Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-ndmmz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-30T18:30:56.978Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Forum on Universalism and Relativism in Asian Studies Editor's Introduction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 March 2011

Get access

Extract

How to establish and transmit understanding across the boundaries of language, geography, culture, and time lies at the very heart of Asian Studies. Ours is a highly refined form of cross-cultural activity, but one that places the highest value on this understanding. To engage in this activity, individuals undergo long periods of training to master other languages, to produce, and then to present their knowledge in certain rigorously defined forms. The scholar works in this way both to establish some particular understanding and then to transmit that understanding to other Asianists, students, various other specialists, and the public at large.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © The Association for Asian Studies, Inc. 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

List of References

Adas, Michael. 1989. Machines as the Measure of Men. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Bernstein, Richard J. 1985. Beyond Objectivism and Relativism. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Brook, Timothy. 1986. Review of Jonathan Spence, The Memory Palace of Matteo Ricci (1984), Jas 45.4 (August), pp. 831834.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, Paul A., and Goldman, Merle, eds. 1990. Ideas Across Cultures: Essays on Chinese Thought in Honor of Benjamin I. Schwartz. Cambridge: Council on East Asian Studies, Harvard University, 1990.Google Scholar
Hatch, Elvin. 1983. Culture and Morality: The Relativity of Values in Anthropology. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Hassan, Ihab. 1990. “The Burden of Mutual Perceptions: Japan and the United States.International House of Japan Bulletin 10.1, pp. 16.Google Scholar
Herskovits, Melville. 1972. Cultural Relativism: Perspectives in Cultural Pluralism. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Hollis, Martin, and Lukes, Steven, eds. 1982. Rationality and Relativism. Oxford, Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Jas. 1980. “Review Symposium: Edward Said's Orientalism.” 39.3 (May), pp. 481517.Google Scholar
Johnson, David. 1989. Letter of January 30 to Thomas R. H. Havens.Google Scholar
MacIntyre, Alasdair. 1967. “The Idea of a Social Science.” Reprinted in Wilson, 1970, pp. 112130.Google Scholar
Larson, Gerald James, and Deutsch, Eliot, eds. 1988. Interpreting Across Boundaries: New Essays in Comparative Philosophy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marriott, Mckim. 1989. Letter of January 13 to Thomas R. H. Havens.Google Scholar
Nathan, Andrew J. 1990. “The Place of Values in Cross-Cultural Studies: The Example of Democracy and China.” In Cohen and Goldman, 1990.Google Scholar
Rosemont, Henry Jr. 1988. “Against Relativism.” Larson and Deutsch, 1988, pp. 3670.Google Scholar
Said, Edward. 1978. Orientalism. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
Sax, William S. 1988. Review of Akos Ostor, Culture and Power: Legend, Ritual, Bazaar, and Rebellion in a Bengali Society. (1984), Jas, 47.3, pp. 687688.Google Scholar
Wilson, Bryan, ed. 1970. Rationality. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar