Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-skm99 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T06:06:20.665Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Children's communicative abilities revisited: verbal versus perceptual disambiguating strategies in referential communication*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 February 2009

Joel Pynte ,
Vittorio Girotto  and
Thierry Baccino
Joel Pynte*
Affiliation:
CNRS and Université de Provence
Vittorio Girotto
Affiliation:
Istituto di Psicologia del CNR, Rome
Thierry Baccino
Affiliation:
CNRS and Université de Provence
*
CREPCO, Université de Provence, 29, Av. R. Schumann, 13621 Aix-en-Provence, France.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The way seven- and nine-year-old French children and adults interpret ambiguous object descriptions was studied in four experiments. All four experiments followed the same basic procedure and consisted of two phases. During the training phase, plastic blocks varying in shape, colour and size were associated with fruit names. Some objects were always given just one label, the generic term, whereas others could be given either the generic or the specific label. For example, large circles were referred to as ‘pommes’ (‘apples’), and large BLUE circles as ‘reinettes’ (a kind of apple). Still others were given no name at all. During the test phase of the experiment, subjects were presented with referentially ambiguous messages and asked to point to a given object (Experiments 1, 2 and 3) or to draw an object (Experiment 4). The messages consisted of either a generic term preceded by an article (e.g. ‘(la pomme’ – ‘the apple’) or a verbal description based on a colour adjective (e.g. ‘le bleu’ – ‘the blue one’). When presented with the generic term, older children and adults persistently chose the object for which no specific term had been given during the training phase. When presented with an adjective description, they chose the referent for which no fruit name had been given during the training phase. Younger children's choices depended on whether the article preceding the description was definite or indefinite. These results are consistent with the Gricean approach to referential communication proposed by Jackson & Jacobs (1982) and with an extended version of the principle of contrast proposed by Clark (1987, 1988).

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Child Language , Volume 18 , Issue 1 , February 1991 , pp. 191 - 213
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

The authors are grateful to the children and staff of Cuques and Marcel Pagnol Schools in Aix-en-Provence, France, for their co-operation. The research reported here was partly supported by grants from the Ministère des Affaires Etrangères, France, and the CNR, Italy, to Vittorio Girotto.

References

REFERENCES

Ackerman, B. P. (1978). Children's comprehension of presupposed information: logical and pragmatic inferences to speaker belief. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 26. 92–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ackerman, B. P. (1981). When is a question not answered? The understanding of young children of utterances violating or conforming to the rules of conversational sequencing. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 31. 487–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Asher, S. R. (1976). Children's inability to appraise their own and another person's communication performance. Developmental Psychology 12. 24–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ausubel, D. P. (1968). Educational psychology: a cognitive view. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.Google Scholar
Benelli, B. (1988). On the linguistic origin of superordinate categorization. Human Development 31. 20–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bredard, S. (1983). Pragmatic inference and young children's referential choices after ambiguous messages. Paper given at the First European Meeting on the Experimental Analysis of Behaviour, Liège, Belgium.Google Scholar
Bredard, S. (1984). Children's interpretation of referential ambiguities and pragmatic inference. Journal of Child Language 11. 665–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bredard, S. (1987). Is the quantity maxim strategy child-specific? Journal of Child Language 14. 175–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chase, W. G. & Clark, H. H. (1972). Mental operations in the comparison of sentences and pictures. In Gregg, L. (ed.), Cognition in learning and memory. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Clark, E. (1987). The principle of contrast: a constraint on language acquisition. In MacWhinney, B. (ed.), Mechanisms of language acqusition. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Clark, E. (1988). On the logic of contrast. Journal of Child Language 15. 317–35.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cruse, D. A. (1977). The pragmatics of lexical specificity. Journal of Linguistics 13, 153–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deutsch, W. (1985). Language production and comprehension: two sides of the same coin? Report No. 72/1985, Research Group on Perception & Action at the Center for Interdisciplinary Research (ZIF), University of Bielefeld.Google Scholar
Emslie, H., & Stevenson, R. (1981). Preschool children's use of the article in definite and indefinite referring expressions. Journal of Child Language 8. 313–28.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Flavell, J. H., Botkin, P. T., Fry, D. L. Jr., Wright, J. W., & Jarvis, P. E. (1968). The development of role-taking and communication skills in children. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Ford, W. & Olson, D. (1975). The elaboration of the noun phrase in children's description of objects. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 19. 371–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In Cole, P. & Morgan, J. L. (eds), Syntax and Semantics, vol. 3, New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Ironsmith, M. & Whitehurst, G. J. (1978). The development of listeners' abilities in communication: how children deal with ambiguous information. Child Development 49. 348–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, S. & Jacobs, S. (1982). Ambiguity and implicature in children's discourse comprehension. Journal of Child Language 9. 209–16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Job, R. & Surian, L. (1989). Typicality effects in children's production of referential messages. Dipartimento di Psicologia dello Sviluppo e della Socializzazione, Università di Padova, Italy.Google Scholar
Power, R. J. D., & Dal Martello, M. F. (1986). The use of the definite and indefinite articles by Italian preschool children. Journal of Child Language 13. 145–54.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Robinson, E. J. (1981). The child's understanding of inadequate messages and communication failure: a problem of ignorance or egocentrism? In Dickson, W. P. (ed.), Children's oral communication skills. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Singer, J. B., & Flavell, J. H. (1981). Development of knowledge about communication: children's evaluation of explicitly ambiguous messages. Child Development 52. 1211–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sonnenschein, S. (1988). The development of referential communication: speaking to different listeners. Child Development 59. 694–702.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stern, W. (1914). Psychologie der fruehen kindhalt. Leipzig: Quelle & Meyer (cited by L. Vygotsky, Thought and language. Cambridge MA: M.I.T. Press, 1962, 26–7).Google Scholar
Surian, L., & Job, R. (1987). Children's use of conversational rules in a referential communication task. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 16. 369–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, M. & Gelman, S. A. (1988). Adjectives and nouns: children's strategies for learning new words. Child Development 59. 411–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vygotsky, L. S. (1962). Thought and language. Cambridge MA: M.I.T. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, T. G. (1982). Naming practices, typicality, and underextension in child language. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 33. 324–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitehurst, G. J. & Sonnenschein, S. (1978). The development of communication: attribute variation leads to contrast failure. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 25. 490–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar