Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-cnmwb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-19T20:14:59.788Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Socio-demographic Variations in the Sex composition and Preferences of Aberdeen families

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 July 2008

R. Carr-Hill
Affiliation:
MRC Medical Sociology Unit, Institute of Medical Sociology, Westburn Road, Aberdeen
M. Samphier
Affiliation:
MRC Medical Sociology Unit, Institute of Medical Sociology, Westburn Road, Aberdeen
B. Sauve
Affiliation:
MRC Medical Sociology Unit, Institute of Medical Sociology, Westburn Road, Aberdeen

Summary

In contrast to early studies of parental preference for the sex of their offspring which showed an over-riding son preference in terms of both the expressed desires for a male infant and of the sex ratio of completed families, more recent studies show that the desire for a balance of sexes outweighs the preference for a particular sex. A recent attitude survey in the UK (Dunnell, 1979) confirms this and also claims to find no difference in the pattern of preferences between social classes.

This article examines family building patterns among Aberdeen families over the last 20 years in the light of these earlier findings. The analysis shows first that considerably more families continue to have a third child after two children of the same sex than after one boy and one girl, thus supporting the proposition that parents prefer a balanced sex composition. Second, a multivariate analysis of the data shows in contrast to other findings that this tendency to continue to have a third child does vary according to social class.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © 1982, Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adelman, S. & Rosenzweig, S. (1978) Parental predetermination of the sex of offspring: II. The attitudes of young married couples with high school and with college education. J. biosoc. Sci. 10, 235.Google Scholar
Baker, R.J. & Nelder, J.A. (1978) The GLIM System: Release 3. Numerical Algorithms Group, Oxford.Google Scholar
Central Statistical Office (1977) Social Trends. No. 8, p. 56. HM Stationery Office, London.Google Scholar
Cox, D.R. (1970) Analysis of Binary Data. Methuen, London.Google Scholar
Dunnell, K. (1979) Family Formation, 1976. Office of Population Censuses and Surveys. HM Stationery Office, London.Google Scholar
Goody, J., Duly, C.J., Beeson, I. & Harrison, G. (1981) Implicit sex preferences: a comparative study. J. biosoc. Sci. 13, 455.Google Scholar
Gray, E. & Morrison, M. (1974) Influence of combinations of sex of children on family size. J. Hered. 65, 169.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hanmer, J. (1981) Sex predetermination artificial insemination and the maintenance of male-dominated culture. In: Women, Health and Reproduction, Chapter 8. Edited by Roberts, H.Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.Google Scholar
Kendall, M.G. & Stuart, A. (1967) The Advanced Theory of Statistics, Vol. II, Inference and Relationship, 2nd edn.Griffin, London.Google Scholar
Pritchard, C. & Thompson, B. (1982) Starting a family in Aberdeen, 1961–79. J. biosoc. Sci. 14, 127.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rent, C.S. & Rent, G.S. (1977) More on offspring preference: a comment on N.E. Williamson's ‘Sex preferences, sex control and the status of women’. Signs, 3, 505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, A.M. (1978) The origins of fluctuations in human secondary sex ratio. J. biosoc. Sci. 10, 169.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Samphier, M.L. (1980) The Aberdeen Maternity Register In: Medical Records in the UK. Project Paper No. 16. Kings Fund, London.Google Scholar
Thomas, M.H. (1951) Sex patterns and size of family. Br. med. J. 1, 733.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Williamson, N.E. (1976) Sex preferences, sex control and the status of women. Signs, 1, 847.Google Scholar
Winston, S. (1932) Birth control and sex ratio at birth. Am. J. Sociol. 38, 226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar