Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-fmk2r Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-23T19:26:46.923Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Global Asias: Method, Architecture, Praxis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 January 2022

Tina Chen Open the ORCID record for Tina Chen [Opens in a new window]
Tina Chen*
Affiliation:
Tina Chen (tcg3@psu.edu) is Associate Professor of English and Asian American Studies and Director of the Global Asias Initiative at Penn State. She is also Founding Editor of the journal Verge: Studies in Global Asia.
Get access

Abstract

This essay draws on the philosophy, principles, and practices animating Global Asias scholarship to consider how this conceptual rubric shifts the ways in which we approach the subjects, objects, methods, and praxes of the academic study of Asia. Structurally dissonant as an epistemological project, Global Asias encourages scholars to acknowledge the institutional designs and disciplinary practices that currently organize and make legible work on Asia and its diasporas while simultaneously highlighting the limits of, and points of noncontact between, the broader infrastructures (including area studies, ethnic studies, diaspora studies, and the disciplines and interdisciplines) under which such work has traditionally been organized. In addition to offering a conceptual topography of Global Asias, this essay proposes three praxis-oriented concepts—relational nonalignment, structural dissonance, and imaginable ageography—that enable Global Asias as a tactical and evolving approach to the study of Asia and its multiple diasporas, one which actively resists the drive toward “critical consolidation” that often results from academic paradigm work.

Keywords

Asian studiesAsian American studiesAsian diaspora studiesGlobal Asiasinter-Asiamultidisciplinaritytransnational
Type
Forum: Global Asias
Information
The Journal of Asian Studies , Volume 80 , Issue 4 , November 2021 , pp. 997 - 1009
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Association for Asian Studies, Inc. 2022

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

List of References

Abel, Jessamyn R., and Coleman, Leo. 2020. “Dreams of Infrastructure in Global Asias.” Verge: Studies in Global Asias 6 (2): vi–xxix.Google Scholar
Bacalzo, Dan, Bender, Mark, Lee, Josephine, Starks, Charles, Thomas, Laronika, and Zhu, Ying. 2016. “An Interdisciplinary Review of Kinesthetic City: Dance and Movement in Chinese Urban Spaces by SanSan Kwan.” Verge: Studies in Global Asias 2 (1): 28–41.Google Scholar
Bachner, Andrea, Bush, Christopher, Hill, Christopher L., Hosne, Ana Carolina, Hubert, Rosario, Jacobowitz, Seth, Kunigami, André Keiji, Leong, Andrew, and Rivas, Zelideth María. 2017. “Approaches between Asia and Latin America: A Critical Renga.” Verge: Studies in Global Asias 3 (2): 55–95.Google Scholar
Chen, Kuan-Hsing, and Huat, Chua Beng, eds. 2007. The Inter-Asia Cultural Studies Reader. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Chen, Tina. 2017. “The ‘Comfort’ of Critical Consolidation: Pedagogy, Ethical Alienation, and Asian American Literary Studies.” American Literature 89 (2): 331–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, Tina. 2018. “Always Verging on the (Im)possible: The Structural Incoherence of Global Asias.” Social Text, May 14. https://socialtextjournal.org/periscope_article/always-verging-on-the-impossible-the-structural-incoherence-of-global-asias/ (accessed September 9, 2021).Google Scholar
Chen, Tina. 2020. “(The) Transpacific Turns.” Oxford Research Encyclopedias, January 30. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190201098.013.782.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, Tina. 2021. “Global Asias—On the Structural Incoherence of Imaginable Ageography.” In Asian American Literature in Transition, 1996–2020, edited by Huang, Betsy and Mendoza, Victor Román, 311–30. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, Tina, and Hayot, Eric. 2015. “Introducing Verge: What Does It Mean to Study Global Asias?” Verge: Studies in Global Asias 1 (1): vi–xv.Google Scholar
Day, Iyko, Pegues, Juliana Hu, Phung, Malissa, Saranillio, Dean Itsuji, and Medak-Saltzman, Danika. 2019. “Settler Colonial Studies, Asian Diasporic Questions.” Verge: Studies in Global Asias 5 (1): 1–45.Google Scholar
Dirlik, Arif, ed. 1998. What Is in a Rim? Critical Perspectives on the Pacific Region Idea. Lanham, Md.: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Duara, Prasenjit. 2018. “Area Studies Scholarship of Asia.” In The Routledge Handbook of Transregional Studies, edited by Middell, Matthias, 38–45. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duara, Prasenjit. 2021. “Circulatory Histories of the Nation-State.” Verge: Studies in Global Asias 7 (1): 5–12.Google Scholar
Durán, Isabel. 2020. “What is the Transnational Turn in American Literary Studies?” Atlantis: Journal of the Spanish Association of Anglo-American Studies 42 (2): 138–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Emmerson, Donald K. 2008. “Southeast Asia in Political Science: Terms of Enlistment.” In Southeast Asia in Political Science: Theory, Region, and Qualitative Analysis, edited by Kuhonta, Erik Martinez, Slater, Dan, and Vu, Tuong, 302–24. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Espiritu, Yến Lê, and Ruanto-Ramirez, J.A.. 2020. “The Philippine Refugee Processing Center: The Relational Displacements of Vietnamese Refugees and the Indigenous Aetas.” Verge: Studies in Global Asias 6 (1): 118–41.Google Scholar
Hau‘ofa, Epeli. 2008. We Are the Ocean: Selected Works. Honolulu: University of Hawai‘i Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herman, R. D. K., Huang, Yu-Ting, Saranillio, Dean Itsuji, and Suzuki, Erin. 2018. “Indigeneity at Sea.” Verge: Studies in Global Asias 4 (2): 14–53.Google Scholar
Huang, Yunte. 2008. Transpacific Imaginations: History, Literature, Counterpoetics. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, Junyoung Verónica. 2017. “Asia-Latin America as Method: The Global South Project and the Dislocation of the West.” Verge: Studies in Global Asias 3 (2): 97–117.Google Scholar
Lanza, Fabio, Wu, Judy Tzu-Chun, Kim, Nan, Schieder, Chelsea Szendi, and Claudio, Lisandro E.. 2019. “Contemporary History/Contended History.” Verge: Studies in Global Asias 5 (1): 95–121.Google Scholar
Lee, Fred, Chung, Erin Aeran, Wong, Janelle S., Kuhonta, Erik Martinez, and Fernandes, Leela. 2017. “Political Science and the Study of Global Asias.” Verge: Studies in Global Asias 3 (1): 2–25.Google Scholar
Nguyen, Viet Thanh, and Hoskins, Janet, eds. 2014. Transpacific Studies: Framing an Emerging Field. Honolulu: University of Hawai‘i Press.Google Scholar
Onaga, Lisa, and Teo, Grace. 2019. “Making Meanings: Introducing the Teach311.org Interview Collection.” Verge: Studies in Global Asias 5 (1): 46–58.Google Scholar
Roberts, Brian Russell. 2021. Borderwaters: Amid the Archipelagic States of America. Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Rojas, Carlos. 2020. “Method as Method.” Prism: Theory and Modern Chinese Literature 16 (2): 211–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Said, Edward. 1979. Orientalism. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
Sakai, Naoki. 2000. “The Dislocation of the West.” Traces: A Multilingual Journal of Cultural Theory and Translation 1:71–94.Google Scholar
Selinger, Vyjayanthi Ratnam. 2021. “The Rāmāyana and the Rhizome: Textual Networks in the Work of Minakata Kumagusu.” Verge: Studies in Global Asias 7 (1): 247–72.Google Scholar
Shigematsu, Setsu, and Camacho, Keith L., eds. 2010. Militarized Currents: Toward a Decolonized Future in Asia and the Pacific. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shu, Yuan. 2021. “New World Orders and the Geopolitics of the Transpacific.” Verge: Studies in Global Asias 7 (1): 2–20.Google Scholar
Shu, Yuan, Heim, Otto, and Johnson, Kendall. 2019. Oceanic Archives, Indigenous Epistemologies, and Transpacific American Studies. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
So, Richard Jean. 2016. Transpacific Community: America, China, and the Rise and Fall of a Cultural Network. New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spivak, Gayatri. 2007. Other Asias. New York: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Suzuki, Erin. 2014. “Transpacific.” In Routledge Companion to Asian American Literature, edited by Lee, Rachel, 352–64. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Suzuki, Erin. 2021. Ocean Passages: Navigating Pacific Islander and Asian American Literatures. Philadelphia, Pa.: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Tuck, Eve, and Wayne Yang, K.. 2012. “Decolonization Is Not a Metaphor.” Decolonization: Indigeneity, Education, & Society 1 (1): 1–40.Google Scholar
Turin, Mark. 2018. “What Next for Digital Himalaya? Reflections on Community, Continuity, and Collaboration.” Verge: Studies in Global Asias 4 (2): 57–63.Google Scholar
Wacks, David A. 2015. Double Diaspora in Sephardic Literature: Jewish Cultural Production before and after 1492. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Wilson, Rob. 2000. Reimagining the American Pacific: From South Pacific to Bamboo Ridge and Beyond. Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press.Google Scholar