Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-skm99 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T17:16:19.396Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Covariates of age at first birth in Guyana: a hazards model analysis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 July 2008

K. Vaninadha Rao
Affiliation:
Department of Sociology, University of Western Ontario, London, Canada
Komanduri S. Murty
Affiliation:
Department of Criminal Justice, Atlanta University, Georgia, USA

Summary

Analysis of data from the Guyana Fertility Survey on the trends and covariates of age at first birth among various birth cohorts of women ever in union indicates that an early entry into union is associated with young age at first birth and higher number of children born. Multivariate analysis showed that women with highér education, urban residence, and entry into union at age 20 or older among younger cohorts experienced lower risks for first birth compared to others, and that young women are delaying their first birth for longer durations than older women. Work status of women before first birth and the starting age of union seem to be the two major contributory factors for age at first birth. Noticeably, the role of education has changed and is now more significant among younger cohorts than among older ones for first birth timing.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Breslow, N. E. (1974) Covariance analysis of censored survival data. Biometrics, 30, 89.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bumpass, L. L. & Sweet, J. A. (1972) Differentials in marital instability. Am. sociol. Rev. 37, 754.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, A. A. (1968) The role of family planning in the reduction of poverty. J. Marr. & Fam. 30, 236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coale, A. J. & Tye, C. Y. (1961) The significance of age patterns of fertility in higher fertility populations. Milbank meml Fund Q. Bull. 34, 631.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coombs, L. C. & Freedman, R. (1966) Child spacing and family economic position. Am. sociol. Rev. 31, 631.Google Scholar
Cox, D. R. (1972) Regression models and life tables. J. Roy. Statist. Soc. 184.Google Scholar
Ford, K. (1984) Timing and Spacing of Births. Comparative Studies 38, World Fertility Survey, London.Google Scholar
Guyana Statistical Bureau (1980) Guyana Fertility Survey 1975: Country Report, Vol. 1. Ministry of Economic Development, Georgetown.Google Scholar
Harewood, J. (1984) Mating and Fertility: Results from Three WFS Surveys in Guyana, Jamaica and Trinidad and Tobago. WFS Scientific Reports 67, World Fertility Survey, London.Google Scholar
Holford, T. R. (1976) Life tables with concomitant information. Biometrics, 32, 587.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kalbfleisch, J. & Prentice, R. (1980) The Statistical Analysis of Failure Time Data. Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
Lagakos, S. W. (1981) The graphical evaluation of explanatory variables in proportional hazards regression models. Biometrics, 68, 93.Google Scholar
Martin, L. G., Trussell, J., Salvail, F. R. & Shah, N. M. (1983) Co-variates of child mortality in the Philippines, Indonesia, and Pakistan: an analysis based on hazard models. Popul. Stud. 37, 417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Menken, J., Trussell, J., Stempel, D. & Babakol, O. (1981) Proportional hazards life table models: an illustrative analysis of socio-demographic influences on marriage dissolution in the United States. Demography, 18, 181.Google Scholar
Population Reference Bureau (1986) World Population Data Sheet, 1986. Population Reference Bureau, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Prentice, R. L. & Kalbfleisch, J. D. (1979) Hazard rate models with covariates. Biometrics, 35, 25.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Presser, H. (1977) Social consequences of teenage childbearing. In: Social Demography: The State of the Art. Edited by Petersen, W. & Day, L., Harvard University Press, Harvard.Google Scholar
Richards, T. (1983) Comparative Analysis of Fertility, Breast-feeding, and Contraception: A Dynamic Model. Report No. 22, Panel on Fertility Determinants. National Academy of Sciences. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Rodriguez, G., Hobcraft, J., McDonald, J., Menken, J. & Trussell, J. (1984) A Comparative Analysis of Determinants of Birth Intervals. Comparative Studies No. 30. World Fertility Survey. London.Google Scholar
Sandefur, G. D. & Scott, W. (1981) A dynamic analysis of migration: an assessment of the effects of age, family and career variables. Demography, 18, 355.Google Scholar
Schirm, A., Menken, J., Trussell, J. & Grady, W. (1982) Contraceptive failure in the United States: the impact of social, economic and demographic factors. Fam. Plann. Perspect. 14, 68.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Singh, S. (1979) Demographic variables and the recent trend in fertility in Guyana, 1961–71. Popul. Stud. 33, 313.Google Scholar
Singh, S. (1984) Guyana, Jamaica and Trinidad and Tobago: Socioeconomic Differentials in Cumulative Fertility. Scientific Report 57, World Fertility Survey, London.Google Scholar
Storer, B. E. & Crowley, J. (1985) A diagnostic for Cox regression and general conditional likelihoods. J. Am. statist. Ass. 80, 139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teachman, J. (1982) Methodological issues in the analysis of family formation and dissolution. J. Marr. & Fam. 44, 1037.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thaler, H. T. (1984) Nonparametric estimation of the hazard ratio. J. Am. statist. Ass. 79. 290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trussell, J. (1976) Economic consequence of teenage childbearing. Fam. Plann. Perspect. 6. 184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trussell, J. & Bloom, D. E. (1983) Estimating co-variates of age at marriage and first birth. Popul. Stud. 37, 403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trussell, J. & Hammerslough, C. (1983) A hazard model analysis of the covariates of infant and child mortality in Sri Lanka. Demography, 20, 1.Google Scholar