the English plural noun -s and third person singular verb -s are acquired at different points in time by young children. This finding is typically attributed to factors such as relative semantic salience or the distinction between lexical and functional categories. In this study input frequency, sentence position, and duration were examined as possible contributing factors. In both conversations with and stories aimed at young children, noun plural inflections were found to be more frequent than third singular verb inflections, especially in sentence-final position. Analysis of the speech of four mothers reading stories to their two-year-old children confirmed that duration differences also exist in the input. Because fricatives were lengthened in sentence-final position and plural nouns were much more likely to appear in these positions than were third singular verb forms, plural nouns were significantly longer than third singular inflections on average. The possible implications of these findings for language learnability theories and accounts of grammatical deficits in specific language impairment are discussed.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 1999 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

This research was supported in part by research grant number 5 R01 DC 00–458 from the National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders, National Institutes of Health. The authors would like to thank Dr. Jack Gandour for his advice during the analysis phase of the study, and Jennifer Huntsman for her participation in the reliability assessment.