Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-qsmjn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T05:12:26.817Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On the Modelling of Imperfect Repairs for a Continuously Monitored Gamma Wear Process Through Age Reduction

Part of: Stochastic processes Operations research and management science

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 January 2018

Sophie Mercier  and
I. T. Castro
Sophie Mercier*
Affiliation:
Université de Pau et des Pays de l'Adour
I. T. Castro*
Affiliation:
Universidad de Extremadura
*
∗ Postal address: Laboratoire de Mathématiques et de leurs Applications - Pau (UMR CNRS 5142), Université de Pau et des Pays de l'Adour, Bâtiment IPRA, Avenue de l'Université, BP 1155, F-64013 Pau cedex, France. Email address: sophie.mercier@univ-pau.fr
∗∗ Postal address: Departamento de Matemáticas, Escuela Politécnica, Universidad de Extremadura, Avenida de la Universidad 10003, Cáceres, Spain. Email address: inmatorres@unex.es
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

A continuously monitored system is considered, which is subject to accumulating deterioration modelled as a gamma process. The system fails when its degradation level exceeds a limit threshold. At failure, a delayed replacement is performed. To shorten the down period, a condition-based maintenance strategy is applied, with imperfect repair. Mimicking virtual age models used for recurrent events, imperfect repair actions are assumed to lower the system degradation through a first-order arithmetic reduction of age model. Under these assumptions, Markov renewal equations are obtained for several reliability indicators. Numerical examples illustrate the behaviour of the system.

Keywords

Imperfect maintenancegamma processARA1Markov renewal processMarkov renewal equationdelay timemaintenance policy

MSC classification

Primary: 60G51: Processes with independent increments; L'evy processes
Secondary: 90B25: Reliability, availability, maintenance, inspection
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Applied Probability , Volume 50 , Issue 4 , December 2013 , pp. 1057 - 1076
Copyright
© Applied Probability Trust 

References

Asmussen, S. (2003). Applied Probability and Queues (Appl. Math. (New York) 51), 2nd edn. Springer, New York.Google Scholar
Bérenguer, C., Grall, A., Dieulle, L. and Roussignol, M. (2003). Maintenance policy for a continuously monitored deteriorating system. Prob. Eng. Inf. Sci. 17, 235–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bertoin, J. (1996). Lévy Processes (Cambridge Tracts Math. 121). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Castanier, B., Bérenguer, C. and Grall, A. (2003). {A sequential condition-based repair/replacement policy with non-periodic inspections for a system subject to continuous wear}. Appl. Stoch. Models Business Industry 19, 327–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castro, I. T. (2011). Imperfect maintenance. A review. In Maintenance Modelling and Applications, eds Andrews, J. et al., DNV Editorial, Norway, pp. 237–262.Google Scholar
Chaudhuri, D. and Sahu, K. C. (1977). {Preventive maintenance intervals for optimal reliability of deteriorating systems}. IEEE Trans. Reliab. 26, 371–372.Google Scholar
Doyen, L. and Gaudoin, O. (2004). {Classes of imperfect repair models based on reduction of failure intensity or virtual age}. Reliab. Eng. System Safety 84, 45–56.Google Scholar
Grall, A., Bérenguer, C. and Dieulle, L. (2002). A condition-based maintenance policy for stochastically deteriorating systems. Reliab. Eng. System Safety 76, 167–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grall, A., Dieulle, L., Bérenguer, C. and Roussignol, M. (2002). Continuous-time predictive-maintenance scheduling for a deteriorating system. IEEE Trans. Reliab. 51, 141–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grall, A., Dieulle, L., Bérenguer, C. and Roussignol, M. (2006). Asymptotic failure rate of a continuously monitored system. Reliab. Eng. System Safety 91, 126–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mercier, S. and Pham, H. H. (2012). A preventive maintenance policy for a continuously monitored system with correlated wear indicators. Europ. J. Operat. Res. 222, 263–272.Google Scholar
Newby, M. J. and Barker, C. T. (2006). A bivariate process model for maintenance and inspection planning. Internat. J. Pressure Vessels Piping 83, 270–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nicolai, R. P., Frenk, J. B. G. and Dekker, R. (2009). Modelling and optimizing imperfect maintenance of coatings on steel structures. Structural Safety 31, 234–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pham, H. and Wang, H. (1996). Imperfect maintenance. Europ. J. Operat. Res. 94, 425–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Press, W. H., Teukolsky, S. A., Vetterling, W. T. and Flannery, B. P. (1992). Numerical Recipes in FORTRAN: The Art of Scientific Computing. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Stadje, W. and Zuckerman, D. (1992). Optimal repair policies with general degree of repair in two maintenance models. Operat. Res. Lett. 11, 77–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Noortwijk, J. M. (2009). A survey of the application of Gamma processes in maintenance. Reliab. Eng. System Safety 94, 2–21.Google Scholar