Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-n9wrp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-20T00:03:56.678Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Signature-Based Representations for the Reliability of Systems with Heterogeneous Components

Part of: Special processes Distribution theory - Probability

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 July 2016

Jorge Navarro ,
Francisco J. Samaniego  and
N. Balakrishnan
Jorge Navarro*
Affiliation:
Universidad de Murcia
Francisco J. Samaniego*
Affiliation:
University of California, Davis
N. Balakrishnan*
Affiliation:
McMaster University and King Saud University
*
∗ Postal address: Facultad de Matemáticas, Universidad de Murcia, 30100 Murcia, Spain. Email address: jorgenav@um.es
∗∗ Postal address: Department of Statistics, University of California, Davis, 1 Shields Avenue, 95616 Davis, CA, USA. Email address: fjsamaniego@ucdavis.edu
∗∗∗ Postal address: Department of Mathematics and Statistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario L8S 4K1, Canada. Email address: bala@mcmaster.ca
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Signature-based representations of the reliability functions of coherent systems with independent and identically distributed component lifetimes have proven very useful in studying the ageing characteristics of such systems and in comparing the performance of different systems under varied criteria. In this paper we consider extensions of these results to systems with heterogeneous components. New representation theorems are established for both the case of components with independent lifetimes and the case of component lifetimes under specific forms of dependence. These representations may be used to compare the performance of systems with homogeneous and heterogeneous components.

Keywords

Coherent systemk-out-of-n systemorder statisticsignaturemixturecopulastochastic order

MSC classification

Secondary: 60E15: Inequalities; stochastic orderings 60K10: Applications (reliability, demand theory, etc.)
Type
Research Papers
Information
Journal of Applied Probability , Volume 48 , Issue 3 , September 2011 , pp. 856 - 867
Copyright
Copyright © Applied Probability Trust 2011 

References

[1] Agrawal, A. and Barlow, R. E. (1984). A survey of network reliability and domination theory. Operat. Res. 32, 478–492.Google Scholar
[2] Barlow, R. E. and Proschan, F. (1975). Statistical Theory of Reliability and Life Testing. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York.Google Scholar
[3] Belzunce, F., Franco, M., Ruiz, J.-M. and Ruiz, M. C. (2001). On partial orderings between coherent systems with different structures. Prob. Eng. Inf. Sci. 15, 273–293.Google Scholar
[4] Bhattacharya, D. and Samaniego, F. J. (2010). On estimating component characteristics from system failure-time data. Naval Res. Logistics 57, 380–389.Google Scholar
[5] Boland, P. J. (2001). Signatures of indirect majority systems. J. Appl. Prob. 38, 597–603.Google Scholar
[6] De Finetti, B. (1931). Sul concetto di media. Giornale Ist. Ital. Attuari 2, 369–396.Google Scholar
[7] Esary, J. D. and Proschan, F. (1963). Relationship between system failure rate and component failure rates. Technometrics 5, 183–189.Google Scholar
[8] Hardy, G. H., Littlewood, J. E. and Pólya, G. (1934). Inequalities. Cambridge University Press, London.Google Scholar
[9] Jasiński, K., Navarro, J. and Rychlik, T. (2009). Bounds on variances of lifetimes of coherent and mixed systems. J. Appl. Prob. 46, 894–908.Google Scholar
[10] Khaledi, B.-E. and Shaked, M. (2007). Ordering conditional lifetimes of coherent systems. J. Statist. Planning Infer. 137, 1173–1184.Google Scholar
[11] Kochar, S., Mukerjee, H. and Samaniego, F. J. (1999). The “signature” of a coherent system and its application to comparisons among systems. Naval Res. Logistics 46, 507–523.Google Scholar
[12] Navarro, J. (2008). Likelihood ratio ordering of order statistics, mixtures and systems. J. Statist. Planning Infer. 138, 1242–1257.Google Scholar
[13] Navarro, J. and Hernandez, P. J. (2008). Mean residual life functions of finite mixtures, order statistics and coherent systems. Metrika 67, 277–298.Google Scholar
[14] Navarro, J. and Rubio, R. (2010). Comparisons of coherent systems using stochastic precedence. Test 19, 469–486.Google Scholar
[15] Navarro, J. and Rychlik, T. (2010). Comparisons and bounds for expected lifetimes of reliability systems. Europ. J. Operat. Res. 207, 309–317.Google Scholar
[16] Navarro, J. and Shaked, M. (2006). Hazard rate ordering of order statistics and systems. J. Appl. Prob. 43, 391–408.Google Scholar
[17] Navarro, J. and Shaked, M. (2010). Some properties of the minimum and the maximum of random variables with Joint logconcave distributions. Metrika 71, 313–317.Google Scholar
[18] Navarro, J. and Spizzichino, F. (2010). Comparisons of series and parallel systems with components sharing the same copula. Appl. Stoch. Models Business Industry 26, 775–791.Google Scholar
[19] Navarro, J., Ruiz, J. M. and Sandoval, C. J. (2007). Properties of coherent systems with dependent components. Commun. Statist. Theory Meth. 36, 175–191.Google Scholar
[20] Navarro, J., Samaniego, F. J. and Balakrishnan, N. (2010). The Joint signature of coherent systems with shared components. J. Appl. Prob. 47, 235–253.Google Scholar
[21] Navarro, J., Spizzichino, F. and Balakrishnan, N. (2010). Applications of average and projected systems to the study of coherent systems. J. Multivariate Anal. 101, 1471–1482.Google Scholar
[22] Navarro, J., Samaniego, F. J., Balakrishnan, N. and Bhattacharya, D. (2008). On the application and extension of system signatures in engineering reliability. Naval Res. Logistics 55, 313–327.Google Scholar
[23] Nelsen, R. B. (2006). An Introduction to Copulas, 2nd edn. Springer, New York.Google Scholar
[24] Rychlik, T. (2001). Projecting Statistical Functionals (Lecture Notes Statist. 160). Springer, New York.Google Scholar
[25] Samaniego, F. J. (1985). On closure of the IFR class under formation of coherent systems. IEEE Trans. Reliab. 34, 69–72.Google Scholar
[26] Samaniego, F. J. (2007). System Signatures and their Applications in Engineering Reliability (Internat. Ser. Operat. Res. Manag. Sci. 110). Springer, New York.Google Scholar
[27] Satyanarayana, A. and Prabhakar, A. (1978). New topological formula and rapid algorithm for reliability analysis of complex networks. IEEE Trans. Reliab. 27, 82–100.Google Scholar
[28] Shaked, M. and Shanthikumar, J. G. (2007). Stochastic Orders. Springer, New York.Google Scholar
[29] Shaked, M. and Suarez–Llorens, A. (2003). On the comparison of reliability experiments based on the convolution order. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 98, 693–702. {}Google Scholar
[30] Zhang, Z. (2010). Mixture representations of inactivity times of conditional coherent systems and their applications. J. Appl. Prob. 47, 876–885.Google Scholar