Hostname: page-component-5d59c44645-ndqjc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-02-27T19:35:58.518Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Constraints on the computational component vs. grammar in the lexicon: a discussion of Bates & Goodman

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 November 2000

JOHN GRINSTEAD
Affiliation:
University of Northern Iowa

Abstract

In The emergence of language, it is argued that much of what generative linguistics has characterized as ‘rules’ in fact can be derived from domain- general cognitive mechanisms. One example of this perspective is Bates & Goodman's contribution ‘On the emergence of grammar in the lexicon’, which Sabbagh & Gelman say offers ‘…a series of compelling arguments detailing how development and early acquisition shape the subsequent acquisition of new information.’ The thrust of the argument presented by Bates & Goodman is that there is no need to posit the existence of an independent grammar domain, because grammar can be reduced to the lexicon, which in Bates & Goodman's account, can be acquired using general purpose mechanisms. One of several major arguments in favour of this position presented by the authors is that grammar and vocabulary grow at the same rates in child speech. Thus, the authors argue that the development of the lexicon and grammar correlate because there is no grammar outside of the lexicon.

Type
REVIEW ARTICLE AND DISCUSSION
Copyright
© 2000 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)