Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-m9pkr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-11T01:32:26.692Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Migration and fertility behaviour in England and Wales: a record linkage study*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 July 2008

Emily Grundy
Affiliation:
Social Statistics Research Unit, City University, Northampton Square, London

Summary

Relationships between migration and fertility are examined, using data from the OPCS Longitudinal Study of England and Wales, including linked information from the 1971 and 1981 Censuses and birth registration data for the period 1971–80. The results showed that the proportion moving between the 1971 Census and the first subsequent birth was higher among tenants than owner occupiers, particularly for women in shared accommodation in 1971. The association between tenure and moving was more consistent than the relationship between moving and the husband's social class. Differences in the proportions moving between the censuses were positively associated with fertility in the same period particularly for women in potentially crowded accommodation in 1971. Moving in 1970–71 was not associated with differences in parity progression ratios 1971–81. There were, however, differences in the timing of births, suggesting that long distance migration was associated with a postponement of the first or second child, probably because both longer distance migration and fertility behaviour are associated with other characteristics such as education.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Andorka, R.A. (1978) Determinants of Fertility in Advanced Societies. Methuen, London.Google Scholar
Brant, J. (1984) Patterns of migration from the 1981 census. Popul. Trends, 35, 23.Google Scholar
Chevan, A. (1971) Family growth, household density and moving. Demography, 8, 451.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clark, W. & Huff, J. (1977) Some empirical tests of duration-of-stay effects in intra-urban migration. Environment and Planning, A9, 1357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, W.A.V., Deurloo, M.S. & Dieleman, F.M. (1984) Housing consumption and residential mobility. Ann. Ass. Am. Geogr. 74, 29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Courgeau, D. (1984) Relations entre cycle de vie et migrations. Population, 39, 483.Google Scholar
Farber, S.C. & Lee, B.S. (1984) Fertility adaptation of rural to urban migrant women: a method of estimation applied to Korean women. Demography, 21, 339.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Friedlander, D. & Roshier, R.J. (1966) A study of internal migration in England and Wales: Part II, recent migrants—their movement and characteristics. Popul. Stud. 20, 45.Google Scholar
Ginsberg, R.B. (1971) Semi-Markov processes and mobility. J. mathemat. Sociol. 1, 233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodsell, W. (1937) Housing and the birthrate in Sweden. Am. Sociol. Rev. 2, 850.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grundy, E. (1985) Divorce, widowhood, remarriage and geographic mobility. J. biosoc. Sci. 17, 415.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grundy, E. & Fox, A.J. (1984) Changes of address in the early years of marriage. Popul. Trends, 38, 25.Google Scholar
Grundy, E.M.D. & Fox, A.J. (1985) Migration during early married life. Eur. J. Popul. 1, 237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hart, R.A. (1973) Economic expectations and the decision to migrate: an analysis by socio-economic group. Regional Stud. 7, 271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holm, C.F. (1984) Housing aspirations and fertility. Sociol. Social Res. 68, 351.Google Scholar
Holmans, A.E. (1981) Housing careers of recently married couples. Popul. Trends, 24, 10.Google Scholar
Ineichen, B. (1981) The housing decisions of young people. Br. J. Sociol. 32, 252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kendig, H.L. (1984) Housing careers, life cycle and residential mobility: implications for the housing market. Urban Stud. 21, 271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kiernan, K. (1977) Young people who move interregionally. In: Regional Demographic Development, pp. 211227. Edited by Hobcraft, J. and Rees, P.Croom Helm, London.Google Scholar
Kiser, C.V. (1959) Fertility rates by residence and migration. In: Proceedings of the International Population Conference, Vienna, pp. 273286. IUSSP, Liège.Google Scholar
McCarthy, K.F. (1976) The household life cycle and housing choices. Pap. Reg. Sci. Ass. 37, 55.Google Scholar
McCullagh, P. & Nelder, J.A. (1983) General Linear Models. Chapman and Hall, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLeod, P.B. & Ellis, J.R. (1982) Housing consumption over the life cycle: an empirical analysis. Urban Stud. 19, 177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mascie-Taylor, C.G.N. (1984) The interaction between geographical and social mobility, pp. 161178. In: Migration and Mobility. Edited by Boyce, A. J.Taylor and Francis, London.Google Scholar
Madge, J. & Brown, C. (1981) First Homes: a Survey of the Housing Circumstances of Young Married Couples. No. 600, Policy Studies Institute, London.Google Scholar
Morris, E.W. (1977) Mobility, fertility and residential crowding. Sociol. Social Res. 61, 363.Google Scholar
Morrison, P. (1967) Duration of residence and prospective migration: the evaluation of a stochastic model. Demography, 4, 553.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rossi, P.H. (1955) Why Families Move. Free Press, Glencoe, Illinois.Google Scholar
Sullivan, O. & Murphy, M.J. (1984) Housing pathways and stratification: some evidence from a British national survey. J. Social Policy, 13, 147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, J. & Britton, M. (1980) Some socio-economic differentials in fertility in England and Wales. In: Demographic patterns in Developed Societies, pp. 113. Edited by Hiorns, R. W.Taylor and Francis, London.Google Scholar
Thompson, W. F. (1938) The effect of housing upon population growth. Millbank meml Fund Q. Bull. 16, 359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Werner, B. (1984) Fertility and family background: some illustrations from the OPCS Longitudinal Study. Popul. Trends, 35, 5.Google Scholar
Zarate, A. & Zarate, A.U. (1975) On the reconciliation of research findings of migrant and non migrant fertility differentials in urban areas. Int. migr. Rev. 9, 115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar