Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-tn8tq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-06T06:13:21.606Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Periodic Ornstein-Uhlenbeck processes driven by Lévy processes

Part of: Stochastic analysis Stochastic processes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 July 2016

Jan Pedersen
Jan Pedersen*
Affiliation:
MaPhySto and University of Aarhus
*
∗ Postal address: Department of Mathematical Sciences, University of Aarhus, Ny Munkegade, DK-8000 Aarhus C, Denmark. Email address: jan@imf.au.dk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In this paper, the class of periodic Ornstein-Uhlenbeck processes is defined. It is shown that periodic Ornstein-Uhlenbeck processes are stationary Markov random fields and the class of stationary distributions is characterized. In particular, any self-decomposable distribution is the stationary distribution of some periodic Ornstein-Uhlenbeck process. As examples, gamma periodic Ornstein-Uhlenbeck processes and Gaussian periodic Ornstein-Uhlenbeck processes are considered.

Keywords

Periodic processesLévy processesOrnstein-Uhlenbeck processesself-decomposable distributions

MSC classification

Primary: 60G10: Stationary processes 60G51: Processes with independent increments; L'evy processes
Secondary: 60H05: Stochastic integrals
Type
Research Papers
Information
Journal of Applied Probability , Volume 39 , Issue 4 , December 2002 , pp. 748 - 763
Copyright
Copyright © Applied Probability Trust 2002 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alabert, A., Ferrante, M., and Nualart, D. (1995). Markov field property of stochastic differential equations. Ann. Prob. 23, 1262–1288.Google Scholar
Barndorff-Nielsen, O. E., and Shephard, N. (2001). Non-Gaussian Ornstein–Uhlenbeck-based models and some of their uses in financial economics. J. R. Statist. Soc. B 63, 167–241.Google Scholar
Grenander, U. (1993). General Pattern Theory. A Mathematical Study of Regular Structures. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hobolth, A., and Jensen, E. B. V. (2000). Modelling stochastic changes in curve shape, with an application to cancer diagnostics. Adv. Appl. Prob. 32, 344–362.Google Scholar
Kwakernaak, H. (1975). Periodic linear differential stochastic processes. SIAM J. Control Optimization 13, 400–413.Google Scholar
Norris, J. R. (1998). Ornstein–Uhlenbeck processes indexed by the circle. Ann. Prob. 26, 465–478.Google Scholar
Nualart, D. (1995). The Malliavin Calculus and Related Topics. Springer, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ocone, D. and Pardoux, É. (1989). Linear stochastic differential equations with boundary conditions. Prob. Theory Relat. Fields 82, 489–526.Google Scholar
Rælly, S. and Thieullen, M. (2002). A characterization of reciprocal processes via an integration by parts formula on the path space. Prob. Theory Relat. Fields 123, 97–120.Google Scholar
Rocha-Arteaga, A., and Sato, K. (2001). Topics in infinitely divisible distributions and Lévy processes. Comun. Téc. I-01–15, CIMAT, Guanajuato.Google Scholar
Sato, K. (1999). Lévy Processes and Infinitely Divisible Distributions. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar