Last updated 10th July 2024: Online ordering is currently unavailable due to technical issues. We apologise for any delays responding to customers while we resolve this. For further updates please visit our website https://www.cambridge.org/news-and-insights/technical-incident
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 January 2009
Anglicanism has come to worldwide significance in the context of modernity and debate about the recent difficulties in the Anglican communion which have been of such note and concern has been influenced by this context. The categories of the debate as reflected in the Virginia Report provide a case study of the difficulties. That report is examined in this light and the tendency of the argument drawn out to show a disposition to see issues in terms of control and exclusion. A consideration of the origins of the Anglican Communion shows that it expresses a disposition of Christians to pray for one another. It is a myth not in the sense that it is unreal but in the sense that it provides a way of understanding how the communion works. It works like a myth and in being re-enacted gains its force. This argument is combined with the notion of scapegoat in the writings of Rene Girard and applied to the case of Gene Robinson in order to lead to a better understanding of inclusive love and communion.
1. Tillich, Paul, Systematic Theology (3 vols.; Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1967), III, p. 206.Google Scholar
2. The text of the Virginia Report can be found in Dyer, M.J. et al. (eds.), The Official Report of the Lambeth Conference, 1998 (Harrisburg: Morehouse, 1999) and on the website of the Anglican Communion: http://www.anglicancommunion.org/lambeth/reports/report1.html.Google Scholar
3. Resolution III.8(h) in Dyer, et al. (eds.), Official Report of the Lambeth Conference, p. 399.Google Scholar
4. Alves, R.A., Protestantism and Repression: A Brazilian Case Study (Maryknoll, NY: Orbis Books, 1985).Google Scholar
5. See the recent discussion of this issue in Drake, H.A., Constantine and the Bishops: The Politics of Intolerance (Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 2000).Google Scholar
6. See Theobald, Christoph, ‘Deus é relação: a propósito de alguns enfoques recentes do mistério da Trindade’, Revista Concilium 289/2001 (Petrópolis: Vozes, 2001), p. 47.Google Scholar
7. Theobald, , ‘Deus é relação’, p. 160.Google Scholar
8. Moltmann, Jurgen, A vinda de Deus: Escatologia Cristã (São Leopoldo: Unisinos, 2003), p. 204.Google Scholar
9. Greshake, Gisbert, El Dios Uno y Trino (Barcelona: Herder, 2001), p. 179.Google Scholar
10. Greshake, , El Dios Uno y Trino, p. 82.Google Scholar
11. Nietzsche, F., Assim falava Zaratustra (São Paulo: Hemus, 1979), p. 31.Google Scholar
12. Neill, Stephen, El Anglicanismo (Madrid: Iglesia Española Reformada Episcopal, s/d), p. 287.Google Scholar
13. Quoted by Neill, , El Anglicanismo, p. 339.Google Scholar
14. The text may be found in Coleman, R. (ed.), Resolutions of the Twelve Lambeth Conferences 1867–1988 (Toronto: Anglican Book Centre, 1992), pp. 83–84.Google Scholar
15. These issues are taken up in the later Windsor Report, which, however, is not the focus of this article. The Windsor Report calls for further and fuller treatment.
16. In Brazil to call somebody ‘Bambi’ is to use a pejorative, macho and demeaning name for gay people.
17. Girard, R., Violence and the Sacred (Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1977).Google Scholar
