Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4hhp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-01T10:05:48.145Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

First steps in the acquisition of Spanish stress*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 February 2009

Judith G. Hochberg*
Affiliation:
University of Chicago
*
Committee on Child Development, 5835 South Kimbark Avenue, Chicago, IL 60637, USA

Abstract

This article uses longitudinal data from four Mexican-American children to explore two aspects of the acquisition of Spanish word stress that precede and accompany learning of the stress system itself. First, contrary to Allen & Hawkins' proposed universal ‘trochaic bias’ (Allen 1982, Allen & Hawkins 1977, 1979, 1980), it is shown that children have a ‘neutral start’ in stress learning: they approach the task of stress learning unbiased towards any particular stress type. Secondly, several examples are found in which children's attention to phonetic or semantic aspects of normatively unstressed syllables leads them to shift stress to that syllable.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

This work was supported by Stanford University, NICHD 5Roi HD 18908, and NICHD DHMC 5 T32 HD07307-02 HLB. I would like to thank Eve Clark, Charles Ferguson, Susan Goldin-Meadow, Paul Kiparsky, Karen Landahl and Marilyn Vihman for many valuable discussions and comments on previous drafts. I am also grateful to the Stanford Child Phonology Project, and especially Marlys Macken, for generously allowing me the use of their data and facilities.

References

REFERENCES

Allen, G. D. (1982). Intensity accents in French 2 year olds' speech. Papers and Reports on Child Language Development 21. 119–24.Google Scholar
Allen, G. D. & Hawkins, S. (1977). The development of phonological rhythm. Presymposium paper for the Segment Organization Symposium, Boulder, Colorado.Google Scholar
Allen, G. D. & Hawkins, S. (1979). Trochaic rhythm in children's speech. In Hollien, H. & Hollien, P. (eds), Current issues in the phonetic sciences. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Allen, G. D. & Hawkins, S. (1980). Phonological rhythm: definition and development. In Yeni-Komshian, G., Kavanagh, J. F. & Ferguson, C. A. (eds), Child Phonology. Vol. 1. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Anderson, R. & Smith, B. (1987). Phonological development of two-year-old monolingual Puerto Rican Spanish-speaking children. Journal of Child Language 14. 5778.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Burling, R. (1966). The metrics of children's verse: a cross-linguistic study. American Anthropologist 68. 1418–41.Google Scholar
Bush, C., Edwards, M. L., Luckau, J. M., Stoel, C. M., Macken, M. A. & Peterson, J. D. (1973). On specifying a system for transcribing consonants in child language: A working paper with examples from American English and Mexican Spanish. Stanford: Stanford University (Department of Linguistics).Google Scholar
Casagrande, J. B. (1948). Comanche baby language. International Journal of American Linguistics 14. 1114.Google Scholar
Ferguson, C. A. (1964). Baby talk in six languages. American Anthropologist 66. 103–14.Google Scholar
Ferguson, C. A. & Slobin, D. I. (eds) (1973). Studies of Child Language Development. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Hochberg, J. (1986). The acquisition of word stress rules in Spanish. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Stanford University.Google Scholar
Hochberg, J. (1987 a). Acquisition data and phonological theory: the case of Spanish stress. In J. Aske, N. Beery, L. Michaelis & H. Filip (eds), Proceedings of the Thirteenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hochberg, J. (1987 b). The acquisition of word stress rules in Spanish. Papers and Reports in Child Language Development 26. 5663.Google Scholar
Hooper, J. & Terrell, T. (1976). Stress assignment in Spanish: a natural generative analysis. Glossa 10. 64110.Google Scholar
Klein, H. (1984). Learning to stress: a case study. Journal of Child Language 11. 375–90.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leopold, W. F. (1947). Speech development of a bilingual child. Vol. 2. Sound-learning in the first two years. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Macken, M. A. (1978). Permitted complexity in phonological development: one child's acquisition of Spanish consonants. Lingua 44. 219–53.Google Scholar
Macken, M. A. (1979). Developmental reorganization of phonology: a hierarchy of basic units of acquisition. Lingua 49. 1149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montes Giraldo, J. J. (1971). Acerca de la apropriación por el niño del sistema fonológico español. Thesaurus: Boletín del instituto caro y cuervo 26. 322–46.Google Scholar
Slobin, D. I. (1973). Cognitive prerequisites for the development of grammar. In Ferguson, C. A. & Slobin, D. I. (eds), Studies of Child Language Development. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Smith, N. V. (1973). The acquisition of phonology: a case study. Cambridge: C.U.P.Google Scholar
Stockwell, R. P. & Bowen, J. D. (1965). The sounds of English and Spanish. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Stoel, C. (1974). The acquisition of liquids in Spanish. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Stanford University.Google Scholar
Stoel-Gammon, C. (1976). Baby talk in Brazilian Portuguese. Papers and Reports on Child Language Development 11. 83–8.Google Scholar
United States Census Bureau (1973). Neighborhood statistics program: geographic definition of neighborhoods [for Redwood City, California]. Washington DC: United States Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census.Google Scholar
Von Raffler-Engel, W. (1973). The development from sound to phoneme in child language. In Ferguson, C. A. & Slobin, D. I. (eds), Studies of Child Language Development. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Whitley, S. (1976). Stress in Spanish: two approaches. Lingua 39. 301–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar