Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-gtxcr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-18T23:56:51.371Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Biopolitics of Manning the Royal Navy in Late Stuart England

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 July 2017

Matthew Neufeld
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article examines the Royal Navy's implementation between 1690 and 1710 of new and publicly controversial policies, grounded in quantitative technologies, to manage the multitude of English seamen. These policies and their promotion can be profitably interpreted using the Foucauldian concept of biopolitics. Naval biopolitics meant mobilizing and promoting political arithmetic in the service of the fiscal-naval state. Thus, naval biopolitics was both a new model of statecraft and a form of state publicity, that is, a genre of works that strove to influence government policy and public opinion by promoting projects that a polemicist argued the state could and should undertake to better govern its subjects. The directives, legislation, and pamphlet literature of naval biopolitics projected a fiscal-naval state capable of counting, tracking, and mobilizing the national stock of seamen onto its ships in a predictable, salubrious, and, most crucially, orderly fashion. However, English naval biopolitics endured much longer as a genre of state propaganda than as a method of mobilizing the population of seamen onto ships.

Keywords

Stuart EnglandRoyal NavyBiopoliticsManpowerSeamenParliamentImpressmentSeamen's RegisterHealthcare
Type
Articles
Information
Journal of British Studies , Volume 56 , Issue 3 , July 2017 , pp. 506 - 531
Copyright
Copyright © The North American Conference on British Studies 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 ADL/J/8, National Maritime Museum, Greenwich (hereafter NMM).

2 Rodger, N. A. M., The Command of the Ocean: A Naval History of Britain (London, 2002), 209–10Google Scholar.

3 Foucault, Michel, The Birth of Biopolitics: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1978–79, trans. Burchell, Graham (Basingstoke, 1999), 317–25Google Scholar; idem, “Society Must Be Defended”: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1975–76, ed. Bertani, Mauro and Fontana, Alessandro, trans. Macey, David (New York, 2003), 35, 242–48Google Scholar.

4 Jenner, Mark S. R. and Taithe, Bertrand O., “The Historiographical Body,” in Companion to Medicine in the Twentieth Century, ed. Cooter, Roger and Pickstone, John (New York, 2003), 187–200, at 191Google Scholar; McCormick, Ted, William Petty and the Ambitions of Political Arithmetic (New York, 2009), 7–10 Google Scholar; Rodger, N. A. M., “From the ‘Military Revolution’ to the ‘Fiscal-Naval State,’” Journal for Maritime Research 13, no. 2 (November 2011): 119–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Page, Anthony, “The Seventy Years War, 1744–1815, and Britain's Fiscal-Naval State,” War and Society 34, no. 3 (July 2015): 162–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

5 Wakefield, Andre, The Disordered Police State: German Cameralism as Science and Practice (Chicago, 2009), 80, 142Google Scholar.

6 Defoe, Daniel, An Essay upon Projects, Wing D832 [English Short-Title Catalogue Reference Number] (London, 1697), 10–11 Google Scholar. See also the section “Of Seamen,” 124–32.

7 Foucault, Michel, Security, Territory, Population: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1977–78, ed. Senellart, Michel, trans. Burchell, Graham (New York, 2007), 68–72, 104–9Google Scholar.

8 Appleby, Joyce Oldham, Economic Thought and Ideology in Seventeenth-Century England (Princeton, 1978), 136–37Google Scholar; Rusnock, Andrea, Vital Accounts: Quantifying Health and Population in Eighteenth-Century England (Cambridge, 2002), 4, 183–85Google Scholar; Stein, Claudia, “The Birth of Biopower in Eighteenth-Century Germany,” Medical History 55, no. 3 (July 2011): 331–37Google Scholar; McCormick, Ted, “Population: Modes of Seventeenth-Century Demographic Thought,” in Mercantilism Reimagined: Political Economy in Early Modern Britain and its Empire, ed. Stern, Philip J. and Wennerlind, Carl (New York, 2013), 25–45 Google Scholar.

9 For the opportunities in Hakluyt's, Richard “Discourse of Western Planting,” see David Armitage, The Ideological Origins of the British Empire (New York, 2000), 74–75 Google Scholar.

10 McCormick, William Petty, 93–101; Rosen, George, “Medical Care and Social Policy in Seventeenth Century England,” in From Medical Police to Social Medicine: Essays on the History of Health Care (New York, 1974), 159–75, at 163Google Scholar.

11 Wilson, Kathleen, “Rethinking the Colonial State: Family, Gender and Governmentality in Eighteenth-Century British Frontiers,” American Historical Review 116, no. 5 (December 2011): 1294–1322 Google Scholar; Paugh, Katherine, “The Politics of Childbearing in the British Caribbean and the Atlantic World during the Age of Abolition, 1776, 1838,” Past and Present 221 (November 2013): 119–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

12 Brewer, John, The Sinews of Power: War, Money and the English State, 1688–1783 (London, 1989), Table 2.1Google Scholar.

13 Baugh, Daniel, British Naval Administration in the Age of Walpole (Princeton, 1965), 239–40Google Scholar; Stephen Francis Gradish, “The Manning of the British Navy during the Seven Years War” (PhD diss., University of Toronto, 1971); Bromley, J. S., introduction to The Manning of the Royal Navy: Selected Public Pamphlets, 1693–1873 (London, 1976), xiii–xlvGoogle Scholar.

14 Rediker, Marcus, Between the Devil and the Deep Blue Sea: Merchant Seamen, Pirates and the Anglo-American Maritime World, 1700–1750 (New York, 1987), 16–17, 31–35 Google Scholar; Wrightson, Keith, Earthly Necessities: Economic Lives in Early Modern Britain (New Haven, 2000), 229–35, 316–17Google Scholar; Slack, Paul, “Plenty of People”: Perceptions of Population in Early Modern England (Reading, 2011)Google Scholar.

15 Estimate of the total number of seamen in England in 1700, 2 December 1703, BL Add. MSS. 5439, fol. 164; “Admiralty to Sir Robert Rich, Orders and Instructions for Impressing Seamen,” 23 February 1694, Rich Papers, X.d. 451 (116), fol. 1r-v, Folger Shakespeare Library (hereafter FSL), Washington, DC; James A. Johnston, “Parliament and the Navy, 1688–1714,” (PhD diss., University of Sheffield, 1968), 308; Starkey, David J., “War and the Market for Seafarers in Britain, 1736–1792,” in Shipping and Trade, 1750–1950: Essays in International Maritime Economic History, ed. Fischer, Lewis R. and Nordvik, Helge W. (Pontefract, 1990), 25–42 Google Scholar.

16 For an introduction, see Blakemore, Richard J., “The Legal World of English Sailors, c. 1575–1729,” in Law, Labour and Empire: Comparative Perspectives on Seafarers, c. 1500–1800, ed. Fusaro, Maria, Allaire, Bernard, Blakemore, Richard J., and Vanneste, Tijl (Basingstoke, 2015), 100–20Google Scholar.

17 Ehrman, John, The Navy in the War of William III: Its State and Direction (Cambridge, 1953), 122–24, 596–601 Google Scholar; Land, Isaac, War, Nationalism and the British Sailor, 1750–1850 (New York, 2009), 7–10, 17–20, 67–70 Google Scholar; Rodgers, Nicholas, The Press Gang: Naval Impressment and Its Opponents in Georgian Britain (London, 2007)Google Scholar; Brunsman, Denver, The Evil Necessity: British Naval Impressment in the Eighteenth Century Atlantic World (Charlottesville, 2013)Google Scholar; Dancy, J. R., The Myth of the Press Gang: Volunteers, Impressment and the Naval Manpower Problem in the Late Eighteenth Century (Woodbridge, 2015)Google Scholar.

18 Rodger, N. A. M., The Wooden World: An Anatomy of the Georgian Navy (New York, 1986)Google Scholar; Lincoln, Margaret, Representing the Royal Navy: British Sea Power, 1750–1815 (Farnham, 2002)Google Scholar; Rogers, Nicholas, Mayhem: Post-War Crime and Violence in Britain, 1748–53 (New Haven, 2012), 35–87 Google Scholar.

19 Baugh, Daniel, ed., Naval Administration, 1715–1750 (London, 1977), xxiiGoogle Scholar; idem, “The Eighteenth-Century Navy as a National Institution, 1690–1815,” in The Oxford Illustrated History of the Royal Navy, ed. Hill, J. R. (New York, 1995), 120–61, at 133Google Scholar.

20 Propositions for Gaining and Encouraging Seamen in His Majesty's Service, Wing P3779A [1689], 2; “Proposal for manning the fleet” [1690], ADL/J/5, NMM.

21 Andrew Douglas, Dover Downs, to Admiralty commissioner Richard Rich, 29 November 1694, Rich Papers, X.d. 451 (126), FSL.

22 Richard Gibson, “Comparison of Doctor Richard Lower his proposal for better cureing all sick and wounded seamen put a shore out of their Maj. fleet with the present management of it under the Commissioners,” 9 December 1690, BL Add. MSS. 11602, fol. 7; “Memorial for the king about the fleet, flag officers, admiralty, navy board, victuallying and sick and wounded commissioners,” 5 October 1693, BL Add. MSS. 11602, fol. 234v.

23 The National Archives (hereafter TNA), ADM 1/3593, Navy Board to Admiralty, 3 March 1703; TNA, ADM 99/2, “The Mischiefs of the Town Quarters,” 20 September 1703.

24 Neufeld, Matthew and Wickham, Blaine, “The State, the People and the Care of Sick and Injured Sailors in Late Stuart England,” Social History of Medicine 28, no. 1 (2015): 45–63Google Scholar; Shepard, Alexandra, “From Anxious Patriarchs to Refined Gentlemen? Manhood in Britain, circa 1500–1700,” Journal of British Studies 44, no. 2 (April 2005): 281–95, at 289Google Scholar.

25 TNA, ADM 1/3588, Navy Board report to Admiralty on G. Richardson and J. Dennis petitions viz Qs and Rs, 24 January 1700; TNA, ADM 106/486/15, G. Clement to Navy Board, 6 July 1696; England and Wales, Royal Navy, Rules and Directions … in Order to the returning to their Majesties Service such Men as shall be put on Shore, Sick or Hurt, from their Majesties Ships (21 March 1691), 2, BrBsides Bv6, Beinecke Rare Book and Manuscript Library, Yale University.

26 Wilcox, Martin, “The ‘Mystery and Business’ of Navy Agents,” International Journal of Maritime History 23, no. 2 (December 2011): 41–68 Google Scholar.

27 TNA, ADM 2/171, Admiralty to Navy Board, 21 March 1691; TNA, ADM 106/486/234 and 235, Thomas Gibb to Navy Board, January 1696; TNA, ADM 3/15, Admiralty Meeting Minutes, 25 January 1700.

28 TNA, ADM 106/485/262, William Hasby to Navy Board, April 1696.

29 Hunt, Margaret, “Women and the Fiscal-Imperial State in the Late Seventeenth and Early Eighteenth Centuries,” in A New Imperial History: Culture, Identity and Modernity in Britain and the Empire, ed. Wilson, Kathleen (Cambridge, 2004), 29–47 Google Scholar.

30 Ehrman, Navy in the War, 128.

31 Hoppit, Julian, “Patterns of Parliamentary Legislation, 1660–1800,” Historical Journal 39, no. 1 (March 1996): 109–31Google Scholar; Knights, Mark, Representation and Misrepresentation in Later Stuart Britain: Partisanship and Political Culture (Oxford, 2005), 109–14Google Scholar.

32 William Hodges, An humble representation of the seamens misery, Wing H2331 (1695); TNA, ADM 3/11, 25 March and 3 April 1695; William Hodges, Great Britain's groans: or, An account of the oppression, ruin and destruction of the loyal seamen, Wing H2327 (1695), 24, 3, 7.

33 William Hodges, Humble proposals for the relief, encouragement … of loyal, couragious seamen, Wing H2329 (1695, dated 1696 February), 15, 20.

34 Robert Crosfeild, Justice perverted, and innocence & loyalty oppressed, Wing C7245 (1695), 16. For Crosfeild's career, see Knights, Mark, “Parliament, Print and Corruption in Later Stuart Britain,” Parliamentary History 26, no. 1 (February 2007): 49–61 Google Scholar.

35 John Dennis, The seamens case with respest [sic] to their service in the navy, Wing D1043 [1698/1699], 1.

36 Reasons offe'ed to the Honourable House of Commons for a clause to encourage seamen, BL Printed, 816.m7.74 [1699].

37 The general remonstrance or declaration of the sea-men, Wing G508 (1642); The seamans protestation, Wing S2191 (1642); To the Commons assembled in Parliament: the petition of the mariners, BL Printed, 816.m.148 (1642); The humble petition of the young-men, apprentices, and sea-men, Wing T1638 (1642); Humble tender and declaration of many well-affected mariners… of the Trinity House, BL, Thomason Tracts 669, fol. 12[51] (1648); A declaration and remonstrances of the sea-men and mariners, Wing D549 (1653); To his Highness … the humble petition of the sea-men, Wing T1369 (1654).

38 TNA, ADM 3/11, Admiralty Meeting Minutes, 19 February 1695; Journal of the House of Lords, vol. 14, 1685–1691 (hereafter LJ 14), (Burlington, ON, 2012–15), 450, 454; John Dennis submitted a complaint about the Qs and Rs to the Admiralty in February 1699, 22 January 1700, SER/84/25, NMM; Historical Manuscripts Commission, House of Lords Manuscripts, n.s. (hereafter HoL MSS, n.s.), 3:423; Journal of the House of Lords, vol. 16, 1696–1701 (hereafter LJ 16), 450, 454, 25 April 1699; Journal of the House of Commons, vol. 13, 1699–1702 (hereafter CJ 13), (Burlington, ON, 2011–15), 72, 18 December 1699; CJ 13:124, 16 January 1700; John Dennis, The seamens case with respest to their service in the navy, Wing D1043 (1698/1699); William Hodges, Ruin to ruin, after misery to misery, Wing H2332 (1699/1700); John Dennis, Some reasons humbly offered to the Honourable House of Commons, to hear the petitioner John Dennis, when the report of Q's and R's shall be read, Wing D1044 (1699/1700); G. B., The case of several thousands … mariners in the English Navy … kept out of their pay upon the account of Q's and R's, Wing C988A (1699); Some Further Reasons Humbly Offered … For Taking Off the Qs and Rs, Wing S4507B (1699); William Eccles, Reasons for taking off the Q---s and R---s, Wing E131 (1700); TNA, ADM 1/3588, Petition to House of Commons from Weymouth and Melcomb Regis, Dorset, 23 January 1700; CJ 13:137; Seamen's Widows’ Petition to the House of Commons, CJ 13:163, 1 February 1700; John Tutchin, Remarks on the present condition of the Navy, Wing R935 (1700); idem, Observations on a pamphlet touching the present condition of the navy and victualling … and on what he writes touching Q's and R's, Wing O101 (London, 1700)Google Scholar; idem, Remarks upon the navy. The second part, Wing R949A (London, 1700)Google Scholar; Dennis, John, An essay on the navy (London, 1702)Google Scholar; Rowe, Peter, A true method, I. For raising souldiers. II. For bringing those seamen that are in the land, into the Navy (London, 1703)Google Scholar; The old and true way of manning the fleet (London, 1707)Google Scholar.

39 HoL MSS, n.s., 3:423, 25 April 1699; Petition from George Richardson “and several Thousand Mariners belonging to His Majesty's navy” against the Q and R, CJ 13:72, 18 December 1699; Eccles, Reasons for taking off.

40 Hodges, Ruin to ruin, 25–26.

41 G. B., The case of several thousands … mariners, n.p.; Dennis, Essay on the navy, 7, 16, 30.

42 CJ 13:788, 15 April 1697.

43 Tutchin, Remarks upon the navy, sig. A2v, 20; idem, Remarks upon the navy. The second part, 28–30; Some further reasons humbly offered by the sailors to the consideration of the Honourable House of Commons for taking off the Qs and Rs, BL Printed, 816.m7.83 (1699).

44 Old and true way, 17.

45 Ibid., 4, 28–29.

46 TNA, ADM 2/179, fols. 162, 182, 234, 260, Admiralty to Navy Board, January to May 1699; LJ 16:462–63, 4 May 1699.

47 Aldridge, David, “Admiral Edward Russell, Pre- and Post-Barfleur,” in Guerres Maritimes, 1688–1713: IVes Journées Franco-Britanniques; Histoire de la Marine, Portsmouth 1er–4 Avril 1992, ed. Service Historique de la Marine (Vincennes, 1996): 155–71, at 157Google Scholar; Rodger, Command of the Ocean, 183–85; TNA, ADM 2/180, Admiralty to Navy Board, 21 July 1699.

48 TNA, ADM 1/3588, Navy Board report to the Admiralty on G. Richardson and J. Dennis petitions against Qs and Rs, 24 January 1700; CJ 13:164–65, 1 February 1700; Pool, Bernard, Navy Board Contracts, 1660–1832: Contract Administration under the Navy Board (London, 1969), 46 Google Scholar; Jones, D. W., War and Economy in the Age of William III and Marlborough (Oxford, 1988), 11, 20–24 Google Scholar.

49 Ehrman, Navy in the War, 132, 489–90.

50 Observations on a pamphlet touching the present condition of the navy and victualling, 16, 12.

51 Admiralty to Sick and Wounded, 3 June 1703, ADM/E/1, NMM; Admiralty to Sick and Wounded, 16 November 1703, ADM/E/1, NMM; TNA, ADM 1/3604, Navy Board to Admiralty, 14 February 1706; Johnston, “Parliament and the Navy,” 456–57; Kathleen Harland, “The Establishment and Administration of the First Hospitals in the Royal Navy,” (PhD diss., University of Exeter, 2003), 172–87.

52 Scammell, G. V., “Manning the English Merchant Service in the Sixteenth Century,” Mariner's Mirror 56, no. 2 (May 1970): 131–54Google Scholar, at 135; McCormick, “Population,” 28.

53 Sir Dudley Digges, The defence of trade, STC 6845 (1615), 6, 11, 32; Thomas Mun, A discourse of trade, from England vnto the East Indies, STC 18256 (1621), 33, 36; Edward Misselden, Free trade, or, The meanes to make trade florish, STC 17986 (1622), sig. A3v, 35, 75–76; Gerard Malynes, The maintenance of free trade, STC 17226 (1622), 29, 42; Henry Robinson, England's safety, in trades encrease, Wing R1671 (1641), 13.

54 William Petty, Political arithmetik, or, A discourse concerning, the extent and value of lands, people, buildings; husbandry, manufacture, commerce, fishery, artizans, seamen, soldiers … , Wing P1932 (1690), 48–49.

55 Sir Francis Brewster, Essays on trade and navigation, Wing B4434 (1695), 4, 83–84; Propositions for Gaining and Encouraging Seamen in His Majesty's Service, 2–3; “Proposal for Manning the Fleet,” [1690?], ADL/J/5, NMM.

56 Bromley, J. S. and Ryan, A. N., “Navies,” in The New Cambridge Modern History, vol. 6, The Rise of Great Britain and Russia, 1688–1715/25, ed. Bromley, J. S. (Cambridge, 1971): 790–833, at 820Google Scholar.

57 Le Goff, T. J. A., “Problèmes de recrutement de la marine français pendant la Guerre Sept Ans,” Revue Historique 283, no. 2 (April–June1990): 205–33Google Scholar.

58 Symcox, Geoffrey, The Crisis of French Sea Power, 1688–1697: From the Guerre d'Escadre to the Guerre de Course (The Hague, 1974), 15 Google Scholar; Dessert, Daniel, La Royale: Vaisseaux et Marins du Roi-Soleil (Paris, 1996), 217–18Google Scholar; Hughes, Gillian, “The Act for the Increase and Encouragement of Seamen, 1696–1710. Could it have solved the Royal Navy's Manning Problem?” in Guerres Maritimes, 1688–1714, ed. Le Fevre, P. (Vincennes, 1996), 25–33 Google Scholar.

59 Journal of the House of Commons, vol. 10, 1688–1693 (hereafter CJ 10), 442, 542, 635, 731, 734, 735; George St. Lo, England's interest: or, A discipline for seamen, Wing S340 (1694), 29.

60 George St. Lo, England's safety, or A bridle to the French king. Proposing a sure method for encouraging navigation, and raising qualified seamen, Wing S341 (1693), sig. A2, 27, 35; idem, England's interest, 40.

61 John Perry, A regulation for seamen wherein a method is humbly proposed: whereby their majesties fleet may at all times be speedily and effectually mann'd, Wing P1649 (1695), 25–26.

62 “Proposals for manning a squadron of ships, or the whole royal navy,” n.d., Rich Papers, X. d. 451 (97), FSL.

63 R. Crosfeild, England's glory reviv'd, demonstrated in several propositions, Wing C7243 (1693), sig. C2r, 7, 15.

64 George St. Lo, To [the] Parliament … for bringing down … the rates of seamen's wages, BL Printed, 816.m7.51 (1694); Crosfeild, England's Glory, sig. D3r.

65 Proposals to encrease seamen for the service and defence of England, Wing P3769D (1694).

66 George Everett, Encouragement for seamen and mariners, Wing E3546 (1695), 12, 19, 9.

67 Perry, Regulation, sig. B2. Cf. Propositions for gaining and encouraging sea-men in his Majesty's service, Wing P3779A [1689], 2.

68 Everett, Encouragement, 8.

69 See Pepys's jaundiced comments, c. December 1692–January 1693, in Samuel Pepys's Naval Minutes, ed. Tanner, J. R. (London, 1926), 267–68Google Scholar. See also CJ 10:735.

70 Journal of the House of Commons, vol. 11, 1693–1697 (hereafter CJ 11), 171, 12 November 1694; TNA, T1/134, Admiralty Secretary Bridgeman to Treasury Secretary Lowndes, 16 August 1695; TNA, ADM 3/12, Admiralty Meeting Minutes, 15 September 1695.

71 TNA, ADM 1/3573, Navy Board to Admiralty, 3 December 1694; Edward Russell to Admiralty, 18 April 1695, Landsdowne MS 1152B, fol. 272, British Library.

72 CJ 11:264, 274, 293, 296, 303, 305; Johnston, “Parliament and the Navy,” 353; CJ 11:339, 26 November 1695; Historical Manuscripts Commission, Report on the Manuscripts of the Duke of Buccleuch and Queensberry, vol. 2, The Shrewsbury Papers (London, 1889), 274–75, 289–91Google Scholar; Horwitz, Henry, Parliament, Policy and Politics in the Reign of William III (Manchester, 1977), 161, 207Google Scholar.

73 CJ 11:373, 380, 387; “Richard Onslow (1654–1717)” in History of Parliament, The House of Commons, 1690–1715, ed. Hayton, D. W. (New York, 2002), 5:25–27Google Scholar; “Sir Rowland Gwynne (1659–1726)” in History of Parliament, The House of Commons, 1690–1715, ed. Hayton, D. W. (New York, 2002), 4:142Google Scholar; CJ 11:488; LJ 14:720; Navy Board to Admiralty, 24 January 1696, SER/102, 275–78, NMM.

74 7–8 William III, cap. xxi, “Register Bill,” Statues of the Realm (hereafter SR), 7:98–102, 10 April 1696; Stevenson, Christine, “From Palace to Hut: The Architecture of Military and Naval Medicine,” in British Military and Naval Medicine: 1600–1830, ed. Hudson, Geoffrey L. (New York, 2007), 227–51Google Scholar

75 TNA, ADM 1/3997, Register Office Letters to Admiralty; TNA, ADM 105/41, Register Office Meeting Minutes; Admiralty Board Instructions to the Commissioners of the Seamen's Register, 3 September 1696, CAD/B/10, NMM.

76 TNA, ADM 1/3997, Register Office to Admiralty, 27 January 1697, 29 September 1696, 8 August 1696.

77 TNA, ADM 1/3997, Register Office to Admiralty, 18 December 1696, 18 January 1697.

78 TNA, ADM 7/344, 64, Admiralty Memorial, 18 May 1697.

79 TNA, ADM 1/3997, Register Office to Admiralty, 8 February 1697; LJ 16:16, 152; 8–9 William III, cap. xxiii, “Act to enforce the Act for the Encrease and Encouragement of Seamen,” SR, 8:257–59, April 1697.

80 “William III: March 1698,” in Calendar of State Papers Domestic: William III, 1698, ed. Bateson, Edward (London, 1933), 118–72, at 129Google Scholar, reprinted at British History Online, http://www.british-history.ac.uk/cal-state-papers/domestic/will-mary/1698/pp118-172; “Report of proceedings in Parliament. House of Commons, 3 March 1698,” Journal of the House of Commons, vol. 12, 1697–1699, 152, 10 March 1698; Thomas Morin and Nicholas Jennings, A proposal for the incouragement of seamen, Wing M2767 (1697), sig. A1v.

81 TNA, BT/167/23, fols. 1–3, C. Langress to Anthony Hammond, The Registry in the Reign of William III; TNA, ADM 1/3997, Register Office to Admiralty, 18 April 1698, 7 March 1698.

82 CJ 13:131, 19 January 1700; The case of several register'd seamen, and their widows and children, Wing C1156 (1700); Journal of the House of Commons, vol. 14, 1702–1705 (hereafter CJ 14), 68, 4 December 1702; CJ 14:102; Admiralty report to the House of Commons on the Registry Office, 4 January 1703, BL Add. MSS. 5439, fol. 165; TNA, BT/167/23, Benjamin Tymewell and Anthony Hammond, “Answer to House of Commons concerning the number of registered seamen,” 1 December 1703, fol. 27.

83 Hodges, Ruin to ruin, 29. See also Dennis, Essay on the navy, 37–38.

84 Speke, Hugh, Some considerations … laid before the honorable House of Commons, concerning the Admiralty and the Commissioners of the Navy, Wing S4914B (London, 1700)Google Scholar; Registered seamen petition the Commons for bounty money, Journal of the House of Commons, vol. 16, 1708–1711 (hereafter CJ 16), 96, 8 February 1709.

85 TNA, PC 2/77, Privy Council Meeting Minutes, 12 May 1698, fol. 90; TNA, ADM 1/5249, Privy Council to Admiralty, 12 May 1698; TNA, PC 2/77, 9 June 1698, fol. 93; TNA, ADM 1/5249, Privy Council to Admiralty, 23 June 1698.

86 TNA, ADM 99/1, Sick and Wounded Commission Meeting Minutes, 17 June 1698; TNA, ADM 2/180, Admiralty to Navy Board, 7 July 1699, fol. 47; Navy Board to Admiralty, 12 July 1699, SER/104, 170–171, NMM; TNA, ADM 105/41, Register Office Meeting Minutes, 21 July 1699, final entry on 18 December 1699.

87 CJ 13:368; TNA, ADM 2/180, Admiralty to Navy Board, 16 and 21 July 1699, fols. 56–57; “A catalogue of men employed in the Sick and Wounded service,” July 1698, BL Add. MSS. 28748, fols. 21–23. John Hill and Benjamin Timewell listed as “naval commissioners in general” in Chamberlayne, Edward, Angliae Notitia, or, The present state of England, Wing C1836 (London, 1700), 549 Google Scholar.

88 TNA, ADM 1/3997, Register Office Memorandum to the Admiralty, 2 January 1699; Dennis, Essay on the navy, 39–40, 47; CJ 14:211, 9 November 1703.

89 C. W., Tack About: or, A new model of a Marine establishment, for raising seamen (London, 1703), 8 Google Scholar.

90 Peter Rowe, True method, 6; Defoe, Daniel, Essays upon several projects: or, effectual ways for advancing the interest of the nation (London, 1702), 313–14Google Scholar; Daniel Defoe, proposals for manning the fleet presented to the House of Lords, HMC, HoL MSS, n.s., 6:223–25, 10 February 1705; Justice, Alexander, A general treatise of the dominion and laws of the sea (London, 1705), 648, 646Google Scholar.

91 TNA, ADM 1/3997, Register Office to Admiralty, 2 January 1699.

92 C. W., Tack About, 8, 16, 14.

93 J. Swanne, A proposal to man the Navy Royal of Great Britain (1709), 2, 6.

94 Old and True Way, 20.

95 Discussion of parliamentary committee on manning the navy, 4 December 1703, SER/103, 444, NMM.

96 CJ 14:240, 249–50, 284; HoL MSS, n.s., 1702–1704, 5:536–44; Journal of the House of Lords, vol. 17, 1701–1705, 421–22, 535; Journal of the House of Lords, vol. 18, 1705–1709, 161, 426, 432; HoL MSS, n.s., 6:524–37, 434–35; Journal of the House of Commons, vol. 15, 1705–1708, 515, 526.

97 2–3 Anne, part 2. no. 3 cap. vi, “Act for Encrease of Seamen and Encouragement of Navigation,” SR, 8:258–61, March 1704; CJ 14:249–50.

98 Johnston, “Parliament and the Navy,” 391, 398, 417. Cf. Bromley, J. S., “Away from Impressment: The Idea of a Royal Navy Reserve, 1696–1859,” in Britain and the Netherlands, vol. 6, War and Society, ed. Duke, A. D. and Tamse, C. A. (The Hague, 1977), 168–88, at 185Google Scholar.

99 Discussion of parliamentary committee on manning the navy, 27 November 1703, SER/103, 451–52, NMM; Discussion on 4 December 1703, SER/103, 454–55, NMM.

100 Discussions of parliamentary committee on manning the navy, 27 November and 4 December 1703, SER/103, 451, 454, 456, NMM; Holmes, Geoffrey, British Politics in the Age of Anne, rev. ed. (London, 1987), 275–76Google Scholar. The debt on the bounty in October 1704 was £185,414. CJ 14:400; Order to inspect the registry, CJ 16:28, 29; CJ 16:491, 12 February 1710; 9 Anne cap. xv, “An Act for making good Deficiencies and satisfying the public Debts,” clause lxx, SR, 9:446.

101 TNA, ADM 105/41, Registry Office Meeting Minutes, 5 May 1696; Journal of the House of Commons, vol. 19, 1718–1722, 301, 359, 364, 365; TNA, ADM 3/32, Admiralty Meeting Minutes, 14 March 1720.

102 Orlebar, John, A scheme whereby His Majesty would never want a choice of able seamen on any occasion, and at the same time save the great charge and trouble of impressing (London, [1720])Google Scholar.

103 Admiral Sir John Norris, Journal, BL Add. MSS 28132, fols. 44–46, 25 September 1739; HoL MSS, n.s., 6:525.

104 Debate in the House of Commons over a bill for registering seamen, 5 February 1740, in Parliamentary History of England, 1739–1741, ed. Cobbett, William (London, 1812), 11:428Google Scholar.

105 Cobbett, ed., Parliamentary History, 11:430.

106 Journal of the House of Commons, vol. 28, 1757–1761, 46, 249–50, 374, 390, 510, 516; Cobbett, ed., Parliamentary History 14:540–41; Pares, R., “The Manning of the Navy in the West Indies,” Transactions of the Royal Historical Society 20 (1937): 31–60 Google Scholar; Stout, Neil R., “Manning the Royal Navy in North America, 1763–1775,” American Neptune 23, no. 3 (July 1963): 174–85Google Scholar.

107 Burchett, Josiah, Memoirs of transactions at sea during the war with France; beginning in 1688 and ending in 1697 (London, 1703)Google Scholar, sigs. a1r-1v, a2r.

108 Charters, Erica, “The Caring Fiscal-Military State during the Seven Years War,” Historical Journal 52, no. 4 (December 2009): 921–41Google Scholar.

109 Bellers, John, An essay towards the improvement of physik (London, 1714), 46, 38Google Scholar.

110 Hoppit, Julian, “Political Power and British Economic Life, 1650–1870,” in The New Cambridge Economic History of Britain, ed. Floud, Roderick, Humphries, Jane, and Johnson, Paul (New York, 2014), 344–67, at 351–52Google Scholar; Pincus, Steve and Robinson, James, “Challenging the Fiscal-Military Hegemony: The British Case,” in The British Fiscal-Military States, 1660–c.1783, ed. Graham, Aaron and Walsh, Patrick (London, 2016), 229–61Google Scholar. But see Williamson, C., The British Navy and the State in the Eighteenth Century (Woodbridge, 2004), 21–30, 35–44 Google Scholar.

111 TNA, PRO 30/8/248, Navy Office papers, relating to seamen, A bill for the better regulation and government of seamen in the merchant service, and also for promoting an increase of seamen for the use of His Majesty's navy, 1795, fols. 121–67.

112 Conway, Steven, War, State and Society in Mid-Eighteenth Century Britain and Ireland (New York, 2006), 51Google Scholar; Convertito, Cori, “Mending the Sick and Wounded: The Development of Naval Hospitals in the West Indies, 1740–1800,” Canadian Journal of History 51, no. 3 (Winter 2016): 500–33Google Scholar.

113 Arnold, Dana, The Spaces of the Hospital: Spatiality and Urban Change in London, 1680–1820 (London, 2013), 2–4, 18–21 Google Scholar.

114 Hudson, Geoffrey L., “Internal Influences in the Making of the English Military Hospital: The Early-Eighteenth-Century Greenwich,” in British Military and Naval Medicine: 1600–1830, ed. Hudson, Geoffrey L. (New York, 2007), 253–72Google Scholar.

115 Blakemore, Richard J., “The Legal World of English Sailors, c. 1575–1729,” in Law, Labour and Empire: Comparative Perspectives on Seafarers, c. 1500–1800, ed. Fusaro, Maria, Allaire, Bernard, Blakemore, Richard J., and Vanneste, Tijl (Basingstoke, 2015), chap. 6Google Scholar.

116 Peacey, Jason, Print and Public Politics in the English Revolution (Cambridge, 2013)Google Scholar; Loft, Philip, “Involving the Public: Parliament, Petitioning, and the Language of Interest, 1688–1720,” Journal of British Studies 55, no. 1 (January 2016): 1–23 Google Scholar.

117 Knights, Representation and Misrepresentation, 98–99, 126.