Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-cjp7w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-18T15:55:13.097Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Parental predetermination of the sex of offspring: the attitudes of young married couples with university education

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 July 2008

Saul Rosenzweig  and
Stuart Adelman
Saul Rosenzweig
Affiliation:
Departments of Psychiatry and Psychology, Washington University, St Louis, Missouri, USA
Stuart Adelman
Affiliation:
Departments of Psychiatry and Psychology, Washington University, St Louis, Missouri, USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

An intensive pilot survey involving direct contact with 47 young married couples with university education was conducted to determone their attitudes tiwards general (public) and personal choice and control by parents of the sex of offspring. Information as to premarital family status and present number and sex of children was obained. Questionnaires were completed before and after information had provided regarding new methods of fetal sex detemination, abortion, and related topics. Opportunity for discussion by husband and wife between sessions was allowed, but discussion with other was discouraged. Results indicate that sex choice will be accepted and employed by the majority of highly educated, middle-class individuals. While selection of the first-child sex is of negligible importance to most, planning for a second child with opposite sex to the first is strongly favoured. The tendency to prefer males is not as pronounced as reported in previous, less direct studies. The majority preferred a two-child family with one child of each sex. Prospective methods (e.g. a pre-coital, sex-selective pill, when available) were much preferred to retrospective methods involving abortion. Inthe meantime, fetal sex determination in the first trimester of pregnancy with selective abortion may soon be widely practised. New problems in marital and family adjustment, family planning, and social organization may arise with the advent of this new step in human sexual socio-econtingencies need further onvestigation at various socia-economic and educational levels and in different cultural milieus.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Biosocial Science , Volume 8 , Issue 4 , October 1976 , pp. 335 - 346
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1976

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abdul-Karim, R. & Iliya, F. (1961) Antepartal diagnosis of sex. J. méd. liban. 14, 410.Google Scholar
Cederovist, L.L. & Fuchs, F. (1970) Antenatal sex determination: a historical review. Clin. Obstat. Gynec. 13, 159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coale, A.J. (1974) The history of human population. Scient. Am. 231, 40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dahlberg, G. (1948) Do parents want boys or girls? Acta genet. Statist. med. 1, 163.Google ScholarPubMed
Freedman, D.S., Freedman, R. & Whelpton, P.K. (1960) Size of family and preference for children of each sex. Am. J. Sociol. 66, 141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gini, C. (1951) Combinations and sequences of sexes in human families and mammal litters. Acta genet. Statist. med. 2, 220.Google ScholarPubMed
Jones, R.J. (1973) Sex predetemination and sex ratio at birth. Soc. Biol. 20, 303.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Markle, G.E. (1974) Sex ratio at birth: values, variance, and some determinants. Demography, 11, 131.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Markle, G.E. & Nam, C.B. (1971) Sex predetermination: its impact on family. Soc. Biol. 18, 73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osgood, C.E. & Suci, G.J.A. (1952) A mesure of relation determined difference and profile information. Psychol. Bull. 49, 251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pincher, C. (1973) Sex in Our Time. Weidenfeld and Nicolson, London.Google Scholar
Pohlman, E. & Pohlman, J.M. (1969) The Psychology of Birth Planning. Schenkman, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
Rosenzweig, S. (1973) Human sexual autonomy as an evolutionary attainment, p. 189. In: Contemporary Sexual Behavior: Critical Issues in the 1970s. Edited by Zubin, J. & Money, J.. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.Google Scholar
Shettles, L.B. (1961) Conception and birth sex ratios. Obstet. Gynec. 18, 122.Google Scholar
Shettles, L.B. (1970) Factors influencing sex ratios. Int. J. Gynec. Obstet. 8, 643.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tietung Hospital of Ashan Iron and Steel Company (Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, People ’s Repulblic of China) (1975) Fetal sex prediction by sex chromatin of chorionic villi cells during early pregnancy. Chinese med. J. 1, 117.Google Scholar
Valenti, C., Lin, C.C., Baum, A., Massobrio, M. & Carbonara, A. (1972) Prenatal sex determination. Am. J. Obstet. Gynec. 112, 890.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Westoff, C.F. (1974) The populations of the developed countries. Scient. Am. 231, 108.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Westoff, C.F. & Rindfuss, R.R. (1974) Sex preseletion in the United States: some implications. Science, N. Y. 184, 633.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Winston, S. (1932) Birth control and sex ratio at birth. Am. J. Social. 38, 225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar