Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-5g6vh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T20:34:56.367Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The moment problem for some Wiener functionals: corrections to previous proofs (with an appendix by H. L. Pedersen)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 July 2016

Per Hörfelt*
Affiliation:
Chalmers University of Technology
*
Postal address: Fraunhofer-Chalmers Research Centre for Industrial Mathematics, Chalmers Science Park, SE-412 88 Göteborg, Sweden. Email address: perh@fcc.chalmers.se
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

In this paper, we describe a class of Wiener functionals that are ‘indeterminate by their moments’, that is, whose distributions are not uniquely determined by their moments. In particular, it is proved that the integral of a geometric Brownian motion is indeterminate by its moments and, moreover, shown that previous proofs of this result are incorrect. The main result of this paper is based on geometric inequalities in Gauss space and on a generalization of the Krein criterion due to H. L. Pedersen.

MSC classification

Type
Research Papers
Copyright
© Applied Probability Trust 2005 

Footnotes

The author would like to thank Christer Borell, Chalmers University of Technology.

References

Berg, C. (1988). The cube of a normal distribution is indeterminate. Ann. Prob. 16, 910913.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berg, C. (1995). Indeterminate moment problems and the theory of entire functions. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 65, 2755.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berg, C. (2004). Correction to a paper by A. G. Pakes. J. Austral. Math. Soc. 76, 6773.Google Scholar
Borell, C. (1975). The Brunn–Minkowski inequality in Gauss space. Invent. Math. 30, 207216.Google Scholar
Borell, C. (2003). The Ehrhard inequality. C. R. Math. Acad. Sci. Paris 337, 663666.Google Scholar
Ehrhard, A. (1983). Symétrisation dans l'espace de Gauss. Math. Scand. 53, 281301.Google Scholar
Hoffmann-Jørgensen, J., Shepp, L. A. and Dudley, R. (1979). On the lower tail of Gaussian seminorms. Ann. Prob. 7, 319342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hörfelt, P. (2003). Geometric bounds on certain sublinear functionals of geometric Brownian motion. J. Appl. Prob. 40, 893905.Google Scholar
Koosis, P. (1988). The Logarithmic Integral. I (Camb. Studies Adv. Math. 12). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Krein, M. G. (1945). On an extrapolation problem due to Kolmogorov. Dokl. Acad. Nauk. SSSR 46, 306309.Google Scholar
Nikeghbali, A. (2002). Moment problem for some convex functionals of Brownian motion and related problems. Working paper 706, Université Paris VI.Google Scholar
Pakes, A. G. (2001). Remarks on converse Carleman and Krein criteria for the classical moment problem. J. Austral. Math. Soc. 71, 81104.Google Scholar
Pedersen, H. (1998). On Krein's theorem for indeterminacy of the classical moment problem. J. Approx. Theory 95, 90100.Google Scholar
Ransford, T. (1995). Potential Theory in the Complex Plane (London Math. Soc. Student Texts 28). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sudakov, V. N. and Cireĺson, B. S. (1978). Extremal properties of half-spaces for spherically invariant measures. J. Soviet Math. 9, 918.Google Scholar
Yor, M. (1992). On some exponential functionals of Brownian motion. Adv. Appl. Prob. 24, 509531.Google Scholar